Comparison of jaw thrust and backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP) manoeuvre with conventional technique on glottic visualization and intubation characteristics using C-MAC video-laryngoscope.

IF 1.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
V Keerthi Jain, Anita Seth, Rakesh Kumar, A A Yazhini, Santvana Kohli
{"title":"Comparison of jaw thrust and backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP) manoeuvre with conventional technique on glottic visualization and intubation characteristics using C-MAC video-laryngoscope.","authors":"V Keerthi Jain, Anita Seth, Rakesh Kumar, A A Yazhini, Santvana Kohli","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_92_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Traditionally various methods have been employed to improve glottic visualization during laryngoscopy, namely backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP) and jaw trust with promising results. The current study aims to compare these maneuvers for the enhancement of glottic visualization during video laryngoscopy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized study in 120 adult patients with normal airways, C-MAC® laryngoscopy was performed under general anesthesia (GA). Images of the glottis with conventional laryngoscopic technique, using BURP maneuver and jaw thrust were acquired, and Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, and approximate glottic area were recorded from the images. Subsequently, patients were divided into three equal groups-in group C, the trachea was intubated using conventional laryngoscopic technique, in group B, BURP was used, and in group J, jaw thrust was used. Intubation time, ease of intubation, number of intubation attempts, incidence of airway trauma, and postoperative sore throat were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both jaw thrust and BURP maneuvers improved CL grading, POGO score, and glottic area significantly as compared to the conventional laryngoscopic technique. CL grading and POGO score were better with BURP than with jaw thrust; however, the glottic area improved more with jaw thrust. Jaw thrust also resulted in statistically significant lower intubation time and better ease of insertion score. Intubation was successful in the first attempt in all patients and there was no airway trauma and postoperative sore throat.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both BURP and jaw thrust maneuvers result in better glottic visualization. Jaw thrust provides lower intubation times, better ease of intubation scores, as well as a higher visualized glottic area than BURP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 2","pages":"304-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_92_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Traditionally various methods have been employed to improve glottic visualization during laryngoscopy, namely backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP) and jaw trust with promising results. The current study aims to compare these maneuvers for the enhancement of glottic visualization during video laryngoscopy.

Material and methods: In this prospective randomized study in 120 adult patients with normal airways, C-MAC® laryngoscopy was performed under general anesthesia (GA). Images of the glottis with conventional laryngoscopic technique, using BURP maneuver and jaw thrust were acquired, and Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, and approximate glottic area were recorded from the images. Subsequently, patients were divided into three equal groups-in group C, the trachea was intubated using conventional laryngoscopic technique, in group B, BURP was used, and in group J, jaw thrust was used. Intubation time, ease of intubation, number of intubation attempts, incidence of airway trauma, and postoperative sore throat were noted.

Results: Both jaw thrust and BURP maneuvers improved CL grading, POGO score, and glottic area significantly as compared to the conventional laryngoscopic technique. CL grading and POGO score were better with BURP than with jaw thrust; however, the glottic area improved more with jaw thrust. Jaw thrust also resulted in statistically significant lower intubation time and better ease of insertion score. Intubation was successful in the first attempt in all patients and there was no airway trauma and postoperative sore throat.

Conclusion: Both BURP and jaw thrust maneuvers result in better glottic visualization. Jaw thrust provides lower intubation times, better ease of intubation scores, as well as a higher visualized glottic area than BURP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

C-MAC视频喉镜下颌突和后向上右压(BURP)操作与常规技术对声门显像和插管特征的比较。
背景与目的:传统上有多种方法用于改善喉镜检查时的声门可视化,即向后、向上、向右的压力(BURP)和颌信任,并取得了良好的效果。目前的研究目的是比较这些手法在视频喉镜检查中增强声门可视化。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性随机研究中,120名正常气道的成年患者在全身麻醉(GA)下进行C-MAC®喉镜检查。采用常规喉镜技术,采用BURP手法和颌突法获得声门图像,并记录图像中的Cormack-Lehane (CL)评分、声门开口百分比(POGO)评分和声门近似面积。随后将患者分为三组,C组采用常规喉镜技术插管气管,B组采用BURP, J组采用颌推法。记录插管时间、插管难易程度、插管次数、气道创伤发生率和术后喉咙痛。结果:与常规喉镜技术相比,颌骨推力和BURP操作均可显著改善CL分级、POGO评分和声门面积。BURP组CL评分和POGO评分优于颌部推力组;然而,随着颌突的增加,声门面积得到了更多的改善。下颌推力也导致插管时间缩短,插管评分更容易。所有患者首次插管成功,无气道损伤和术后喉咙痛。结论:BURP和颌突动作均能提高声门显像效果。与BURP相比,下颌推力提供更短的插管时间,更好的插管评分,以及更高的声门可见面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信