Acute intraocular pressure responses changes during dynamic resistance training in primary open-angle glaucoma patients and age-matched controls.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
María Dolores Morenas-Aguilar, Cristina González-Hernández, Daniel Marcos-Frutos, Sergio Miras-Moreno, María José López-Gómez, Amador García-Ramos, Jesús Vera
{"title":"Acute intraocular pressure responses changes during dynamic resistance training in primary open-angle glaucoma patients and age-matched controls.","authors":"María Dolores Morenas-Aguilar, Cristina González-Hernández, Daniel Marcos-Frutos, Sergio Miras-Moreno, María José López-Gómez, Amador García-Ramos, Jesús Vera","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06814-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical exercise has been proposed as a feasible strategy for preventing and managing glaucoma by modulating intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). The primary objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess the IOP and OPP responses to dynamic resistance exercises (leg extension and biceps curl).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (age = 68.9 ± 8.1 years) and 18 healthy age-matched controls (age = 69.6 ± 5.9 years) were recruited. Participants performed one set of 10 repetitions of both exercises at low- (light bar) and moderate-intensity (15RM). IOP and blood pressure were measured at baseline and after 1 and 5 min of passive recovery. Additionally, IOP was measured during training after each of the 10 repetitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data showed a progressive IOP increase throughout the sets of leg extension and biceps curl exercises when performed at moderate intensity (p < 0.001). Remarkably, POAG patients showed a smaller IOP increase compared to controls (p = 0.048). The between-group differences for IOP changes were higher during the 10 exercise repetitions at moderate-intensity for both leg extension (average IOP rise: POAG = 0.3 ± 0.6 mmHg vs. control = 2.3 ± 0.7 mmHg) and biceps curl (average IOP rise: POAG = 1.4 ± 0.6 mmHg vs. control = 3.4 ± 0.8 mmHg) exercises. No changes in OPP were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that moderate-intensity dynamic resistance training is a safe intervention for potentially improving physical fitness in medically treated POAG patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06814-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical exercise has been proposed as a feasible strategy for preventing and managing glaucoma by modulating intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). The primary objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess the IOP and OPP responses to dynamic resistance exercises (leg extension and biceps curl).

Methods: Twenty-six patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (age = 68.9 ± 8.1 years) and 18 healthy age-matched controls (age = 69.6 ± 5.9 years) were recruited. Participants performed one set of 10 repetitions of both exercises at low- (light bar) and moderate-intensity (15RM). IOP and blood pressure were measured at baseline and after 1 and 5 min of passive recovery. Additionally, IOP was measured during training after each of the 10 repetitions.

Results: Our data showed a progressive IOP increase throughout the sets of leg extension and biceps curl exercises when performed at moderate intensity (p < 0.001). Remarkably, POAG patients showed a smaller IOP increase compared to controls (p = 0.048). The between-group differences for IOP changes were higher during the 10 exercise repetitions at moderate-intensity for both leg extension (average IOP rise: POAG = 0.3 ± 0.6 mmHg vs. control = 2.3 ± 0.7 mmHg) and biceps curl (average IOP rise: POAG = 1.4 ± 0.6 mmHg vs. control = 3.4 ± 0.8 mmHg) exercises. No changes in OPP were observed.

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that moderate-intensity dynamic resistance training is a safe intervention for potentially improving physical fitness in medically treated POAG patients.

原发性开角型青光眼患者和年龄匹配对照组动态阻力训练时急性眼压反应的变化。
背景:体育锻炼被认为是通过调节眼内压(IOP)和眼灌注压(OPP)来预防和治疗青光眼的可行策略。本横断面研究的主要目的是评估眼内压和眼内压对动态阻力运动(腿部伸展和肱二头肌弯曲)的反应。方法:选取26例原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者(年龄= 68.9±8.1岁)和18例年龄匹配的健康对照(年龄= 69.6±5.9岁)。参与者在低强度(光杆)和中等强度(15RM)下进行一组10次重复的锻炼。在基线和被动恢复1和5分钟后测量IOP和血压。此外,在每10次重复训练后测量IOP。结果:我们的数据显示,在中等强度的腿部伸展和肱二头肌弯曲训练中,IOP逐渐增加(p)。结论:本研究结果表明,中等强度的动态阻力训练是一种安全的干预措施,可以改善经医学治疗的POAG患者的身体素质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信