Piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems for 30-day mortality in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections: a retrospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, cohort study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Thomas Sahlström Månsson, Alice Askemyr, Torgny Sunnerhagen, Johan Tham, Kristian Riesbeck, Lisa Mellhammar
{"title":"Piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems for 30-day mortality in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections: a retrospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, cohort study.","authors":"Thomas Sahlström Månsson, Alice Askemyr, Torgny Sunnerhagen, Johan Tham, Kristian Riesbeck, Lisa Mellhammar","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02496-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance increases with the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Studies evaluating antibiotic stewardship are in high demand. Is piperacillin/tazobactam non-inferior to carbapenems regarding 30-day mortality among patients with bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, cohort study assessed adult patients with bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in southern Sweden from 2013 to 2022. Patients were categorized according to the first therapy they received two consecutive doses of (piperacillin/tazobactam or a carbapenem). The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, measured from when the positive blood cultures were taken. The absolute risk difference for this outcome was calculated for all patients, and two propensity score matched cohorts (empirical and effective), with two different delta limits (5% and 2%). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit admission, early clinical response, superinfections, relapsed infection and one-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 644 patients were included. In the piperacillin/tazobactam group, 26/309 patients met the primary outcome, compared to 27/335 patients in the carbapenem group. The absolute risk difference (-0.4%) was statistically significant in the propensity score matched empirical cohort [1-sided 97.5% confidence interval]: -∞ to 4.0, p = 0.008). Piperacillin/tazobactam was non-inferior to carbapenems for all the secondary outcomes in the same cohort, except for the early clinical response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that piperacillin/tazobactam is non-inferior to carbapenems for treating extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections, with an acceptable 5% increase in 30-day mortality. We suggest that piperacillin/tazobactam should be used more frequently to decrease antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02496-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Antimicrobial resistance increases with the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Studies evaluating antibiotic stewardship are in high demand. Is piperacillin/tazobactam non-inferior to carbapenems regarding 30-day mortality among patients with bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales?

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, cohort study assessed adult patients with bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in southern Sweden from 2013 to 2022. Patients were categorized according to the first therapy they received two consecutive doses of (piperacillin/tazobactam or a carbapenem). The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, measured from when the positive blood cultures were taken. The absolute risk difference for this outcome was calculated for all patients, and two propensity score matched cohorts (empirical and effective), with two different delta limits (5% and 2%). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit admission, early clinical response, superinfections, relapsed infection and one-year mortality.

Results: A total of 644 patients were included. In the piperacillin/tazobactam group, 26/309 patients met the primary outcome, compared to 27/335 patients in the carbapenem group. The absolute risk difference (-0.4%) was statistically significant in the propensity score matched empirical cohort [1-sided 97.5% confidence interval]: -∞ to 4.0, p = 0.008). Piperacillin/tazobactam was non-inferior to carbapenems for all the secondary outcomes in the same cohort, except for the early clinical response.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that piperacillin/tazobactam is non-inferior to carbapenems for treating extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections, with an acceptable 5% increase in 30-day mortality. We suggest that piperacillin/tazobactam should be used more frequently to decrease antimicrobial resistance.

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类对产esbl肠杆菌血流感染患者30天死亡率的影响:一项回顾性、多中心、非劣效性队列研究
目的:抗菌素耐药性随着广谱抗生素的使用而增加。评估抗生素管理的研究需求很大。在广谱β -内酰胺酶产生肠杆菌引起的血流感染患者的30天死亡率方面,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦是否不逊于碳青霉烯类?方法:这项回顾性、多中心、非劣效性队列研究评估了2013年至2022年瑞典南部由广谱产β -内酰胺酶肠杆菌引起的成人血液感染患者。患者根据第一次治疗进行分类,他们接受了两个连续剂量(哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或碳青霉烯)。主要结果是30天全因死亡率,从采集阳性血培养开始测量。该结果的绝对风险差异计算了所有患者,两个倾向评分匹配的队列(经验和有效),具有两个不同的增量极限(5%和2%)。次要结局包括重症监护病房入院、早期临床反应、重复感染、复发感染和一年内死亡率。结果:共纳入644例患者。在哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组中,26/309例患者达到了主要终点,而碳青霉烯组为27/335例。在倾向评分匹配的经验队列中,绝对风险差异(-0.4%)具有统计学意义[单侧97.5%置信区间]:-∞至4.0,p = 0.008]。在同一队列中,除早期临床反应外,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的所有次要结局均不逊于碳青霉烯类药物。结论:我们的研究结果表明,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在治疗广谱产生β -内酰胺酶的肠杆菌血液感染方面并不亚于碳青霉烯类药物,30天死亡率可增加5%。我们建议应更频繁地使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦以减少抗菌素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信