Effects of self-similarity and self-generation on the perceptual prioritization of voices.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Victor Rosi, Bryony Payne, Carolyn McGettigan
{"title":"Effects of self-similarity and self-generation on the perceptual prioritization of voices.","authors":"Victor Rosi, Bryony Payne, Carolyn McGettigan","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The self-prioritization effect (SPE) reflects the ability to efficiently discern self-relevant information. The self-voice emerges as a crucial identity marker because of its inherent self-relevance, and previous work has demonstrated the perceptual and cognitive advantages of the self-voice over other voices. Yet, the extent to which humans prioritize their self-voice when they hear it is because it is both self-similar (\"That sounds like my voice\") and self-generated (\"I said that\") remains understudied. Here, we examined the impacts of self-similarity and self-generation on the SPE through three experiments. In each experiment, participants learned associations between three voices and three identities (self, friend, and other), and then performed a task requiring them to perceptually match the heard voices with visual labels (\"you,\" \"friend,\" and \"stranger\"). Experiment 1 revealed an augmented SPE when the self-associated voice in the task was the participant's own self-similar and self-generated voice. In Experiment 2, the SPE was diminished when the self-voice was associated with the \"stranger\" label-here, the other-associated, but self-similar and self-generated, voice was similarly prioritized to a self-associated but unfamiliar voice. In Experiment 3, we investigated the role of self-generation, by associating the self with a self-similar but machine-generated audio clone of the participant. The SPE was again enhanced. In sum, we demonstrate that listeners show flexibility in their mental representation of self, where multiple sources of self-related information in the voice can be jointly and severally prioritized, independently of self-generation. These findings have implications for the application of self-voice cloning within voice-mediated technologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The self-prioritization effect (SPE) reflects the ability to efficiently discern self-relevant information. The self-voice emerges as a crucial identity marker because of its inherent self-relevance, and previous work has demonstrated the perceptual and cognitive advantages of the self-voice over other voices. Yet, the extent to which humans prioritize their self-voice when they hear it is because it is both self-similar ("That sounds like my voice") and self-generated ("I said that") remains understudied. Here, we examined the impacts of self-similarity and self-generation on the SPE through three experiments. In each experiment, participants learned associations between three voices and three identities (self, friend, and other), and then performed a task requiring them to perceptually match the heard voices with visual labels ("you," "friend," and "stranger"). Experiment 1 revealed an augmented SPE when the self-associated voice in the task was the participant's own self-similar and self-generated voice. In Experiment 2, the SPE was diminished when the self-voice was associated with the "stranger" label-here, the other-associated, but self-similar and self-generated, voice was similarly prioritized to a self-associated but unfamiliar voice. In Experiment 3, we investigated the role of self-generation, by associating the self with a self-similar but machine-generated audio clone of the participant. The SPE was again enhanced. In sum, we demonstrate that listeners show flexibility in their mental representation of self, where multiple sources of self-related information in the voice can be jointly and severally prioritized, independently of self-generation. These findings have implications for the application of self-voice cloning within voice-mediated technologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

自相似和自我生成对声音感知优先级的影响。
自我优先化效应(SPE)反映了个体有效识别自我相关信息的能力。自我声音由于其固有的自我相关性而成为一个重要的身份标记,并且先前的研究已经证明了自我声音相对于其他声音的感知和认知优势。然而,人类在多大程度上优先考虑自己的声音,是因为它既是自我相似的(“那听起来像我的声音”),也是自我产生的(“我说过”),这一点仍未得到充分研究。本文通过三个实验考察了自相似和自生成对SPE的影响。在每个实验中,参与者学习三种声音和三种身份(自我、朋友和他人)之间的联系,然后执行一项任务,要求他们感知地将听到的声音与视觉标签(“你”、“朋友”和“陌生人”)相匹配。实验1显示,当任务中自我关联的声音是参与者自己的自相似和自生成的声音时,SPE增强。在实验2中,当自我声音与“陌生人”标签相关联时,SPE被削弱——这里,与他人相关但自我相似和自我产生的声音同样优先于与自我相关但不熟悉的声音。在实验3中,我们通过将自我与参与者的自我相似但由机器生成的音频克隆相关联,研究了自我生成的作用。SPE再次得到提高。总之,我们证明了听者在自我的心理表征中表现出灵活性,在这种情况下,声音中与自我相关的多个信息来源可以共同或单独优先考虑,独立于自我产生。这些发现对语音介导技术中自我语音克隆的应用具有启示意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信