Comparative Study of Preprocedure and Real-Time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Obese Patients.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_371_24
R Anand, G K Ram, A Kumar, M Kumar, A Aman, B Naskar
{"title":"Comparative Study of Preprocedure and Real-Time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Obese Patients.","authors":"R Anand, G K Ram, A Kumar, M Kumar, A Aman, B Naskar","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_371_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is a great challenge to perform regional anesthesia in obese patients. In general, combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia is performed blindly using the surface landmark of the midline approach. Obesity masks the surface landmark and makes the procedure difficult.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and ease of the real-time ultrasound (USG)-guided CSE (RUC) and preprocedure USG-guided CSE (PUC) approach in obese patients.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This prospective randomized intervention study was conducted at a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Grade II and III and a body mass index >30 kg.m -2 were included in the study, and randomly, they were assigned into two groups: PUC and RUC groups. The main focus of the study was on the initial effort to position an epidural catheter and administer a subarachnoid block effectively. The secondary outcomes included the number of attempts, the number of passes made, the time needed to identify the epidural space (measured in seconds), and the time it took to place the epidural catheter (measured in seconds) successfully.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 80 patients, 77 patients were randomly allocated between two groups for the final analysis. The PUC group received 39, and the RUC group received 38 patients. The median number of attempts was 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-4] and 2 (IQR 1-2), respectively, in the PUC and RUC groups (P < 0.001). Compared to the PUC group, the RUC group showed a statistically significant reduction in the median number of passes, the time taken for space identification, and the time required for successful epidural catheter placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the comparison between the PUC and RUC groups, the PUC group demonstrated significantly longer durations for space identification, required more attempts, had a greater number of passes, and exhibited a prolonged time for successful epidural catheter placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"28 3","pages":"273-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_371_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is a great challenge to perform regional anesthesia in obese patients. In general, combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia is performed blindly using the surface landmark of the midline approach. Obesity masks the surface landmark and makes the procedure difficult.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and ease of the real-time ultrasound (USG)-guided CSE (RUC) and preprocedure USG-guided CSE (PUC) approach in obese patients.

Settings and design: This prospective randomized intervention study was conducted at a tertiary care center.

Methods: Eighty patients with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Grade II and III and a body mass index >30 kg.m -2 were included in the study, and randomly, they were assigned into two groups: PUC and RUC groups. The main focus of the study was on the initial effort to position an epidural catheter and administer a subarachnoid block effectively. The secondary outcomes included the number of attempts, the number of passes made, the time needed to identify the epidural space (measured in seconds), and the time it took to place the epidural catheter (measured in seconds) successfully.

Results: Out of 80 patients, 77 patients were randomly allocated between two groups for the final analysis. The PUC group received 39, and the RUC group received 38 patients. The median number of attempts was 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-4] and 2 (IQR 1-2), respectively, in the PUC and RUC groups (P < 0.001). Compared to the PUC group, the RUC group showed a statistically significant reduction in the median number of passes, the time taken for space identification, and the time required for successful epidural catheter placement.

Conclusions: In the comparison between the PUC and RUC groups, the PUC group demonstrated significantly longer durations for space identification, required more attempts, had a greater number of passes, and exhibited a prolonged time for successful epidural catheter placement.

肥胖症患者术前与实时超声引导下脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉的比较研究。
背景:对肥胖患者实施区域麻醉是一个巨大的挑战。一般来说,脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉(CSE)是使用中线入路的表面标记进行的盲目麻醉。肥胖掩盖了表面标记,使手术变得困难。目的:本研究旨在比较实时超声(USG)引导下的CSE (RUC)与术前USG引导下的CSE (PUC)在肥胖患者中的疗效和易用性。环境和设计:本前瞻性随机干预研究在三级保健中心进行。方法:80例美国麻醉学会分级为II级和III级,体重指数bbb30 kg的患者。m -2纳入研究,随机分为两组:PUC组和RUC组。该研究的主要重点是初步努力定位硬膜外导管和有效地实施蛛网膜下腔阻滞。次要结果包括尝试次数,通过次数,识别硬膜外空间所需的时间(以秒计),以及成功放置硬膜外导管所需的时间(以秒计)。结果:80例患者中,77例患者被随机分为两组进行最终分析。PUC组39例,RUC组38例。PUC组和RUC组的中位尝试次数分别为4次[四分位间距(IQR) 2-4]和2次(IQR 1-2) (P < 0.001)。与PUC组相比,RUC组在中位通过次数、空间识别时间和成功放置硬膜外导管所需时间上均有统计学意义的减少。结论:在PUC组和RUC组的比较中,PUC组明显表现出更长的空间识别时间,需要更多的尝试,有更多的通过次数,并表现出更长的时间成功放置硬膜外导管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信