Comprehensive analyses: Using machine learning models for mortality prediction in the intensive care unit of internal medicine.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ahmed Cihad Genç, Ensar Özmen, Deniz Çekiç, Kubilay İşsever, Fevziye Türkoğlu Genç, Ahmed Bilal Genç, Aysel Toçoğlu, Yusuf Durmaz, Hüseyin Özkök, Selçuk Yaylacı
{"title":"Comprehensive analyses: Using machine learning models for mortality prediction in the intensive care unit of internal medicine.","authors":"Ahmed Cihad Genç, Ensar Özmen, Deniz Çekiç, Kubilay İşsever, Fevziye Türkoğlu Genç, Ahmed Bilal Genç, Aysel Toçoğlu, Yusuf Durmaz, Hüseyin Özkök, Selçuk Yaylacı","doi":"10.1177/10815589251335327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mortality prediction in the intensive care unit (ICU) is essential in patient management. Emerging methods such as machine learning (ML) can be employed to predict ICU patients' mortality. Patients receiving treatment in the ICU of the internal medicine department were subjected to ML analysis upon admission, considering demographic, laboratory, and medical scores. Data from 787 internal medicine ICU patients were analyzed, with only a subset (220) included in the study for the 30-day mortality prediction model. The performance of boosting and Logistic Regression models in mortality prediction was compared. Categorical boosting (CatBoost) achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90, while extreme gradient boosting reached a maximum AUC of 0.85, and Logistic Regression attained the highest AUC of 0.83. Incorporating Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores with clinical and laboratory values, CatBoost demonstrated the strongest predictive performance with high sensitivity and specificity. In the ICU of the internal medicine department, it was concluded that the ML models successfully predict mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10815589251335327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589251335327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mortality prediction in the intensive care unit (ICU) is essential in patient management. Emerging methods such as machine learning (ML) can be employed to predict ICU patients' mortality. Patients receiving treatment in the ICU of the internal medicine department were subjected to ML analysis upon admission, considering demographic, laboratory, and medical scores. Data from 787 internal medicine ICU patients were analyzed, with only a subset (220) included in the study for the 30-day mortality prediction model. The performance of boosting and Logistic Regression models in mortality prediction was compared. Categorical boosting (CatBoost) achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90, while extreme gradient boosting reached a maximum AUC of 0.85, and Logistic Regression attained the highest AUC of 0.83. Incorporating Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores with clinical and laboratory values, CatBoost demonstrated the strongest predictive performance with high sensitivity and specificity. In the ICU of the internal medicine department, it was concluded that the ML models successfully predict mortality.

综合分析:利用机器学习模型预测内科重症监护病房的死亡率。
重症监护病房(ICU)的死亡率预测在患者管理中至关重要。机器学习(ML)等新兴方法可用于预测ICU患者的死亡率。在内科ICU接受治疗的患者在入院时进行ML分析,考虑人口统计学、实验室和医学评分。我们分析了787名内科ICU患者的数据,其中只有220名患者被纳入了30天死亡率预测模型。比较了boosting模型和Logistic回归模型在死亡率预测中的性能。分类增强法(CatBoost)的曲线下面积(AUC)最高为0.90,极端梯度增强法的曲线下面积(AUC)最高为0.85,逻辑回归法的曲线下面积(AUC)最高为0.83。结合急性生理和慢性健康评估II、简化急性生理评分II和序贯器官衰竭评估评分与临床和实验室值,CatBoost显示出最强的预测性能,具有高灵敏度和特异性。在内科ICU中,ML模型成功地预测了死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信