Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the palliative care phase in palliative care facilities.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hironori Ohinata, Masanori Mori, Maho Aoyama, Nao Ito, Tomoko Shigeno, Tomoya Iida, Yuko Matsumura, Hiroaki Tsukuura, Akemi Shirado Naito, Kengo Imai, Naosuke Yokomichi, Tatsuya Morita, Mitsunori Miyashita
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the palliative care phase in palliative care facilities.","authors":"Hironori Ohinata, Masanori Mori, Maho Aoyama, Nao Ito, Tomoko Shigeno, Tomoya Iida, Yuko Matsumura, Hiroaki Tsukuura, Akemi Shirado Naito, Kengo Imai, Naosuke Yokomichi, Tatsuya Morita, Mitsunori Miyashita","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care phase is a tool to assess five phases that reflect a patient's care needs: stable, unstable, deteriorating, terminal, and bereavement. The palliative care phase is routinely used to describe the clinical status of patients and their families. Australia has established nationwide benchmarks for comparing care services. However, the reliability of palliative care in Japan has not yet been verified. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the palliative care phase and examine its inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Based on previous studies, two healthcare providers evaluated the single-patient phase and calculated kappa coefficients. The reliability was assessed between March 2024 and November 2024 in a palliative care facility in Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 419 phase evaluations were conducted. The inter-rater reliability was a kappa of 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.40-0.54). Assessment disagreements were most common during the unstable and deteriorating phases (11.7%). There were no statistically significant differences in the matches or mismatches in the assessment of the adequacy of the phases (P = 0.338).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Japanese version of the palliative care phase was well-adapted for use in clinical palliative care. However, the concepts underlying these phases are not clearly distinguishable. In the future, we need to further educate healthcare providers and accumulate experience through on-the-job training to improve the quality of care through palliative care outcome measurements and benchmarking during the palliative care phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care phase is a tool to assess five phases that reflect a patient's care needs: stable, unstable, deteriorating, terminal, and bereavement. The palliative care phase is routinely used to describe the clinical status of patients and their families. Australia has established nationwide benchmarks for comparing care services. However, the reliability of palliative care in Japan has not yet been verified. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the palliative care phase and examine its inter-rater reliability.

Methods: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Based on previous studies, two healthcare providers evaluated the single-patient phase and calculated kappa coefficients. The reliability was assessed between March 2024 and November 2024 in a palliative care facility in Japan.

Results: A total of 419 phase evaluations were conducted. The inter-rater reliability was a kappa of 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.40-0.54). Assessment disagreements were most common during the unstable and deteriorating phases (11.7%). There were no statistically significant differences in the matches or mismatches in the assessment of the adequacy of the phases (P = 0.338).

Conclusion: The Japanese version of the palliative care phase was well-adapted for use in clinical palliative care. However, the concepts underlying these phases are not clearly distinguishable. In the future, we need to further educate healthcare providers and accumulate experience through on-the-job training to improve the quality of care through palliative care outcome measurements and benchmarking during the palliative care phase.

日本版姑息治疗阶段在姑息治疗机构的信度和效度。
背景:姑息治疗阶段是一种评估反映患者护理需求的五个阶段的工具:稳定、不稳定、恶化、末期和丧亲。姑息治疗阶段通常用于描述患者及其家属的临床状况。澳大利亚已经建立了全国范围内比较护理服务的基准。然而,日本姑息治疗的可靠性尚未得到证实。本研究旨在开发日本版的姑息治疗阶段,并检验其评估者之间的信度。方法:这是一项多中心、横断面研究。基于先前的研究,两位医疗保健提供者评估了单患者阶段并计算了kappa系数。可靠性评估于2024年3月至2024年11月在日本的一家姑息治疗机构进行。结果:共进行了419期评价。评级间信度kappa为0.47(95%置信区间0.40-0.54)。评估分歧在不稳定和恶化阶段最为常见(11.7%)。在评估阶段的充分性时,匹配或不匹配的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.338)。结论:日语版姑息治疗分期适用于临床姑息治疗。然而,这些阶段背后的概念并没有清晰的区分。在未来,我们需要进一步教育医疗服务提供者,并通过在职培训积累经验,通过姑息治疗阶段的结果测量和基准来提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信