Current Controversies in Prenatal Diagnosis-Conference Debate 2024: All Fetuses Undergoing Fetal Therapy Should Have Exome Sequencing.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-13 DOI:10.1002/pd.6784
Teresa N Sparks, Rogelio Cruz Martinez, Tim Van Mieghem
{"title":"Current Controversies in Prenatal Diagnosis-Conference Debate 2024: All Fetuses Undergoing Fetal Therapy Should Have Exome Sequencing.","authors":"Teresa N Sparks, Rogelio Cruz Martinez, Tim Van Mieghem","doi":"10.1002/pd.6784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This manuscript summarises the debate held at the 2024 annual meeting of The International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD). Experts discussed whether all fetuses undergoing fetal therapy should undergo exome sequencing. Arguments in favor included that, with increasing experience and better clinical availability, exome sequencing can yield valuable diagnostic and prognostic information beyond what is available from karyotyping and microarray. This additional information is often helpful in counseling parents and provides a better understanding of fetal conditions, allowing for personalised medicine and supporting advancements in disease-focused fetal therapies. On the contrary, however, significant concerns regarding availability and health equity were raised. Moreover, potential delays in care incurred by exome sequencing may negatively affect outcomes of fetal intervention. Finally, as the information gathered from genetic testing may or may not affect pregnancy management decisions beyond termination of pregnancy, many families may choose not to undertake testing. The arguments of both debaters document current controversies in exome sequencing and genetic testing in general. This was also reflected in a divided audience vote at the end of the debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1351-1358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6784","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This manuscript summarises the debate held at the 2024 annual meeting of The International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD). Experts discussed whether all fetuses undergoing fetal therapy should undergo exome sequencing. Arguments in favor included that, with increasing experience and better clinical availability, exome sequencing can yield valuable diagnostic and prognostic information beyond what is available from karyotyping and microarray. This additional information is often helpful in counseling parents and provides a better understanding of fetal conditions, allowing for personalised medicine and supporting advancements in disease-focused fetal therapies. On the contrary, however, significant concerns regarding availability and health equity were raised. Moreover, potential delays in care incurred by exome sequencing may negatively affect outcomes of fetal intervention. Finally, as the information gathered from genetic testing may or may not affect pregnancy management decisions beyond termination of pregnancy, many families may choose not to undertake testing. The arguments of both debaters document current controversies in exome sequencing and genetic testing in general. This was also reflected in a divided audience vote at the end of the debate.

目前产前诊断的争议-会议辩论2024:所有接受胎儿治疗的胎儿都应该进行外显子组测序。
这份手稿总结了在国际产前诊断学会(ISPD) 2024年年会上举行的辩论。专家们讨论了是否所有接受胎儿治疗的胎儿都应该进行外显子组测序。赞成的论点包括,随着经验的增加和更好的临床可用性,外显子组测序可以产生比核型和微阵列更有价值的诊断和预后信息。这些额外的信息通常有助于向父母提供咨询,并提供对胎儿状况的更好了解,从而允许个性化医疗并支持以疾病为重点的胎儿治疗的进步。然而,相反,有人提出了对可得性和保健公平的重大关切。此外,由外显子组测序引起的潜在护理延误可能会对胎儿干预的结果产生负面影响。最后,由于从基因检测中收集的信息可能会也可能不会影响到终止妊娠以外的妊娠管理决策,许多家庭可能会选择不进行检测。两位辩论家的论点记录了当前外显子组测序和基因检测的争议。这也反映在辩论结束时观众投票的分歧上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信