Determining the Diagnostic Value of DWIBS in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions Compared to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 0.7 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Advanced biomedical research Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/abr.abr_283_24
Maryam Farghadani, Safura Mozafari, Maryam Riahinejad, Mashid Haghighi, Reza Eshraghi Samani, Amir Mohammad Taravati, Koushan Rostami, Seyedeh Ghazal Shahrokh, Arezoo Sadeghian
{"title":"Determining the Diagnostic Value of DWIBS in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions Compared to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Maryam Farghadani, Safura Mozafari, Maryam Riahinejad, Mashid Haghighi, Reza Eshraghi Samani, Amir Mohammad Taravati, Koushan Rostami, Seyedeh Ghazal Shahrokh, Arezoo Sadeghian","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_283_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) is a new imaging tool for the diagnosis of breast lesions. This study aims to compare DWIBS with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) sequences.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty consecutive patients underwent both CE-MRI and DWIBS images. DWIBS was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively using the apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. A threshold of 1.44 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s was considered as a cutoff value between malignant and benign lesions. CE-MRI images were evaluated based on a combination of kinetic and morphological information and reported using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Statistical analysis was performed for both sequences based on pathologic findings as a gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five out of 80 lesions (69%) were benign, and 25 malignant lesions (31%) have been reported. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CE-MRI were 100, 38, 42, and 100%, respectively, and those for DWIBS were 77, 70, 53, and 87%, respectively. By comparing DWIBS and CE-MRI data, no statistically significant difference was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DWIBS can be used as an effective alternative for breast CE-MRI in cases of contradictions of IV contrast injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94292,"journal":{"name":"Advanced biomedical research","volume":"14 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_283_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) is a new imaging tool for the diagnosis of breast lesions. This study aims to compare DWIBS with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) sequences.

Materials and methods: Eighty consecutive patients underwent both CE-MRI and DWIBS images. DWIBS was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively using the apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. A threshold of 1.44 × 10-3 mm2/s was considered as a cutoff value between malignant and benign lesions. CE-MRI images were evaluated based on a combination of kinetic and morphological information and reported using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Statistical analysis was performed for both sequences based on pathologic findings as a gold standard.

Results: Fifty-five out of 80 lesions (69%) were benign, and 25 malignant lesions (31%) have been reported. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CE-MRI were 100, 38, 42, and 100%, respectively, and those for DWIBS were 77, 70, 53, and 87%, respectively. By comparing DWIBS and CE-MRI data, no statistically significant difference was reported.

Conclusion: DWIBS can be used as an effective alternative for breast CE-MRI in cases of contradictions of IV contrast injection.

与动态增强MRI相比,DWIBS对乳腺病变的诊断价值:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:带有背景体信号抑制的弥散加权成像(DWIBS)是一种诊断乳腺病变的新型成像工具。本研究旨在比较DWIBS与对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)序列。材料和方法:连续80例患者同时进行CE-MRI和DWIBS成像。采用表观扩散系数图对DWIBS进行定性和定量评价。1.44 × 10-3 mm2/s的阈值被认为是恶性和良性病变之间的临界值。基于动力学和形态学信息对CE-MRI图像进行评估,并使用乳腺成像报告和数据系统词典进行报告。以病理结果为金标准,对两个序列进行统计分析。结果:80例病变中55例(69%)为良性,25例(31%)为恶性。CE-MRI的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100、38、42和100%,DWIBS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为77、70、53和87%。DWIBS与CE-MRI数据比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:DWIBS在静脉注射造影剂有矛盾的情况下,可作为乳腺增强磁共振的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信