A Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Support the Construct Validity of the Direct Care Staff Survey Scale: A Measure of Work Environment and Work Effectiveness in Long-Term Care.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Amil Kusain Tan, William Ellery Samuels
{"title":"A Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Support the Construct Validity of the Direct Care Staff Survey Scale: A Measure of Work Environment and Work Effectiveness in Long-Term Care.","authors":"Amil Kusain Tan, William Ellery Samuels","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Efforts are limited in investigating psychometric properties of the Direct Care Staff Survey (DCSS) that measures the nurse practice environment in long-term care. <b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to determine if the DCSS is consistent with its underlying five-factor model (Impact of Work Environment on Organizational Performance) and evaluate its validity in a long-term care nurse sample. <b>Methods:</b> A national United States sample of long-term care nurses completed the DCSS. SPSS Amos was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). <b>Results:</b> CFA found modest support for a five-factor structure for the Impact of Work Environment on Organizational Performance model, whereas χ<sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> exceeded the commonly accepted criteria (χ<sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 2.47, <3), fit indices that accounted for model complexity did not (comparative fit index = 0.70, not >0.8; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.67, not ≥ 0.95; root-mean-square error of approximation = .08, not <.08). Further analyses indicated that some items may benefit from revision. <b>Conclusion:</b> The CFA provided modest support for the currently accepted five-factor structure of the DCSS. This study suggests that there is still a need to revise the DCSS questionnaire to address the directionality of the relationship between the factors. This revision could facilitate the use of the DCSS to understand and guide improvements in long-term care nurses' work environments and is vital for enhancing staff well-being and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Efforts are limited in investigating psychometric properties of the Direct Care Staff Survey (DCSS) that measures the nurse practice environment in long-term care. Purpose: This study aimed to determine if the DCSS is consistent with its underlying five-factor model (Impact of Work Environment on Organizational Performance) and evaluate its validity in a long-term care nurse sample. Methods: A national United States sample of long-term care nurses completed the DCSS. SPSS Amos was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: CFA found modest support for a five-factor structure for the Impact of Work Environment on Organizational Performance model, whereas χ2/df exceeded the commonly accepted criteria (χ2/df = 2.47, <3), fit indices that accounted for model complexity did not (comparative fit index = 0.70, not >0.8; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.67, not ≥ 0.95; root-mean-square error of approximation = .08, not <.08). Further analyses indicated that some items may benefit from revision. Conclusion: The CFA provided modest support for the currently accepted five-factor structure of the DCSS. This study suggests that there is still a need to revise the DCSS questionnaire to address the directionality of the relationship between the factors. This revision could facilitate the use of the DCSS to understand and guide improvements in long-term care nurses' work environments and is vital for enhancing staff well-being and patient outcomes.

支持直接照护人员调查量表建构效度的验证性因子分析:长期照护工作环境与工作效能的测量。
背景:研究直接护理人员调查(DCSS)的心理测量特性的努力是有限的,该调查测量了长期护理中的护士实践环境。目的:本研究旨在确定工作环境对组织绩效的影响是否与其基础五因素模型(工作环境对组织绩效的影响)相一致,并评估其在长期护理护士样本中的有效性。方法:对美国长期护理护士进行问卷调查。采用SPSS Amos进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。结果:CFA发现工作环境对组织绩效影响模型的五因素结构有一定程度的支持,而χ2/df超过了普遍接受的标准(χ2/df = 2.47, 0.8;Tucker-Lewis指数= 0.67,不≥0.95;结论:CFA对目前公认的DCSS的五因素结构提供了适度的支持。本研究提示,仍有必要对问卷进行修订,以解决各因素之间关系的方向性。这一修订有助于使用DCSS来理解和指导长期护理护士工作环境的改进,对于提高工作人员的福祉和患者的治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信