A geophysics-informed pro-poor approach to earthquake risk management.

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Natural Hazards Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s11069-024-06983-6
Himanshu Agrawal, Chenbo Wang, Gemma Cremen, John McCloskey
{"title":"A geophysics-informed pro-poor approach to earthquake risk management.","authors":"Himanshu Agrawal, Chenbo Wang, Gemma Cremen, John McCloskey","doi":"10.1007/s11069-024-06983-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent earthquake disasters have highlighted an urgent need for continuous advancements in approaches to reducing seismic risk. Decision-making on such strategies should consider subsurface geophysical information (e.g., seismic site response), given its direct link to seismic hazard. This may be particularly important in regions where the poorest in society often reside in areas with softer soils that lead to higher ground-motion amplifications. In this context, we propose a framework to support decision-making on earthquake risk policies, which explicitly integrates information on the geophysics of an urban system as well as its physical and social environment. The framework is based on the Tomorrow's Cities Decision Support Environment, which was designed to support urban planning with a focus on pro-poor disaster risk reduction in countries of the Global South. It is further underpinned by a cost-benefit analysis, which facilitates the assessment of potential policies in terms of both their ability to reduce earthquake risk as well as their value for (often limited) money. We illustrate the framework using a well-established virtual urban testbed based on Global South cities, which reveals that geophysics-informed policy making can successfully lead to pro-poor earthquake risk reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18792,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards","volume":"121 6","pages":"6901-6919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06983-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent earthquake disasters have highlighted an urgent need for continuous advancements in approaches to reducing seismic risk. Decision-making on such strategies should consider subsurface geophysical information (e.g., seismic site response), given its direct link to seismic hazard. This may be particularly important in regions where the poorest in society often reside in areas with softer soils that lead to higher ground-motion amplifications. In this context, we propose a framework to support decision-making on earthquake risk policies, which explicitly integrates information on the geophysics of an urban system as well as its physical and social environment. The framework is based on the Tomorrow's Cities Decision Support Environment, which was designed to support urban planning with a focus on pro-poor disaster risk reduction in countries of the Global South. It is further underpinned by a cost-benefit analysis, which facilitates the assessment of potential policies in terms of both their ability to reduce earthquake risk as well as their value for (often limited) money. We illustrate the framework using a well-established virtual urban testbed based on Global South cities, which reveals that geophysics-informed policy making can successfully lead to pro-poor earthquake risk reduction.

地震风险管理的地球物理学扶贫方法。
最近的地震灾害突出表明,迫切需要在减少地震风险的方法上不断取得进展。这种战略的决策应考虑地下地球物理信息(例如,地震现场反应),因为它与地震危险有直接联系。在社会上最贫穷的人往往居住在土壤较软、地面运动放大较大的地区,这一点可能特别重要。在此背景下,我们提出了一个框架来支持地震风险政策的决策,该框架明确整合了城市系统的地球物理信息及其物理和社会环境。该框架以“未来城市决策支持环境”为基础,旨在支持城市规划,重点关注全球南方国家的扶贫减灾工作。它还得到了成本效益分析的进一步支持,该分析有助于从降低地震风险的能力以及(通常是有限的)资金价值两方面评估潜在政策。我们使用一个基于全球南方城市的完善的虚拟城市试验台来说明该框架,这表明地球物理学知情的政策制定可以成功地减少有利于穷人的地震风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Hazards
Natural Hazards 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
568
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Natural Hazards is devoted to original research work on all aspects of natural hazards, the forecasting of catastrophic events, their risk management, and the nature of precursors of natural and/or technological hazards. Although the origin of hazards can be different sources and systems (atmospheric, hydrologic, oceanographic, volcanologic, seismic, neotectonic), the environmental impacts are equally catastrophic. This circumstance warrants a tight interaction between the different scientific and operational disciplines, which should enhance the mitigation of hazards. Hazards of interest to the journal are included in the following sections: general, atmospheric, climatological, oceanographic, storm surges, tsunamis, floods, snow, avalanches, landslides, erosion, earthquakes, volcanoes, man-made, technological, and risk assessment. The interactions between these hazards and society are also addressed in the journal and include risk governance, disaster response and preventive actions such as spatial planning and remedial measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信