Jenna Grieshop, Emma Warr, Ashleigh Walesa, Katherine Hemsworth, Joseph Carroll
{"title":"Poster Session: Deviation mapping for foveal cone mosaic topography.","authors":"Jenna Grieshop, Emma Warr, Ashleigh Walesa, Katherine Hemsworth, Joseph Carroll","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.5.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deviation mapping is commonly used across retinal imaging modalities. Here we compiled data from two labs (UC Berkley[1] & MCW) to create an AOSLO-specific deviation mapping tool for measures of the foveal cone mosaic. Foveal cones were identified for 87 normative regions of interest (ROIs) (26M, 61F; 13-67 yrs, median=26 yrs) and for 5 pathological ROIs (2 Bornholm Eye Disease, 3 Albinism; 1M, 4F; 16-50 yrs, median=42 yrs). ROIs were cropped and resized to a common scale for comparison. Density and nearest neighbor distance (NND) maps were generated for each ROI, and the cone density centroid[2] (CDC) was determined for each map. Normative maps were aligned using these CDC locations, and average and standard deviation (SD) maps were created for both density and NND. Pathology maps were compared to these normative composite maps. At the CDC, average (SD) density was 1.79E+5 (2.55E+4) cones/mm^2 and average (SD) NND was 2.08 (0.16) µm. For pathological ROIs, the percentage of pixels within 1 SD of the normative data was comparable for density and NND except in two individuals where density was more deviant than NND (consistent with mosaic irregularity and/or random cone loss). Deviation mapping applied to foveal AOSLO data can be used to assess the normality of individual foveal ROIs. Comparing deviation maps across different metrics may provide valuable insight into the underlying properties of the cone mosaic in various retinal pathologies. 1) PMID:31348002 2) PMID:34343479.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 5","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deviation mapping is commonly used across retinal imaging modalities. Here we compiled data from two labs (UC Berkley[1] & MCW) to create an AOSLO-specific deviation mapping tool for measures of the foveal cone mosaic. Foveal cones were identified for 87 normative regions of interest (ROIs) (26M, 61F; 13-67 yrs, median=26 yrs) and for 5 pathological ROIs (2 Bornholm Eye Disease, 3 Albinism; 1M, 4F; 16-50 yrs, median=42 yrs). ROIs were cropped and resized to a common scale for comparison. Density and nearest neighbor distance (NND) maps were generated for each ROI, and the cone density centroid[2] (CDC) was determined for each map. Normative maps were aligned using these CDC locations, and average and standard deviation (SD) maps were created for both density and NND. Pathology maps were compared to these normative composite maps. At the CDC, average (SD) density was 1.79E+5 (2.55E+4) cones/mm^2 and average (SD) NND was 2.08 (0.16) µm. For pathological ROIs, the percentage of pixels within 1 SD of the normative data was comparable for density and NND except in two individuals where density was more deviant than NND (consistent with mosaic irregularity and/or random cone loss). Deviation mapping applied to foveal AOSLO data can be used to assess the normality of individual foveal ROIs. Comparing deviation maps across different metrics may provide valuable insight into the underlying properties of the cone mosaic in various retinal pathologies. 1) PMID:31348002 2) PMID:34343479.
期刊介绍:
Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception,
low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.