Sharing an automatic link is crucial in the congruency sequence effect between spatial conflict tasks.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Seokmin Kang, Yang Seok Cho
{"title":"Sharing an automatic link is crucial in the congruency sequence effect between spatial conflict tasks.","authors":"Seokmin Kang, Yang Seok Cho","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02707-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been proposed that the control mechanism underlying the congruent sequence effect (CSE) resolves spatial conflict by suppressing an automatic link between spatial stimulus and response codes. However, previous explanation for the inhibitory influence on the automatic link was based solely on demonstrating that the control mechanisms are specific to the task-irrelevant stimulus and response dimensions, rather than the automatic link itself. The present study investigated whether the occurrence of the cross-task CSE depends on the sharing of an automatic link between two tasks, when the two tasks share an irrelevant stimulus dimension and response mode. In the experiment, participants performed alternating trials of a horizontal Simon task and a vertical spatial Stroop task. The cross-task CSE was significant only when response keys for each task were spatially configured to correspond to the axes of possible target stimulus locations (H-V configuration of response sets), making the two tasks share an automatic link. However, no cross-task CSE was obtained when all response keys were aligned horizontally (H-H configuration of response sets). With the H-H configuration, there was no spatial correspondence between the stimulus and response locations in the vertical spatial Stroop task, whereas the horizontal task involved such a correspondence, preventing the two tasks from sharing an automatic link. These results indicate that sharing of an automatic link between spatial conflict tasks is crucial for the occurrence of the cross-task CSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02707-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been proposed that the control mechanism underlying the congruent sequence effect (CSE) resolves spatial conflict by suppressing an automatic link between spatial stimulus and response codes. However, previous explanation for the inhibitory influence on the automatic link was based solely on demonstrating that the control mechanisms are specific to the task-irrelevant stimulus and response dimensions, rather than the automatic link itself. The present study investigated whether the occurrence of the cross-task CSE depends on the sharing of an automatic link between two tasks, when the two tasks share an irrelevant stimulus dimension and response mode. In the experiment, participants performed alternating trials of a horizontal Simon task and a vertical spatial Stroop task. The cross-task CSE was significant only when response keys for each task were spatially configured to correspond to the axes of possible target stimulus locations (H-V configuration of response sets), making the two tasks share an automatic link. However, no cross-task CSE was obtained when all response keys were aligned horizontally (H-H configuration of response sets). With the H-H configuration, there was no spatial correspondence between the stimulus and response locations in the vertical spatial Stroop task, whereas the horizontal task involved such a correspondence, preventing the two tasks from sharing an automatic link. These results indicate that sharing of an automatic link between spatial conflict tasks is crucial for the occurrence of the cross-task CSE.

共享自动链接是空间冲突任务间一致性序列效应的关键。
一致序列效应(CSE)的控制机制通过抑制空间刺激和反应码之间的自动联系来解决空间冲突。然而,先前对自动链接的抑制影响的解释仅仅是基于证明控制机制是特定于任务无关刺激和反应维度的,而不是自动链接本身。本研究探讨了当两个任务共享一个不相关的刺激维度和反应模式时,跨任务CSE的发生是否取决于两个任务之间共享一个自动链接。在实验中,参与者交替进行水平Simon任务和垂直空间Stroop任务。只有当每个任务的反应键在空间上配置为对应于可能的目标刺激位置轴(反应集的H-V配置),使两个任务共享一个自动链接时,跨任务CSE才显著。然而,当所有响应键水平排列(响应集的H-H配置)时,没有得到跨任务CSE。在H-H配置下,垂直空间Stroop任务的刺激点和反应点之间不存在空间对应关系,而水平空间Stroop任务存在这种对应关系,使得两个任务无法共享一个自动链接。这些结果表明,共享空间冲突任务之间的自动链接对于跨任务CSE的发生至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信