Clinical Benefit of Structured Reporting Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in MRI in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
IF 1.3 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Christian Nelles, Anton Wagner, Simon Lennartz, Robert Wawer Matos Reimer, Alexander Christian Bunck, Lenhard Pennig, Moritz Palmowski, Dirk Stippel, Dirk Thomas Waldschmidt, Dania Cioni, Emanuele Neri, David Maintz, Thorsten Persigehl
{"title":"Clinical Benefit of Structured Reporting Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in MRI in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Christian Nelles, Anton Wagner, Simon Lennartz, Robert Wawer Matos Reimer, Alexander Christian Bunck, Lenhard Pennig, Moritz Palmowski, Dirk Stippel, Dirk Thomas Waldschmidt, Dania Cioni, Emanuele Neri, David Maintz, Thorsten Persigehl","doi":"10.1055/a-2553-1392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of structured reporting of MRI examinations in patients at risk for HCC using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) created during the daily clinical routine.In this retrospective study, MRI examinations of 163 patients under HCC surveillance and HCC follow-up were analyzed. The study cohort included a group of 76 patients whose examinations were performed using free-text reporting and a group of 87 patients with structured template reporting based on the LI-RADS criteria. The diagnostic accuracy of the specified LI-RADS category was analyzed for both groups. The impact of structured reporting and the frequency of reporting of the major and ancillary LI-RADS features in free-text reports and structured reports were compared using the χ²-test.Liver lesions were classified according to LI-RADS significantly more often in the structured reports (91.4%) than in the unstructured free-text reports (82.6%) (p < 0.01). Most relevant major LI-RADS criteria were described significantly more frequently when using the structured report template compared to free text, e.g., arterial hyperenhancement 100% vs. 92.5% (p < 0.01) and washout 93.4% vs. 79.7% (p < 0.01). Only the documentation of threshold growth was not significantly improved, but absolute lesion size was reported significantly more often within the structured reports. The diagnostic accuracy of the LI-RADS category was higher for the structured reports than for the free-text reports (82.3% vs. 63.9%).Structured reporting improves LI-RADS documentation in MRI reports of patients at risk for HCC and may help with multidisciplinary communication and patient management. · Structured reporting showed improved documentation of key features for LI-RADS classification compared to nonstructured MRI reports.. · Structured reports improve the categorization of liver lesions according to LI-RADS in patients at risk for HCC.. · Nelles C, Wagner A, Lennartz S et al. Clinical Benefit of Structured Reporting Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in MRI in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2553-1392.</p>","PeriodicalId":21490,"journal":{"name":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2553-1392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of structured reporting of MRI examinations in patients at risk for HCC using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) created during the daily clinical routine.In this retrospective study, MRI examinations of 163 patients under HCC surveillance and HCC follow-up were analyzed. The study cohort included a group of 76 patients whose examinations were performed using free-text reporting and a group of 87 patients with structured template reporting based on the LI-RADS criteria. The diagnostic accuracy of the specified LI-RADS category was analyzed for both groups. The impact of structured reporting and the frequency of reporting of the major and ancillary LI-RADS features in free-text reports and structured reports were compared using the χ²-test.Liver lesions were classified according to LI-RADS significantly more often in the structured reports (91.4%) than in the unstructured free-text reports (82.6%) (p < 0.01). Most relevant major LI-RADS criteria were described significantly more frequently when using the structured report template compared to free text, e.g., arterial hyperenhancement 100% vs. 92.5% (p < 0.01) and washout 93.4% vs. 79.7% (p < 0.01). Only the documentation of threshold growth was not significantly improved, but absolute lesion size was reported significantly more often within the structured reports. The diagnostic accuracy of the LI-RADS category was higher for the structured reports than for the free-text reports (82.3% vs. 63.9%).Structured reporting improves LI-RADS documentation in MRI reports of patients at risk for HCC and may help with multidisciplinary communication and patient management. · Structured reporting showed improved documentation of key features for LI-RADS classification compared to nonstructured MRI reports.. · Structured reports improve the categorization of liver lesions according to LI-RADS in patients at risk for HCC.. · Nelles C, Wagner A, Lennartz S et al. Clinical Benefit of Structured Reporting Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in MRI in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2553-1392.
期刊介绍:
Die RöFo veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsartikel und Fallberichte aus dem Bereich der Radiologie und den weiteren bildgebenden Verfahren in der Medizin. Es dürfen nur Arbeiten eingereicht werden, die noch nicht veröffentlicht sind und die auch nicht gleichzeitig einer anderen Zeitschrift zur Veröffentlichung angeboten wurden. Alle eingereichten Beiträge unterliegen einer sorgfältigen fachlichen Begutachtung.
Gegründet 1896 – nur knapp 1 Jahr nach der Entdeckung der Röntgenstrahlen durch C.W. Röntgen – blickt die RöFo auf über 100 Jahre Erfahrung als wichtigstes Publikationsmedium in der deutschsprachigen Radiologie zurück. Sie ist damit die älteste radiologische Fachzeitschrift und schafft es erfolgreich, lange Kontinuität mit dem Anspruch an wissenschaftliches Publizieren auf internationalem Niveau zu verbinden. Durch ihren zentralen Platz im Verlagsprogramm stellte die RöFo die Basis für das heute umfassende und erfolgreiche Radiologie-Medienangebot im Georg Thieme Verlag.
Besonders eng verbunden ist die RöFo mit der Geschichte der Röntgengesellschaften in Deutschland und Österreich. Sie ist offizielles Organ von DRG und ÖRG und die Mitglieder der Fachgesellschaften erhalten die Zeitschrift im Rahmen ihrer Mitgliedschaft. Mit ihrem wissenschaftlichen Kernteil und dem eigenen Mitteilungsteil der Fachgesellschaften bietet die RöFo Monat für Monat ein Forum für den Austausch von Inhalten und Botschaften der radiologischen Community im deutschsprachigen Raum.