Research Methodology in Acupuncture for Managing Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Miguel Ángel Infantes Rosales, Ángeles Mesías Pesqueira, Astrid Castellanos Díaz, Esther Díaz Mohedo
{"title":"Research Methodology in Acupuncture for Managing Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Miguel Ángel Infantes Rosales, Ángeles Mesías Pesqueira, Astrid Castellanos Díaz, Esther Díaz Mohedo","doi":"10.1002/nau.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acupuncture and moxibustion are being explored as complementary therapies with promising potential in managing interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). While some studies indicate possible benefits, their scientific basis and clinical efficacy remain subjects of debate, partly due to methodological flaws in study designs involving acupuncture and related modalities, which warrant further attention and discussion. The main objective is to analyze and evaluate the research methodologies used in existing literature on acupuncture for managing IC/BPS, providing insight into the methodological challenges and opportunities in this field.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Web of Sciences (WOS), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Epistemonikos, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched from their inception to August 2024. Data were extracted based on the study designs, primary outcome measures, adverse events (AEs), and participants' subjective views.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the experimental studies (27.3%, 6 of 22) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but only 2 full texts were accessible. Of the 4 RCTs, 3 involved rats. Observational research (50%) included case reports (27.3%), cohort studies (9.1%), and theoretical studies (4.5%). Additionally, reviews (22.7%) were included. The main languages were English (77.3%), Chinese (13.6%), Japanese (4.5%), and Russian (4.5%). The most frequently reported outcome was pain, followed by quality-of-life impact (symptom burden), urinary frequency and urgency, nocturia, and bladder capacity. AEs were reported in only 5 articles, all of which concluded that these effects were not significant and that acupuncture could be considered a safe and relatively noninvasive technique. One review found a risk of 1 AE/76 000 patients, with the most common side effects being minor, such as bleeding or bruising.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence on acupuncture for interstitial cystitis is limited in quality, with studies often compromised by biases, small sample sizes, and lack of standardized protocols. Acupuncture is frequently part of multimodal treatments, aligning with Traditional Chinese Medicine's holistic approach to balance physical, mental, and emotional health. More high-quality experimental research is needed, focusing on standardized protocols and participant experiences to better evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acupuncture and moxibustion are being explored as complementary therapies with promising potential in managing interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). While some studies indicate possible benefits, their scientific basis and clinical efficacy remain subjects of debate, partly due to methodological flaws in study designs involving acupuncture and related modalities, which warrant further attention and discussion. The main objective is to analyze and evaluate the research methodologies used in existing literature on acupuncture for managing IC/BPS, providing insight into the methodological challenges and opportunities in this field.

Materials and methods: National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Web of Sciences (WOS), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Epistemonikos, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched from their inception to August 2024. Data were extracted based on the study designs, primary outcome measures, adverse events (AEs), and participants' subjective views.

Results: All the experimental studies (27.3%, 6 of 22) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but only 2 full texts were accessible. Of the 4 RCTs, 3 involved rats. Observational research (50%) included case reports (27.3%), cohort studies (9.1%), and theoretical studies (4.5%). Additionally, reviews (22.7%) were included. The main languages were English (77.3%), Chinese (13.6%), Japanese (4.5%), and Russian (4.5%). The most frequently reported outcome was pain, followed by quality-of-life impact (symptom burden), urinary frequency and urgency, nocturia, and bladder capacity. AEs were reported in only 5 articles, all of which concluded that these effects were not significant and that acupuncture could be considered a safe and relatively noninvasive technique. One review found a risk of 1 AE/76 000 patients, with the most common side effects being minor, such as bleeding or bruising.

Conclusion: Current evidence on acupuncture for interstitial cystitis is limited in quality, with studies often compromised by biases, small sample sizes, and lack of standardized protocols. Acupuncture is frequently part of multimodal treatments, aligning with Traditional Chinese Medicine's holistic approach to balance physical, mental, and emotional health. More high-quality experimental research is needed, focusing on standardized protocols and participant experiences to better evaluate its efficacy and safety.

针灸治疗间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征的研究方法:范围综述。
背景:针灸作为治疗间质性膀胱炎/膀胱痛综合征(IC/BPS)的补充疗法正在被探索。虽然一些研究表明了可能的益处,但它们的科学基础和临床疗效仍然是争论的主题,部分原因是涉及针灸和相关模式的研究设计的方法学缺陷,这需要进一步关注和讨论。主要目的是分析和评估针灸治疗IC/BPS的现有文献中使用的研究方法,为该领域的方法学挑战和机遇提供见解。材料和方法:检索美国国家医学图书馆(PubMed)、联合和补充医学数据库(AMED)、Cochrane图书馆、医学摘录数据库(EMBASE)、Web of Sciences (WOS)、医学文献分析和在线检索系统(MEDLINE)、护理和联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Scopus、SPORTDiscus、Epistemonikos和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro),检索时间为建立之日至2024年8月。根据研究设计、主要结局指标、不良事件(ae)和参与者的主观观点提取数据。结果:所有实验研究(27.3%,6 / 22)均为随机对照试验(RCTs),但仅有2篇全文可查。在4项随机对照试验中,3项涉及大鼠。观察性研究(50%)包括病例报告(27.3%)、队列研究(9.1%)和理论研究(4.5%)。此外,还包括综述(22.7%)。主要语言为英语(77.3%)、汉语(13.6%)、日语(4.5%)、俄语(4.5%)。最常见的结果是疼痛,其次是生活质量影响(症状负担)、尿频和尿急、夜尿和膀胱容量。只有5篇文章报道了ae,所有这些文章的结论都是这些影响并不显著,针灸可以被认为是一种安全且相对无创的技术。一项综述发现,每76000例患者中有1例AE的风险,最常见的副作用是轻微的,如出血或瘀伤。结论:目前关于针灸治疗间质性膀胱炎的证据质量有限,研究经常受到偏倚、小样本量和缺乏标准化方案的影响。针灸通常是多模式治疗的一部分,与传统中医平衡身体、精神和情感健康的整体方法相一致。需要更多高质量的实验研究,重点关注标准化方案和参与者经验,以更好地评估其有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信