"Stop, don't touch, run away!": reconceptualizing firearm industry-funded youth education programs as corporate political activity.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
May C I van Schalkwyk, Benjamin Hawkins, Nason Maani, Mark Petticrew
{"title":"\"Stop, don't touch, run away!\": reconceptualizing firearm industry-funded youth education programs as corporate political activity.","authors":"May C I van Schalkwyk, Benjamin Hawkins, Nason Maani, Mark Petticrew","doi":"10.1186/s12992-025-01106-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injuries represent a major threat to child health globally. In the US, firearm injuries are the leading cause of death among children and adolescents. Despite limited evidence of their effectiveness industry-funded bodies promote the delivery of their youth education programs while lobbying against firearm control policies. This article analyzes how the National Rifle Association (NRA) frames issues of gun ownership, safety and the role of the Eddie Eagle GunSafe<sup>®</sup> program as an effective firearm safety intervention and examines how the design, promotion and delivery of the program serves the corporate political interests of the firearm industry at the expense of public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an analysis of Eddie Eagle Gunsafe<sup>®</sup> program-related materials and the NRA's practices to promote the program's legitimacy and effectiveness, by applying published taxonomies of corporate framing and action strategies. Data were collected from the program-specific websites and other NRA outlets to capture the breadth of strategies used by the NRA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NRA's education-related practices support the firearm industry's political agenda. The NRA adopts framing and action strategies that present the presence of firearms in homes and communities as inevitable and normal, and the education of children through the delivery of their \"lifesaving\" program as the common-sense and effective way of keeping children safe from firearm injuries. They make misleading claims about the effectiveness of the Eddie Eagle Gunsafe<sup>®</sup> program while undermining the credibility of those who advocate for child safety, including mothers and public health actors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The delivery of the Eddie Eagle GunSafe<sup>®</sup> program needs critical scrutiny as is increasingly applied to other industry-funded initiatives. Policies based on a recognition that children and adolescents are safest when their homes and communities are free of firearms are needed. Findings from this analysis are relevant beyond the US and can be used to inform the governance of child safety and injury prevention globally. Analysis of the firearm industry extends the literature on the commercial determinants of health to an important new sector with significant impacts on global health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01106-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Injuries represent a major threat to child health globally. In the US, firearm injuries are the leading cause of death among children and adolescents. Despite limited evidence of their effectiveness industry-funded bodies promote the delivery of their youth education programs while lobbying against firearm control policies. This article analyzes how the National Rifle Association (NRA) frames issues of gun ownership, safety and the role of the Eddie Eagle GunSafe® program as an effective firearm safety intervention and examines how the design, promotion and delivery of the program serves the corporate political interests of the firearm industry at the expense of public health.

Methods: We conducted an analysis of Eddie Eagle Gunsafe® program-related materials and the NRA's practices to promote the program's legitimacy and effectiveness, by applying published taxonomies of corporate framing and action strategies. Data were collected from the program-specific websites and other NRA outlets to capture the breadth of strategies used by the NRA.

Results: The NRA's education-related practices support the firearm industry's political agenda. The NRA adopts framing and action strategies that present the presence of firearms in homes and communities as inevitable and normal, and the education of children through the delivery of their "lifesaving" program as the common-sense and effective way of keeping children safe from firearm injuries. They make misleading claims about the effectiveness of the Eddie Eagle Gunsafe® program while undermining the credibility of those who advocate for child safety, including mothers and public health actors.

Conclusion: The delivery of the Eddie Eagle GunSafe® program needs critical scrutiny as is increasingly applied to other industry-funded initiatives. Policies based on a recognition that children and adolescents are safest when their homes and communities are free of firearms are needed. Findings from this analysis are relevant beyond the US and can be used to inform the governance of child safety and injury prevention globally. Analysis of the firearm industry extends the literature on the commercial determinants of health to an important new sector with significant impacts on global health.

“站住,别碰,快跑!”将枪支工业资助的青少年教育项目重新定义为企业政治活动。
背景:伤害是全球儿童健康的一大威胁。在美国,枪支伤害是儿童和青少年死亡的主要原因。尽管证明其有效性的证据有限,但行业资助的机构在游说反对枪支管制政策的同时,促进了青少年教育项目的实施。本文分析了全国步枪协会(NRA)如何构建枪支所有权、安全问题,以及艾迪·伊格尔枪支安全®计划作为有效枪支安全干预措施的作用,并考察了该计划的设计、推广和实施如何以牺牲公众健康为代价,服务于枪支行业的企业政治利益。方法:我们对Eddie Eagle Gunsafe®项目相关材料和NRA的实践进行了分析,通过应用已发布的企业框架和行动策略分类来促进项目的合法性和有效性。数据是从特定项目网站和其他全国步枪协会网点收集的,以了解全国步枪协会使用的策略的广度。结果:全国步枪协会的教育相关做法支持了枪支行业的政治议程。全国步枪协会采用框架和行动策略,将家庭和社区中枪支的存在视为不可避免和正常的,并通过提供“救生”计划对儿童进行教育,使其成为常识和有效的方式,以保护儿童免受枪支伤害。他们对Eddie Eagle Gunsafe®计划的有效性做出误导性的声明,同时破坏了那些倡导儿童安全的人的信誉,包括母亲和公共卫生行为者。结论:Eddie Eagle GunSafe®项目的交付需要严格审查,因为它越来越多地应用于其他行业资助的项目。当儿童和青少年的家庭和社区没有枪支时,他们是最安全的。这一分析的结果与美国以外的国家相关,可用于全球儿童安全和伤害预防的治理。对枪械工业的分析将关于健康的商业决定因素的文献扩展到一个对全球健康有重大影响的重要新部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信