How inclusive were strategies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 for people with disabilities? Evidence from qualitative research in eight low- and middle-income countries.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xanthe Hunt, Sarah Marks, Shaffa Hameed, Donruedee Srisuppaphon, Francisco Diez-Canseco, Wachara Riewpaiboon, Shaheda Viriyathorn, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Divya Goyal, Tracey Smythe, Rifat Shahpar Khan, Luong Anh Ngoc, John Ganle, Shailaja Tetali, Lopita Huq, Tom Shakespeare, Zeynep Ilkkursun, Ceren Acarturk, Vu Quynh Mai, Lena Morgon Banks
{"title":"How inclusive were strategies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 for people with disabilities? Evidence from qualitative research in eight low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Xanthe Hunt, Sarah Marks, Shaffa Hameed, Donruedee Srisuppaphon, Francisco Diez-Canseco, Wachara Riewpaiboon, Shaheda Viriyathorn, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Divya Goyal, Tracey Smythe, Rifat Shahpar Khan, Luong Anh Ngoc, John Ganle, Shailaja Tetali, Lopita Huq, Tom Shakespeare, Zeynep Ilkkursun, Ceren Acarturk, Vu Quynh Mai, Lena Morgon Banks","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02482-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>From the outset of the pandemic there were calls to ensure people with disabilities were included in prevention and response measures, given their increased risk of health consequences from COVID-19 infection. This study sought to explore people with disabilities' experiences of inclusion in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, to understand how such responses can be more inclusive in the future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews were conducted with 372 people with disabilities and their caregivers in Bangladesh, Ghana, India, Peru, Thailand, Türkiye (with Syrian refugees), Viet Nam, and Zimbabwe between 1 December 2020 and 28 February 2023, and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that people with disabilities demonstrated high levels of knowledge about COVID-19 and were willing to adhere to prevention measures. However, participants noted that countries' COVID-19 responses were largely not inclusive of people with disabilities; that pandemic information was seldom available in accessible formats; and that adhering to social distancing and other mandates was challenging and incurred personal and economic costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consequently, the pandemic compounded existing barriers and inaccessibility experienced by people with disabilities and contributed to inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02482-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: From the outset of the pandemic there were calls to ensure people with disabilities were included in prevention and response measures, given their increased risk of health consequences from COVID-19 infection. This study sought to explore people with disabilities' experiences of inclusion in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, to understand how such responses can be more inclusive in the future.

Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 372 people with disabilities and their caregivers in Bangladesh, Ghana, India, Peru, Thailand, Türkiye (with Syrian refugees), Viet Nam, and Zimbabwe between 1 December 2020 and 28 February 2023, and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: The study found that people with disabilities demonstrated high levels of knowledge about COVID-19 and were willing to adhere to prevention measures. However, participants noted that countries' COVID-19 responses were largely not inclusive of people with disabilities; that pandemic information was seldom available in accessible formats; and that adhering to social distancing and other mandates was challenging and incurred personal and economic costs.

Conclusions: Consequently, the pandemic compounded existing barriers and inaccessibility experienced by people with disabilities and contributed to inequality.

预防COVID-19传播的战略对残疾人的包容性有多大?来自八个低收入和中等收入国家的定性研究证据。
背景:从大流行开始,就有人呼吁确保将残疾人纳入预防和应对措施,因为他们感染COVID-19造成的健康后果风险增加。本研究旨在探讨残疾人在应对2019冠状病毒病大流行中的包容经历,以了解这种应对措施如何在未来更具包容性。方法:在2020年12月1日至2023年2月28日期间,对孟加拉国、加纳、印度、秘鲁、泰国、缅甸(收容叙利亚难民)、越南和津巴布韦的372名残疾人及其护理人员进行了定性访谈,并采用主题分析法进行了分析。结果:研究发现,残疾人对COVID-19的知识水平较高,并愿意坚持采取预防措施。然而,与会者指出,各国的COVID-19应对措施在很大程度上没有包括残疾人;很少以无障碍格式提供大流行病信息;坚持保持社交距离和其他要求是具有挑战性的,并产生了个人和经济成本。结论:因此,这一流行病加剧了残疾人面临的现有障碍和无法进入的情况,并助长了不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信