Alena Kathryn Hoover, Leroy R Thacker, Frances E Casey
{"title":"Assessment and implementation of Expedited Partner Therapy at an academic medical center.","authors":"Alena Kathryn Hoover, Leroy R Thacker, Frances E Casey","doi":"10.1071/SH25035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) is the practice of treating sexual partner(s) of patients diagnosed with STIs without examining the partner(s) and is effective in reducing reinfection. It has been permissible in Virginia since 2020. This study aimed to assess knowledge and practices surrounding prescription of EPT at an academic medical center in Virginia before and after an online learning module. Methods Data were obtained via online anonymous RedCap surveys. The first was distributed via e-mail to providers who regularly diagnose and treat STIs at an academic medical center in Virginia. The survey assessed provider knowledge and practices regarding EPT and preference of future education. On the basis of the results, an online learning module with information on EPT was created and distributed to the same population of providers. The module contained pre- and post-module surveys evaluating participant knowledge of the legal status, methods of prescription, and attitudes surrounding EPT. Results The initial survey showed that 10% of participants were aware of the new legal status of EPT. In terms of EPT prescription, 4% always prescribed EPT, 14% prescribed it sometimes, and 61% never prescribed it. In the pre-module survey, 31% of respondents correctly identified one option for prescription of EPT. Knowledge surrounding the legal status and prescription methods was significantly improved in the post-module responses, with 100% of participants able to identify one correct prescription option. Conclusion These results show knowledge gaps surrounding the Virginia EPT provision and policy change. These gaps improved with the implementation of an online learning module. Further evaluation is needed to assess the continued implementation of EPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) is the practice of treating sexual partner(s) of patients diagnosed with STIs without examining the partner(s) and is effective in reducing reinfection. It has been permissible in Virginia since 2020. This study aimed to assess knowledge and practices surrounding prescription of EPT at an academic medical center in Virginia before and after an online learning module. Methods Data were obtained via online anonymous RedCap surveys. The first was distributed via e-mail to providers who regularly diagnose and treat STIs at an academic medical center in Virginia. The survey assessed provider knowledge and practices regarding EPT and preference of future education. On the basis of the results, an online learning module with information on EPT was created and distributed to the same population of providers. The module contained pre- and post-module surveys evaluating participant knowledge of the legal status, methods of prescription, and attitudes surrounding EPT. Results The initial survey showed that 10% of participants were aware of the new legal status of EPT. In terms of EPT prescription, 4% always prescribed EPT, 14% prescribed it sometimes, and 61% never prescribed it. In the pre-module survey, 31% of respondents correctly identified one option for prescription of EPT. Knowledge surrounding the legal status and prescription methods was significantly improved in the post-module responses, with 100% of participants able to identify one correct prescription option. Conclusion These results show knowledge gaps surrounding the Virginia EPT provision and policy change. These gaps improved with the implementation of an online learning module. Further evaluation is needed to assess the continued implementation of EPT.
期刊介绍:
Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence.
Officially sponsored by:
The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP
Sexual Health Society of Queensland
Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.