Exploring the Factors Associated with Attrition in a Lifestyle Intervention Trial amongst Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Desiring Fertility - An Interview based Study.

IF 1.1 Q2 Medicine
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-29 DOI:10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_173_24
Mary Ann, Chinta Parimala, Parisuddharao Koduri, Aleyamma Thayparmbil Kunjummen, Mohan Shashikant Kamath
{"title":"Exploring the Factors Associated with Attrition in a Lifestyle Intervention Trial amongst Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Desiring Fertility - An Interview based Study.","authors":"Mary Ann, Chinta Parimala, Parisuddharao Koduri, Aleyamma Thayparmbil Kunjummen, Mohan Shashikant Kamath","doi":"10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_173_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies exploring the barriers to weight management have suggested psychological, social and logistical barriers were important reasons for high attrition and non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the possible reasons for high attrition and non-adherence to lifestyle interventions in a trial setting amongst women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) who wish to conceive.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>The study was conducted in a tertary level hospital and employed a qualitative study paradigm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was nested within a feasibility study that explored the possibility of conducting lifestyle interventional trials in women with PCOS who wish to conceive. Eligible participants who refused participation in the trial were interviewed under three major categories: refusal before randomisation, refusal after randomisation and non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Thematic analysis was used to analyse textual data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants considered PCOS as a 'fairly common' condition and did not perceive the need to address the impact of PCOS on their health. The second recurring theme was the perception of being overweight as 'healthy' and 'normal' and downplaying lifestyle changes to focus only on fertility treatment for achieving pregnancy. Finally, the decision to pursue weight loss or to discontinue it seems to be a shared decision making among family memebers which limits the ability of the clinicians and healthcare practitioners to effectively deliver appropriate advice on lifestyle interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current findings would help in planning and designing adequately powered randomised controlled trials to evaluate the impact of lifestyle intervention in women with PCOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"23-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_173_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies exploring the barriers to weight management have suggested psychological, social and logistical barriers were important reasons for high attrition and non-adherence.

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the possible reasons for high attrition and non-adherence to lifestyle interventions in a trial setting amongst women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) who wish to conceive.

Setting and design: The study was conducted in a tertary level hospital and employed a qualitative study paradigm.

Materials and methods: The study was nested within a feasibility study that explored the possibility of conducting lifestyle interventional trials in women with PCOS who wish to conceive. Eligible participants who refused participation in the trial were interviewed under three major categories: refusal before randomisation, refusal after randomisation and non-adherence.

Statistical analysis used: Thematic analysis was used to analyse textual data.

Results: The participants considered PCOS as a 'fairly common' condition and did not perceive the need to address the impact of PCOS on their health. The second recurring theme was the perception of being overweight as 'healthy' and 'normal' and downplaying lifestyle changes to focus only on fertility treatment for achieving pregnancy. Finally, the decision to pursue weight loss or to discontinue it seems to be a shared decision making among family memebers which limits the ability of the clinicians and healthcare practitioners to effectively deliver appropriate advice on lifestyle interventions.

Conclusion: The current findings would help in planning and designing adequately powered randomised controlled trials to evaluate the impact of lifestyle intervention in women with PCOS.

Abstract Image

在渴望生育的多囊卵巢综合征妇女的生活方式干预试验中探索与损耗相关的因素-一项基于访谈的研究。
背景:以往对体重管理障碍的研究表明,心理、社会和后勤障碍是造成高损耗率和不坚持的重要原因。目的:本研究的目的是评估希望怀孕的多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女在试验环境中高损耗和不坚持生活方式干预的可能原因。环境与设计:本研究在某三级医院进行,采用质性研究范式。材料和方法:本研究是一项可行性研究的一部分,该可行性研究探讨了对希望怀孕的多囊卵巢综合征妇女进行生活方式干预试验的可能性。拒绝参加试验的符合条件的参与者按照三个主要类别进行访谈:随机化前拒绝、随机化后拒绝和不遵守。采用统计分析:采用主题分析对文本数据进行分析。结果:参与者认为多囊卵巢综合征是一种“相当普遍”的疾病,并且没有意识到需要解决多囊卵巢综合征对其健康的影响。第二个反复出现的主题是认为超重是“健康的”和“正常的”,并淡化生活方式的改变,只关注生育治疗以实现怀孕。最后,追求减肥或停止减肥的决定似乎是家庭成员共同做出的决定,这限制了临床医生和保健从业人员有效地提供有关生活方式干预的适当建议的能力。结论:目前的研究结果将有助于规划和设计足够有力的随机对照试验,以评估生活方式干预对多囊卵巢综合征妇女的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences (JHRS) (ISSN:0974-1208) a Quarterly peer-reviewed international journal is being launched in January 2008 under the auspices of Indian Society of Assisted Reproduction. The journal will cover all aspects human reproduction including Andrology, Assisted conception, Endocrinology, Physiology and Pathology, Implantation, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Embryology as well as Ethical, Legal and Social issues. The journal will publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信