Safety, efficacy, and compliance of moderate-to-high dose eptinezumab and erenumab in chronic migraine patients with medication-overuse headache: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nhan Nguyen, Vinh Ho Quang Tri, Vy Nguyen Ngoc Dan, Nghi Bao Tran, Laszlo Olah, Mate Heja
{"title":"Safety, efficacy, and compliance of moderate-to-high dose eptinezumab and erenumab in chronic migraine patients with medication-overuse headache: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nhan Nguyen, Vinh Ho Quang Tri, Vy Nguyen Ngoc Dan, Nghi Bao Tran, Laszlo Olah, Mate Heja","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02047-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of monoclonal antibodies targeting Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) is an established treatment for chronic migraine (CM). However, its efficacy in CM patients with medication overuse headache (MOH) remains underexplored, and data on the safety and patient compliance of standard-to-high doses, especially Eptinezumab and Erenumab, over at least three months are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP therapy (Eptinezumab and Erenumab) in CM and MOH patients. Specifically, it assesses changes in monthly migraine days (MMDs) after 12 weeks, risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation, serious TEAEs, common adverse effects, and MOH remission at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating standard or high dose anti-CGRP therapy in CM patients strictly with MOH. Studies included were required to report a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs after ≥ 12 weeks, serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, common adverse events, and MOH remission at 6 months. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics and a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs with 769 patients receiving standard-to-high dose anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (Eptinezumab and Erenumab) for ≥ 12 weeks were included. Anti-CGRP therapy significantly increased the likelihood of a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs compared to placebo (OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.68-3.51; p < 0.00001). No substantial differences were found in TEAEs leading to discontinuation, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, or serious TEAEs between the anti-CGRP and placebo groups. The likelihood of MOH remission was approximately double in the anti-CGRP group (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.40-2.78; p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard-to-high dose anti-CGRP therapies (eptinezumab, erenumab) effectively reduce monthly migraine days and improve MOH remission rates with minimal adverse effects, showing good tolerability in CM patients with MOH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02047-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of monoclonal antibodies targeting Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) is an established treatment for chronic migraine (CM). However, its efficacy in CM patients with medication overuse headache (MOH) remains underexplored, and data on the safety and patient compliance of standard-to-high doses, especially Eptinezumab and Erenumab, over at least three months are limited.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP therapy (Eptinezumab and Erenumab) in CM and MOH patients. Specifically, it assesses changes in monthly migraine days (MMDs) after 12 weeks, risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation, serious TEAEs, common adverse effects, and MOH remission at 6 months.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating standard or high dose anti-CGRP therapy in CM patients strictly with MOH. Studies included were required to report a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs after ≥ 12 weeks, serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, common adverse events, and MOH remission at 6 months. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics and a random-effects model.
Results: Three RCTs with 769 patients receiving standard-to-high dose anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (Eptinezumab and Erenumab) for ≥ 12 weeks were included. Anti-CGRP therapy significantly increased the likelihood of a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs compared to placebo (OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.68-3.51; p < 0.00001). No substantial differences were found in TEAEs leading to discontinuation, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, or serious TEAEs between the anti-CGRP and placebo groups. The likelihood of MOH remission was approximately double in the anti-CGRP group (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.40-2.78; p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: Standard-to-high dose anti-CGRP therapies (eptinezumab, erenumab) effectively reduce monthly migraine days and improve MOH remission rates with minimal adverse effects, showing good tolerability in CM patients with MOH.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data.
With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.