High risk of malignancy in neonates with cystic pulmonary abnormalities and no antenatal findings.

IF 1 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Alessia Bertolino, Riccardo Guanà, Elisa Zambaiti, Alessia Cerrina, Alessandro Pane, Salvatore Garofalo, Fabrizio Gennari, Federico Scottoni
{"title":"High risk of malignancy in neonates with cystic pulmonary abnormalities and no antenatal findings.","authors":"Alessia Bertolino, Riccardo Guanà, Elisa Zambaiti, Alessia Cerrina, Alessandro Pane, Salvatore Garofalo, Fabrizio Gennari, Federico Scottoni","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07552-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The postnatal management of pulmonary malformations is still controversial, especially in terms of indication and timing for surgery. Despite being rare, neonatal lung tumors should be included in the differential diagnosis in case of neonatal pulmonary abnormalities. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the absence of antenatal findings should be considered a risk factor for malignancy in patients with lung abnormalities at postnatal imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of neonatal patients undergone surgery for pulmonary abnormalities in our hospital, over a period of 5 years (2017-2021), were retrospectively reviewed. Histological diagnosis and presence of findings at prenatal scans were recorded. A literature review on this topic was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histological diagnosis was pulmonary primary malignancy in 3 cases (2 pulmonary blastomas, 1 fetal lung interstitial tumor), the remaining 20 were diagnosed as pulmonary malformations. We recorded that 100% of our patients affected by lung tumor had no abnormalities at prenatal scans. Three papers reporting similar results were found in literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differential diagnosis among neonatal cystic abnormalities is challenging. When a cystic lung lesion is present in infants who had no abnormalities at standard antenatal scans, a malignancy should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":56337,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07552-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The postnatal management of pulmonary malformations is still controversial, especially in terms of indication and timing for surgery. Despite being rare, neonatal lung tumors should be included in the differential diagnosis in case of neonatal pulmonary abnormalities. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the absence of antenatal findings should be considered a risk factor for malignancy in patients with lung abnormalities at postnatal imaging.

Methods: The medical records of neonatal patients undergone surgery for pulmonary abnormalities in our hospital, over a period of 5 years (2017-2021), were retrospectively reviewed. Histological diagnosis and presence of findings at prenatal scans were recorded. A literature review on this topic was also conducted.

Results: Histological diagnosis was pulmonary primary malignancy in 3 cases (2 pulmonary blastomas, 1 fetal lung interstitial tumor), the remaining 20 were diagnosed as pulmonary malformations. We recorded that 100% of our patients affected by lung tumor had no abnormalities at prenatal scans. Three papers reporting similar results were found in literature.

Conclusions: Differential diagnosis among neonatal cystic abnormalities is challenging. When a cystic lung lesion is present in infants who had no abnormalities at standard antenatal scans, a malignancy should be considered.

新生儿囊性肺异常和没有产前检查的恶性肿瘤的高风险。
背景:肺畸形的产后处理仍然存在争议,特别是在手术的指征和时机方面。新生儿肺肿瘤虽罕见,但在新生儿肺异常时应纳入鉴别诊断。本研究的目的是评估产前检查结果的缺失是否应被视为产后肺部影像学异常患者恶性肿瘤的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析我院5年(2017-2021年)新生儿肺异常手术患者的病历。记录组织学诊断和产前扫描结果。并对这一课题进行了文献综述。结果:组织学诊断为肺原发恶性肿瘤3例(肺母细胞瘤2例,胎儿肺间质瘤1例),其余20例诊断为肺畸形。我们记录了100%的肺癌患者在产前扫描中没有异常。文献中发现了三篇报告类似结果的论文。结论:新生儿囊性异常的鉴别诊断具有挑战性。当在标准产前扫描中没有异常的婴儿出现囊性肺病变时,应考虑恶性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
294
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信