The action of different irrigant activation methods on engineered endodontic biofilm: an in vitro study.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v12.43065
Aya Awaida, Roula El Hachem, Aline Issa, Mireille Kallasy, Carla Zogheib, Wajih Hage
{"title":"The action of different irrigant activation methods on engineered endodontic biofilm: an <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Aya Awaida, Roula El Hachem, Aline Issa, Mireille Kallasy, Carla Zogheib, Wajih Hage","doi":"10.2340/biid.v12.43065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endodontic infections are biofilm-mediated, demanding effective biofilm eradication from the root canal. Root canal complexities, coupled with bacterial biofilm resistance, pose challenges to thorough disinfection. Irrigation, particularly with sodium hypochlorite, is crucial in endodontics. Activation techniques, like sonic or ultrasonic oscillations, enhance irrigant penetration and biofilm disruption, improving decontamination and treatment outcomes.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of XP Finisher, EndoUltra, Eddy and Irriflex in the reduction of the multispecies endodontic biofilm formed by <i>Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans and Proteus mirabilis.</i></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 44 single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected and divided into groups for investigation: Group A: Irriflex, Group B: XP Finisher, Group C: Eddy system, and Group D: EndoUltra system. Multispecies biofilms, comprising <i>Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,</i> and <i>Candida albicans</i>, were cultured and inoculated into the pre-treated dentinal canals, which were then incubated for 16 days. Following this, the canals were subjected to the respective irrigation protocols. Bacterial counts were assessed using sterile paper points and culture techniques post-irrigation. Additionally, four non-inoculated root canals were used as negative controls for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EndoUltra achieved the highest reduction in Total Bacterial Count (TBC) with a median decrease of 75% (interquartile range [IQR]: 70-80%), significantly better than XP Finisher (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and Irriflex (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Eddy led to a reduction in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PA) with a median decrease of 85% (IQR: 80-90%), significantly outperforming Irriflex (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and XP Finisher (<i>p</i> = 0.001). For <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (EF), EndoUltra had a median reduction of 70% (IQR: 65-75%), significantly better than Eddy (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and Irriflex (<i>p</i> = 0.001), while XP Finisher resulted in a reduction of 60% (IQR: 55-65%). EndoUltra showed the highest reduction in <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> (ProM) with 80% (IQR: 75-85%), significantly better than Irriflex (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and XP Finisher (<i>p</i> = 0.001), with Eddy also better than Irriflex (<i>p</i> = 0.009). EndoUltra reduced <i>Candida albicans</i> (CA) by 65% (IQR: 60-70%), significantly outperforming XP Finisher (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and Eddy (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within its limitations, this study identified EndoUltra as highly effective in reducing bacterial counts, indicating its potential utility in disinfecting root canals. These findings underscore the significance of such methods in enhancing treatment outcomes and addressing root canal infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"12 ","pages":"43065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.43065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontic infections are biofilm-mediated, demanding effective biofilm eradication from the root canal. Root canal complexities, coupled with bacterial biofilm resistance, pose challenges to thorough disinfection. Irrigation, particularly with sodium hypochlorite, is crucial in endodontics. Activation techniques, like sonic or ultrasonic oscillations, enhance irrigant penetration and biofilm disruption, improving decontamination and treatment outcomes.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of XP Finisher, EndoUltra, Eddy and Irriflex in the reduction of the multispecies endodontic biofilm formed by Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans and Proteus mirabilis.

Methods: A total of 44 single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected and divided into groups for investigation: Group A: Irriflex, Group B: XP Finisher, Group C: Eddy system, and Group D: EndoUltra system. Multispecies biofilms, comprising Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans, were cultured and inoculated into the pre-treated dentinal canals, which were then incubated for 16 days. Following this, the canals were subjected to the respective irrigation protocols. Bacterial counts were assessed using sterile paper points and culture techniques post-irrigation. Additionally, four non-inoculated root canals were used as negative controls for comparison.

Results: EndoUltra achieved the highest reduction in Total Bacterial Count (TBC) with a median decrease of 75% (interquartile range [IQR]: 70-80%), significantly better than XP Finisher (p = 0.001) and Irriflex (p = 0.001). Eddy led to a reduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) with a median decrease of 85% (IQR: 80-90%), significantly outperforming Irriflex (p = 0.001) and XP Finisher (p = 0.001). For Enterococcus faecalis (EF), EndoUltra had a median reduction of 70% (IQR: 65-75%), significantly better than Eddy (p = 0.01) and Irriflex (p = 0.001), while XP Finisher resulted in a reduction of 60% (IQR: 55-65%). EndoUltra showed the highest reduction in Proteus mirabilis (ProM) with 80% (IQR: 75-85%), significantly better than Irriflex (p = 0.001) and XP Finisher (p = 0.001), with Eddy also better than Irriflex (p = 0.009). EndoUltra reduced Candida albicans (CA) by 65% (IQR: 60-70%), significantly outperforming XP Finisher (p = 0.001) and Eddy (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Within its limitations, this study identified EndoUltra as highly effective in reducing bacterial counts, indicating its potential utility in disinfecting root canals. These findings underscore the significance of such methods in enhancing treatment outcomes and addressing root canal infections.

不同灌洗激活方式对工程牙髓生物膜的作用:体外研究。
根管感染是由生物膜介导的,需要有效地清除根管中的生物膜。根管的复杂性,加上细菌生物膜的耐药性,对彻底消毒提出了挑战。冲洗,特别是次氯酸钠,在牙髓学中是至关重要的。激活技术,如声波或超声波振荡,增强灌溉水渗透和生物膜破坏,改善净化和治疗效果。本研究的目的是评估XP Finisher、EndoUltra、Eddy和Irriflex对粪肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、白色念珠菌和奇迹变形杆菌形成的多物种牙髓生物膜的减少效果。方法:选择44颗单根下颌前磨牙,分为A组:Irriflex组,B组:XP Finisher组,C组:Eddy系统组,D组:EndoUltra系统组。将粪肠球菌、神奇变形杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌组成的多物种生物膜培养并接种到预处理的牙髓管中,然后孵育16天。在此之后,运河受到各自的灌溉协议。使用无菌纸点和灌溉后培养技术评估细菌计数。另外,4个未接种根管作为阴性对照进行比较。结果:EndoUltra的总细菌计数(TBC)降低率最高,中位数降低75%(四分位数间距[IQR]: 70-80%),显著优于XP Finisher (p = 0.001)和Irriflex (p = 0.001)。Eddy减少了铜绿假单胞菌(PA),中位数减少了85% (IQR: 80-90%),显著优于Irriflex (p = 0.001)和XP Finisher (p = 0.001)。对于粪肠球菌(EF), EndoUltra的中位降低率为70% (IQR: 65-75%),显著优于Eddy (p = 0.01)和Irriflex (p = 0.001),而XP Finisher的中位降低率为60% (IQR: 55-65%)。EndoUltra对奇异变形杆菌(ProM)的降低率最高,为80% (IQR: 75-85%),显著优于Irriflex (p = 0.001)和XP Finisher (p = 0.001), Eddy也优于Irriflex (p = 0.009)。EndoUltra减少白色念珠菌(CA) 65% (IQR: 60-70%),显著优于XP Finisher (p = 0.001)和Eddy (p = 0.001)。结论:在其局限性内,本研究确定EndoUltra在减少细菌数量方面非常有效,表明其在消毒根管方面的潜在用途。这些发现强调了这些方法在提高治疗效果和解决根管感染方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信