Validation of oral-nasal specimen collection for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.66
Matthew Young, Yuri Suico, Omid Kyle Vojdani, Janine McCready, Kevin Katz, Scarlett Pourmatin, Manija Rahimi, Christie Vermeiren, Jeff Powis, Christopher Kandel
{"title":"Validation of oral-nasal specimen collection for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection.","authors":"Matthew Young, Yuri Suico, Omid Kyle Vojdani, Janine McCready, Kevin Katz, Scarlett Pourmatin, Manija Rahimi, Christie Vermeiren, Jeff Powis, Christopher Kandel","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Respiratory virus testing is routinely performed and ways to obtain specimens aside from a nasopharyngeal swab are needed for pandemic preparedness. The main objective is to validate a self-collected oral-nasal swab for the detection of Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Diagnostic test validation of a self-collected oral nasal swab as compared to a provider-collected nasopharyngeal swab.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Emergency Department at Michael Garron Hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with a suspected viral upper respiratory tract infection were included if they self-collected an oral-nasal swab. Individuals testing positive for Influenza or RSV along with randomly selected participants who tested negative were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All participants had the paired oral-nasal swab tested using a multiplex respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction for the three respiratory pathogens and compared to the nasopharyngeal swab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 individuals tested positive for Influenza, severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or RSV along with 80 who tested negative. 110 were symptomatic with the median time from symptom onset to testing of 1 day (interquartile range 2-5 days). Using the clinical nasopharyngeal swab as the reference standard, the sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for RSV, sensitivity is 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and specificity is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) for Influenza.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiplex testing with a self-collected oral-nasal swab for Influenza and RSV is not an acceptable substitute for a healthcare provider collected nasopharyngeal swab primarily due to suboptimal Influenza test characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Respiratory virus testing is routinely performed and ways to obtain specimens aside from a nasopharyngeal swab are needed for pandemic preparedness. The main objective is to validate a self-collected oral-nasal swab for the detection of Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

Design: Diagnostic test validation of a self-collected oral nasal swab as compared to a provider-collected nasopharyngeal swab.

Setting: Emergency Department at Michael Garron Hospital.

Participants: Consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with a suspected viral upper respiratory tract infection were included if they self-collected an oral-nasal swab. Individuals testing positive for Influenza or RSV along with randomly selected participants who tested negative were eligible for inclusion.

Interventions: All participants had the paired oral-nasal swab tested using a multiplex respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction for the three respiratory pathogens and compared to the nasopharyngeal swab.

Results: 48 individuals tested positive for Influenza, severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or RSV along with 80 who tested negative. 110 were symptomatic with the median time from symptom onset to testing of 1 day (interquartile range 2-5 days). Using the clinical nasopharyngeal swab as the reference standard, the sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for RSV, sensitivity is 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and specificity is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) for Influenza.

Conclusions: Multiplex testing with a self-collected oral-nasal swab for Influenza and RSV is not an acceptable substitute for a healthcare provider collected nasopharyngeal swab primarily due to suboptimal Influenza test characteristics.

用于流感和呼吸道合胞病毒检测的口鼻标本采集的验证。
目的:常规进行呼吸道病毒检测,除鼻咽拭子外,还需要获取标本的方法,以防备大流行。主要目的是验证自行收集的口鼻拭子检测流感和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的有效性。设计:对自行收集的口腔鼻拭子与提供者收集的鼻咽拭子进行诊断试验验证。地点:Michael Garron医院急诊科。参与者:连续出现在急诊室疑似病毒性上呼吸道感染的个体,如果他们自己收集了口鼻拭子,则包括在内。流感或呼吸道合胞病毒检测呈阳性的个体以及随机选择的检测呈阴性的参与者均符合入选条件。干预措施:所有参与者都使用多重呼吸道病毒聚合酶链反应对三种呼吸道病原体进行配对口鼻拭子测试,并与鼻咽拭子进行比较。结果:48人流感、严重急性呼吸道冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)或RSV检测呈阳性,80人检测呈阴性。110例出现症状,从出现症状到检测的中位时间为1天(四分位数间距为2-5天)。以临床鼻咽拭子作为参比标准,RSV的敏感性为0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95),特异性为0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00),流感的敏感性为0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81),特异性为0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99)。结论:由于流感试验特征不理想,自行收集的口鼻拭子对流感和RSV的多重检测不能替代卫生保健提供者收集的鼻咽拭子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信