Comparing Clinical Preparedness of Newly Qualified Diagnostic Radiographers Trained With Immersive Virtual Reality vs. Traditional Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.
IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Comparing Clinical Preparedness of Newly Qualified Diagnostic Radiographers Trained With Immersive Virtual Reality vs. Traditional Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Hossein Karimi, Samantha Clarke, Emily Watson","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preparing diagnostic radiographers for clinical roles is vital to ensure readiness for real-world scenarios. Traditional simulation methods have been central to radiography education, but virtual reality (VR) technology introduces immersive and dynamic environments that may enhance clinical preparedness. This study compares the perceptions of clinical preparedness among newly qualified radiographers trained with VR by Virtual Medical Coaching and traditional simulation methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods comparative study was conducted with 80 newly qualified radiographers from two universities. Forty were trained using VR, and forty with traditional methods. Participation in the assigned simulation methods was mandatory, but students could opt out of having their responses recorded. All invited students consented to inclusion in the study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus groups and objective performance measures, including input from heads of departments. Thematic analysis identified key themes in qualitative data, while quantitative data were analysed using mixed-effects models, two-way ANOVA and t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mixed-effects model showed that VR-trained students had significantly higher clinical preparedness scores (β = 0.905, SE = 0.106, z = 8.513, p < 0.001). T-tests revealed that VR-trained students scored higher in confidence, adaptability, technical proficiency and problem-solving skills (p < 0.0001). VR-trained radiographers also outperformed their traditionally trained counterparts in supervisor evaluations, radiograph quality and emergency performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR training enhances confidence, adaptability and technical proficiency in newly qualified radiographers. Its immersive nature, combined with immediate feedback, contributes to improved clinical preparedness. This study highlights the potential benefits of incorporating VR into radiography education.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Preparing diagnostic radiographers for clinical roles is vital to ensure readiness for real-world scenarios. Traditional simulation methods have been central to radiography education, but virtual reality (VR) technology introduces immersive and dynamic environments that may enhance clinical preparedness. This study compares the perceptions of clinical preparedness among newly qualified radiographers trained with VR by Virtual Medical Coaching and traditional simulation methods.
Methods: A mixed-methods comparative study was conducted with 80 newly qualified radiographers from two universities. Forty were trained using VR, and forty with traditional methods. Participation in the assigned simulation methods was mandatory, but students could opt out of having their responses recorded. All invited students consented to inclusion in the study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus groups and objective performance measures, including input from heads of departments. Thematic analysis identified key themes in qualitative data, while quantitative data were analysed using mixed-effects models, two-way ANOVA and t-tests.
Results: The mixed-effects model showed that VR-trained students had significantly higher clinical preparedness scores (β = 0.905, SE = 0.106, z = 8.513, p < 0.001). T-tests revealed that VR-trained students scored higher in confidence, adaptability, technical proficiency and problem-solving skills (p < 0.0001). VR-trained radiographers also outperformed their traditionally trained counterparts in supervisor evaluations, radiograph quality and emergency performance.
Conclusion: VR training enhances confidence, adaptability and technical proficiency in newly qualified radiographers. Its immersive nature, combined with immediate feedback, contributes to improved clinical preparedness. This study highlights the potential benefits of incorporating VR into radiography education.
简介:准备诊断放射技师的临床角色是至关重要的,以确保准备为现实世界的情况。传统的模拟方法一直是放射学教育的核心,但虚拟现实(VR)技术引入了沉浸式和动态的环境,可以增强临床准备。本研究比较了通过虚拟医学指导和传统模拟方法接受VR培训的新合格放射技师对临床准备的看法。方法:采用混合方法对两所大学80名新入职放射技师进行对比研究。其中40人接受VR训练,40人接受传统方法训练。参与指定的模拟方法是强制性的,但学生可以选择不记录他们的回答。所有被邀请的学生都同意参与这项研究。通过半结构化访谈、焦点小组和客观绩效衡量(包括部门主管的意见)收集数据。主题分析确定了定性数据中的关键主题,而定量数据则使用混合效应模型、双向方差分析和t检验进行分析。结果:混合效应模型显示,虚拟现实培训学生临床准备得分显著提高(β = 0.905, SE = 0.106, z = 8.513, p)。结论:虚拟现实培训增强了新合格放射技师的自信心、适应性和技术熟练程度。其身临其境的性质,结合即时反馈,有助于改善临床准备。这项研究强调了将虚拟现实技术纳入放射学教育的潜在好处。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).