Impact of Intratympanic Gentamicin on Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004451
Robert Böscke, Jan Hoffmeyer, Andreas Radeloff
{"title":"Impact of Intratympanic Gentamicin on Cochlear Implant Outcomes.","authors":"Robert Böscke, Jan Hoffmeyer, Andreas Radeloff","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intratympanic gentamicin (ITG) instillation is a therapeutic option in advanced Menière's disease (MD) to control vertigo. ITG aims to induce vestibular hypofunction by selective ablation of vestibular hair cells. However, it may also adversely affect cochlear hair cells and the neural auditory pathway. Preservation of the neural auditory pathway is critical, as today cochlear implantation (CI) is the gold standard for auditory rehabilitation in patients with MD. This study assesses the impact of prior ITG treatment on CI outcomes in patients with MD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 36 CI recipients with MD. Patients were divided into two groups: ITG (n = 14) and Control (n = 22). Primary outcome measure was the CI-aided Freiburg monosyllabic words test at 65 dB SPL (WRS65[CI]) at follow-up visits T1 (0-3 months), T2 (3-6 months), and T3 (≥6 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements in aided WRS65 over time, with the ITG group exhibiting inferior outcomes compared to the control group (relative treatment effect [RTE] 0.38 [ITG] versus 0.57 [control]; p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis confirmed between-group differences in WRS65[CI] outcomes at all follow-up visits (T1: median 30% versus 46%, p = 0.012; T2: 40% versus 60%, p = 0.009; T3: 57.5% versus 72.5%, p = 0.027; ITG versus control group, respectively). A linear mixed-effects model demonstrated that ITG treatment was associated with lower WRS65[CI] outcomes (β = -18.85, p = 0.014), while other preimplantation hearing test results and age at implantation did not show significant effects on the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ITG treatment was associated with worse CI outcomes in MD patients. We recommend that patients should be counseled regarding the potential adverse effects of ITG on the neural auditory pathway that may lead to inferior CI outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 5","pages":"494-498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intratympanic gentamicin (ITG) instillation is a therapeutic option in advanced Menière's disease (MD) to control vertigo. ITG aims to induce vestibular hypofunction by selective ablation of vestibular hair cells. However, it may also adversely affect cochlear hair cells and the neural auditory pathway. Preservation of the neural auditory pathway is critical, as today cochlear implantation (CI) is the gold standard for auditory rehabilitation in patients with MD. This study assesses the impact of prior ITG treatment on CI outcomes in patients with MD.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 36 CI recipients with MD. Patients were divided into two groups: ITG (n = 14) and Control (n = 22). Primary outcome measure was the CI-aided Freiburg monosyllabic words test at 65 dB SPL (WRS65[CI]) at follow-up visits T1 (0-3 months), T2 (3-6 months), and T3 (≥6 months).

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in aided WRS65 over time, with the ITG group exhibiting inferior outcomes compared to the control group (relative treatment effect [RTE] 0.38 [ITG] versus 0.57 [control]; p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis confirmed between-group differences in WRS65[CI] outcomes at all follow-up visits (T1: median 30% versus 46%, p = 0.012; T2: 40% versus 60%, p = 0.009; T3: 57.5% versus 72.5%, p = 0.027; ITG versus control group, respectively). A linear mixed-effects model demonstrated that ITG treatment was associated with lower WRS65[CI] outcomes (β = -18.85, p = 0.014), while other preimplantation hearing test results and age at implantation did not show significant effects on the outcome.

Conclusion: ITG treatment was associated with worse CI outcomes in MD patients. We recommend that patients should be counseled regarding the potential adverse effects of ITG on the neural auditory pathway that may lead to inferior CI outcomes.

鼓室内庆大霉素对人工耳蜗植入结果的影响。
腹膜内滴注庆大霉素(ITG)是晚期meni病(MD)控制眩晕的一种治疗选择。ITG的目的是通过选择性消融前庭毛细胞来诱导前庭功能减退。然而,它也可能对耳蜗毛细胞和神经听觉通路产生不利影响。保留神经听觉通路是至关重要的,因为今天人工耳蜗植入(CI)是MD患者听觉康复的金标准。本研究评估了先前的ITG治疗对MD患者CI结果的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括36名MD患者的CI接受者。患者分为两组:ITG (n = 14)和对照组(n = 22)。主要结局指标为随访T1(0-3个月)、T2(3-6个月)和T3(≥6个月)时65 dB SPL的CI辅助Freiburg单音节单词测试(WRS65[CI])。结果:随着时间的推移,两组辅助WRS65均有显著改善,与对照组相比,ITG组表现出较差的结果(相对治疗效果[RTE] 0.38 [ITG]对0.57[对照组];P < 0.001)。事后分析证实了WRS65[CI]结果在所有随访时的组间差异(T1:中位数30% vs 46%, p = 0.012;T2: 40% vs 60%, p = 0.009;T3: 57.5% vs . 72.5%, p = 0.027;ITG组和对照组)。线性混合效应模型显示,ITG治疗与较低的WRS65[CI]结果相关(β = -18.85, p = 0.014),而其他种植前听力测试结果和种植年龄对结果没有显着影响。结论:ITG治疗与MD患者较差的CI结果相关。我们建议应告知患者ITG对神经听觉通路的潜在不良影响,这可能导致较差的CI结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信