Poster Session: Deviation mapping for foveal cone mosaic topography.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jenna Grieshop, Emma Warr, Ashleigh Walesa, Katherine Hemsworth, Joseph Carroll
{"title":"Poster Session: Deviation mapping for foveal cone mosaic topography.","authors":"Jenna Grieshop, Emma Warr, Ashleigh Walesa, Katherine Hemsworth, Joseph Carroll","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.5.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deviation mapping is commonly used across retinal imaging modalities. Here we compiled data from two labs (UC Berkley[1] & MCW) to create an AOSLO-specific deviation mapping tool for measures of the foveal cone mosaic. Foveal cones were identified for 87 normative regions of interest (ROIs) (26M, 61F; 13-67 yrs, median=26 yrs) and for 5 pathological ROIs (2 Bornholm Eye Disease, 3 Albinism; 1M, 4F; 16-50 yrs, median=42 yrs). ROIs were cropped and resized to a common scale for comparison. Density and nearest neighbor distance (NND) maps were generated for each ROI, and the cone density centroid[2] (CDC) was determined for each map. Normative maps were aligned using these CDC locations, and average and standard deviation (SD) maps were created for both density and NND. Pathology maps were compared to these normative composite maps. At the CDC, average (SD) density was 1.79E+5 (2.55E+4) cones/mm^2 and average (SD) NND was 2.08 (0.16) µm. For pathological ROIs, the percentage of pixels within 1 SD of the normative data was comparable for density and NND except in two individuals where density was more deviant than NND (consistent with mosaic irregularity and/or random cone loss). Deviation mapping applied to foveal AOSLO data can be used to assess the normality of individual foveal ROIs. Comparing deviation maps across different metrics may provide valuable insight into the underlying properties of the cone mosaic in various retinal pathologies. 1) PMID:31348002 2) PMID:34343479.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 5","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deviation mapping is commonly used across retinal imaging modalities. Here we compiled data from two labs (UC Berkley[1] & MCW) to create an AOSLO-specific deviation mapping tool for measures of the foveal cone mosaic. Foveal cones were identified for 87 normative regions of interest (ROIs) (26M, 61F; 13-67 yrs, median=26 yrs) and for 5 pathological ROIs (2 Bornholm Eye Disease, 3 Albinism; 1M, 4F; 16-50 yrs, median=42 yrs). ROIs were cropped and resized to a common scale for comparison. Density and nearest neighbor distance (NND) maps were generated for each ROI, and the cone density centroid[2] (CDC) was determined for each map. Normative maps were aligned using these CDC locations, and average and standard deviation (SD) maps were created for both density and NND. Pathology maps were compared to these normative composite maps. At the CDC, average (SD) density was 1.79E+5 (2.55E+4) cones/mm^2 and average (SD) NND was 2.08 (0.16) µm. For pathological ROIs, the percentage of pixels within 1 SD of the normative data was comparable for density and NND except in two individuals where density was more deviant than NND (consistent with mosaic irregularity and/or random cone loss). Deviation mapping applied to foveal AOSLO data can be used to assess the normality of individual foveal ROIs. Comparing deviation maps across different metrics may provide valuable insight into the underlying properties of the cone mosaic in various retinal pathologies. 1) PMID:31348002 2) PMID:34343479.

海报部分:中央凹锥体马赛克地形的偏移映射。
偏差映射是一种常用的视网膜成像方法。在这里,我们收集了来自两个实验室(加州大学伯克利分校[1]和MCW)的数据,以创建aoslo特定的偏差映射工具,用于测量中央凹锥体马赛克。在87个标准感兴趣区域(roi)中识别出中央凹锥体(26M, 61F;13-67岁,中位=26岁)和5例病理性roi(2例Bornholm眼病,3例白化病;1米4 f;16-50岁,中位数=42岁)。roi被裁剪和调整为一个通用的比例进行比较。为每个ROI生成密度和最近邻距离(NND)图,并确定每个图的锥密度质心[2](CDC)。使用这些CDC位置对齐标准地图,并创建密度和NND的平均和标准偏差(SD)地图。将病理图与这些规范的复合图进行比较。在CDC,平均(SD)密度为1.79E+5 (2.55E+4)锥/mm^2,平均(SD) NND为2.08(0.16)µm。对于病理性roi,除了两个个体的密度比NND更偏离(与马赛克不规则和/或随机锥体丢失一致)外,标准数据在1 SD内的像素百分比与密度和NND相当。应用于中央凹AOSLO数据的偏差映射可用于评估单个中央凹roi的正态性。比较不同指标的偏差图可以提供有价值的见解,了解各种视网膜病理中锥体马赛克的潜在特性。1) pmid:31348002 2) pmid:34343479
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信