{"title":"Sharing an automatic link is crucial in the congruency sequence effect between spatial conflict tasks.","authors":"Seokmin Kang, Yang Seok Cho","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02707-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been proposed that the control mechanism underlying the congruent sequence effect (CSE) resolves spatial conflict by suppressing an automatic link between spatial stimulus and response codes. However, previous explanation for the inhibitory influence on the automatic link was based solely on demonstrating that the control mechanisms are specific to the task-irrelevant stimulus and response dimensions, rather than the automatic link itself. The present study investigated whether the occurrence of the cross-task CSE depends on the sharing of an automatic link between two tasks, when the two tasks share an irrelevant stimulus dimension and response mode. In the experiment, participants performed alternating trials of a horizontal Simon task and a vertical spatial Stroop task. The cross-task CSE was significant only when response keys for each task were spatially configured to correspond to the axes of possible target stimulus locations (H-V configuration of response sets), making the two tasks share an automatic link. However, no cross-task CSE was obtained when all response keys were aligned horizontally (H-H configuration of response sets). With the H-H configuration, there was no spatial correspondence between the stimulus and response locations in the vertical spatial Stroop task, whereas the horizontal task involved such a correspondence, preventing the two tasks from sharing an automatic link. These results indicate that sharing of an automatic link between spatial conflict tasks is crucial for the occurrence of the cross-task CSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02707-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It has been proposed that the control mechanism underlying the congruent sequence effect (CSE) resolves spatial conflict by suppressing an automatic link between spatial stimulus and response codes. However, previous explanation for the inhibitory influence on the automatic link was based solely on demonstrating that the control mechanisms are specific to the task-irrelevant stimulus and response dimensions, rather than the automatic link itself. The present study investigated whether the occurrence of the cross-task CSE depends on the sharing of an automatic link between two tasks, when the two tasks share an irrelevant stimulus dimension and response mode. In the experiment, participants performed alternating trials of a horizontal Simon task and a vertical spatial Stroop task. The cross-task CSE was significant only when response keys for each task were spatially configured to correspond to the axes of possible target stimulus locations (H-V configuration of response sets), making the two tasks share an automatic link. However, no cross-task CSE was obtained when all response keys were aligned horizontally (H-H configuration of response sets). With the H-H configuration, there was no spatial correspondence between the stimulus and response locations in the vertical spatial Stroop task, whereas the horizontal task involved such a correspondence, preventing the two tasks from sharing an automatic link. These results indicate that sharing of an automatic link between spatial conflict tasks is crucial for the occurrence of the cross-task CSE.
期刊介绍:
The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.