Development and preliminary validation of a standardized measure of neuropsychological assessment readiness.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael D Barnett, Allyson M Coldiron, Derek C Killingsworth
{"title":"Development and preliminary validation of a standardized measure of neuropsychological assessment readiness.","authors":"Michael D Barnett, Allyson M Coldiron, Derek C Killingsworth","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2485207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropsychological evaluations are typically conducted under specific preconditions as it has been long established that many factors unrelated to an individual's true neurocognitive functioning can influence their cognitive test performance. Assessment readiness refers to the extent to which a client is in a state appropriate for undergoing a neuropsychological evaluation (e.g., well rested, sober) as well as any atypical characteristics that require specific accommodations from the administering clinician (e.g., mobility limitations, colorblindness). The purpose of this study was to propose and investigate the preliminary validation of a screening measure of assessment readiness in order to introduce a systematic method for assessing this novel construct. Younger and older adults (<i>N</i> = 93) were administered the Barnett-Coldiron Assessment Readiness Inventory (BCARI) prior to completing a short battery of neuropsychological tests. Additionally, subject matter experts (SMEs) were asked to rate the content validity of this inventory. The BCARI showed preliminary evidence of discriminant validity when compared to other neuropsychological tests and produced the expected minimal variance in assessment readiness scores among healthy, assessment-ready participant samples and across multiple demographic variables. SMEs were largely in support of the BCARI as a valid scale for measuring assessment readiness and positively rated its application in both clinical and research settings. The BCARI shows potential as a useful tool in evaluating the profile validity of clients prior to neuropsychological testing and for reporting a standardized measure of assessment readiness within the profile validity of evaluation reports and research articles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"140-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2485207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuropsychological evaluations are typically conducted under specific preconditions as it has been long established that many factors unrelated to an individual's true neurocognitive functioning can influence their cognitive test performance. Assessment readiness refers to the extent to which a client is in a state appropriate for undergoing a neuropsychological evaluation (e.g., well rested, sober) as well as any atypical characteristics that require specific accommodations from the administering clinician (e.g., mobility limitations, colorblindness). The purpose of this study was to propose and investigate the preliminary validation of a screening measure of assessment readiness in order to introduce a systematic method for assessing this novel construct. Younger and older adults (N = 93) were administered the Barnett-Coldiron Assessment Readiness Inventory (BCARI) prior to completing a short battery of neuropsychological tests. Additionally, subject matter experts (SMEs) were asked to rate the content validity of this inventory. The BCARI showed preliminary evidence of discriminant validity when compared to other neuropsychological tests and produced the expected minimal variance in assessment readiness scores among healthy, assessment-ready participant samples and across multiple demographic variables. SMEs were largely in support of the BCARI as a valid scale for measuring assessment readiness and positively rated its application in both clinical and research settings. The BCARI shows potential as a useful tool in evaluating the profile validity of clients prior to neuropsychological testing and for reporting a standardized measure of assessment readiness within the profile validity of evaluation reports and research articles.

神经心理评估准备的标准化测量方法的开发和初步验证。
神经心理学评估通常是在特定的前提条件下进行的,因为长期以来已经确定,许多与个人真实神经认知功能无关的因素会影响他们的认知测试表现。评估准备是指病人处于适合接受神经心理学评估的状态的程度(例如,休息良好,清醒)以及任何需要临床医生进行特定调整的非典型特征(例如,行动能力限制,色盲)。本研究的目的是提出并调查评估准备程度的筛选措施的初步验证,以便引入评估这种新结构的系统方法。年轻人和老年人(N = 93)在完成简短的神经心理测试之前进行了Barnett-Coldiron评估准备量表(BCARI)。此外,主题专家(sme)被要求评价该清单的内容效度。与其他神经心理学测试相比,BCARI显示了判别效度的初步证据,并在健康、准备评估的参与者样本和多个人口统计学变量之间产生了预期的最小方差。中小企业大多支持BCARI作为衡量评估准备程度的有效量表,并积极评价其在临床和研究环境中的应用。BCARI显示了作为一种有用的工具在神经心理测试之前评估来访者的轮廓效度,以及在评估报告和研究文章的轮廓效度中报告评估准备程度的标准化测量的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信