{"title":"Pharmacokinetic study of two sulfamethoxazole-phytochemical antimicrobial conjugates in mice.","authors":"J Yang, B Ling, S B Chidambaram, M K Sakharkar","doi":"10.1691/ph.2025.5510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged to be a big threat to both human and animal health. Along the tighter control on antibiotic use, developing novel therapeutic agents and approaches is crucial for combating AMR. We recently designed and synthesized several antibiotic-phytochemical conjugates which exhibited potent antimicrobial activities. To understand their pharmacological behavior and obtain a guideline for further drug development, we undertook a pharmacokinetic study on sulfamethoxazole-gallate and sulfamethoxazole-caffeate. C<sub>max</sub> was determined to be 842 ± 544 ng/mL at dose of 1500 mg/kg and 733 ± 477 ng/mL at dose of 2000 mg/kg for sulfamethoxazole-gallate and 211 ± 100 at a dose of 150 mg/kg and 755 ± 705 ng/mL at dose of 300 mg/kg for sulfamethoxazole-caffeate. T<sub>max</sub> was 1 h for sulfamethoxazole-gallate under both doses and 0.5 h for sulfamethoxazole-caffeate under both doses. Since C<sub>max</sub> was significantly lower than the <i>in vitro</i> MIC for both conjugates, more formulations and administration routes such as IV injection will be investigated in our future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20145,"journal":{"name":"Pharmazie","volume":"80 1","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmazie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2025.5510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged to be a big threat to both human and animal health. Along the tighter control on antibiotic use, developing novel therapeutic agents and approaches is crucial for combating AMR. We recently designed and synthesized several antibiotic-phytochemical conjugates which exhibited potent antimicrobial activities. To understand their pharmacological behavior and obtain a guideline for further drug development, we undertook a pharmacokinetic study on sulfamethoxazole-gallate and sulfamethoxazole-caffeate. Cmax was determined to be 842 ± 544 ng/mL at dose of 1500 mg/kg and 733 ± 477 ng/mL at dose of 2000 mg/kg for sulfamethoxazole-gallate and 211 ± 100 at a dose of 150 mg/kg and 755 ± 705 ng/mL at dose of 300 mg/kg for sulfamethoxazole-caffeate. Tmax was 1 h for sulfamethoxazole-gallate under both doses and 0.5 h for sulfamethoxazole-caffeate under both doses. Since Cmax was significantly lower than the in vitro MIC for both conjugates, more formulations and administration routes such as IV injection will be investigated in our future studies.
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)已成为对人类和动物健康的重大威胁。在严格控制抗生素使用的同时,开发新的治疗药物和方法对于抗击抗生素耐药性至关重要。我们最近设计并合成了几种具有有效抗菌活性的抗生素-植物化学偶联物。为了了解它们的药理行为并为进一步的药物开发提供指导,我们进行了磺胺甲恶唑-没食子酸酯和磺胺甲恶唑-咖啡酸酯的药代动力学研究。Cmax决心是842±544 ng / mL的剂量1500毫克/公斤和733±477 ng / mL的剂量2000毫克/公斤sulfamethoxazole-gallate和211±100剂量150毫克/公斤和755±705 ng / mL sulfamethoxazole-caffeate剂量300毫克/公斤。未食子酸磺胺甲恶唑在两种剂量下的Tmax均为1 h,咖啡酸磺胺甲恶唑在两种剂量下的Tmax均为0.5 h。由于两种缀合物的Cmax均明显低于体外MIC,因此我们将在未来的研究中探索更多的配方和给药途径,如静脉注射。
期刊介绍:
The journal DiePharmazie publishs reviews, experimental studies, letters to the editor, as well as book reviews.
The following fields of pharmacy are covered:
Pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry;
Pharmaceutical analysis and drug control;
Pharmaceutical technolgy;
Biopharmacy (biopharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, biotransformation);
Experimental and clinical pharmacology;
Pharmaceutical biology (pharmacognosy);
Clinical pharmacy;
History of pharmacy.