Andrea Campo, Franco Goia, Roberto Cottino, Carmen Gandolfo, Giusto Viglino
{"title":"Reduced intensity incremental hemodialysis start does not decrease life expectancy and saves money: results of the RIDDLE study.","authors":"Andrea Campo, Franco Goia, Roberto Cottino, Carmen Gandolfo, Giusto Viglino","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02271-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2001, twice-weekly hemodialysis has been the standard method for starting hemodialysis at the Alba Hospital (Piedmont, Italy).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Incident patients who started in-center hemodialysis from January 2001 to December 2016, had sufficient residual kidney function (urine output > 500 ml/day), and survived on hemodialysis > 1 year were selected and followed until death or censoring on December 31, 2019. The endpoints for the whole cohort are survival, duration of twice-weekly hemodialysis, preservation of residual kidney function, and cost savings. Analysis was performed on subgroups with long-term (L: > = 365 days) or short-term (S: < 365 days) twice-weekly hemodialysis duration, matched for age, sex, year of hemodialysis start, type of vascular access and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 146 patients with a total follow-up of 251,328 patient-days, of which 80,635 on twice-weekly hemodialysis. The median survival was 1793 days, median twice-weekly hemodialysis duration was 417 days, and median residual kidney function duration was 820 days. In the matched comparison, the long-term duration twice-weekly hemodialysis group had lower admissions (18.2 vs 27.7/1000 patient-days) and unscheduled hemodialysis session rates (0.26 vs 0.75/1000 patient-days) and greater median residual kidney function duration (1353 vs 445 days), but similar median survival (1809 vs 1744 days). During twice-weekly hemodialysis, 12,291 hemodialysis sessions were spared, resulting in a cost saving of 1,986,226 Euros, based on current local reimbursement fees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twice-weekly hemodialysis, under strict clinical surveillance appears to be a safe, feasible, and cost-saving method for initiating hemodialysis in patients with residual kidney function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02271-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Since 2001, twice-weekly hemodialysis has been the standard method for starting hemodialysis at the Alba Hospital (Piedmont, Italy).
Methods: Incident patients who started in-center hemodialysis from January 2001 to December 2016, had sufficient residual kidney function (urine output > 500 ml/day), and survived on hemodialysis > 1 year were selected and followed until death or censoring on December 31, 2019. The endpoints for the whole cohort are survival, duration of twice-weekly hemodialysis, preservation of residual kidney function, and cost savings. Analysis was performed on subgroups with long-term (L: > = 365 days) or short-term (S: < 365 days) twice-weekly hemodialysis duration, matched for age, sex, year of hemodialysis start, type of vascular access and diabetes.
Results: The study included 146 patients with a total follow-up of 251,328 patient-days, of which 80,635 on twice-weekly hemodialysis. The median survival was 1793 days, median twice-weekly hemodialysis duration was 417 days, and median residual kidney function duration was 820 days. In the matched comparison, the long-term duration twice-weekly hemodialysis group had lower admissions (18.2 vs 27.7/1000 patient-days) and unscheduled hemodialysis session rates (0.26 vs 0.75/1000 patient-days) and greater median residual kidney function duration (1353 vs 445 days), but similar median survival (1809 vs 1744 days). During twice-weekly hemodialysis, 12,291 hemodialysis sessions were spared, resulting in a cost saving of 1,986,226 Euros, based on current local reimbursement fees.
Conclusions: Twice-weekly hemodialysis, under strict clinical surveillance appears to be a safe, feasible, and cost-saving method for initiating hemodialysis in patients with residual kidney function.
背景:自2001年以来,每周两次血液透析一直是Alba医院(Piedmont, Italy)开始血液透析的标准方法。方法:选择2001年1月至2016年12月开始中心血液透析,剩余肾功能充足(尿量> 500 ml/d),血液透析生存> 1年的事件患者,随访至2019年12月31日死亡或审查。整个队列的终点是生存、每周两次血液透析的持续时间、剩余肾功能的保存和成本节约。对长期(L: > = 365天)和短期(S:结果:研究纳入146例患者,总随访时间为251,328患者-天,其中80,635例患者每周进行两次血液透析。中位生存期为1793天,中位每周两次血液透析持续时间为417天,中位剩余肾功能持续时间为820天。在匹配比较中,长期每周两次血液透析组的入院率较低(18.2 vs 27.7/1000患者-天),非计划血液透析期率(0.26 vs 0.75/1000患者-天),中位剩余肾功能持续时间(1353 vs 445天)较大,但中位生存期相似(1809 vs 1744天)。在每周两次的血液透析期间,免去了12 291次血液透析,按目前的当地偿还费用计算,节省了1 986 226欧元。结论:在严格的临床监测下,每周进行两次血液透析是一种安全、可行且节省成本的方法,可用于残肾功能患者的血液透析。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).