Evaluating photosynthetic models and their potency in assessing plant responses to changing oxygen concentrations: a comparative analysis of An-Ca and An-Ci curves in Lolium perenne and Triticum aestivum.
Zi-Piao Ye, Xiao-Long Yang, Zi-Wu-Yin Ye, Ting An, Shi-Hua Duan, Hua-Jing Kang, Fu-Biao Wang
{"title":"Evaluating photosynthetic models and their potency in assessing plant responses to changing oxygen concentrations: a comparative analysis of <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub>-<i>C</i> <sub>a</sub> and <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub>-<i>C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves in <i>Lolium perenne</i> and <i>Triticum aestivum</i>.","authors":"Zi-Piao Ye, Xiao-Long Yang, Zi-Wu-Yin Ye, Ting An, Shi-Hua Duan, Hua-Jing Kang, Fu-Biao Wang","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2025.1575217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate determination of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding how plants respond to environmental changes. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry (FvCB) model and introduced a novel model to fit photosynthetic rates against ambient CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub>) and intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub>) curves for <i>Lolium perenne</i> and <i>Triticum aestivum</i> under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions. We observed significant discrepancies in the FvCB model's fitting capacity for <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> and <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves across different oxygen regimes, particularly in estimates of key parameters such as the maximum carboxylation rate (<i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub>), the day respiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>day</sub>), and the maximum electron transport rate for carbon assimilation (<i>J</i> <sub>A-max</sub>). Notably, under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions, the values of <i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub> and <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub> derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves using the FvCB model were 46.98%, 44.37%, 46.63%, and 37.66% lower than those from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves for <i>L. perenne</i>, and 47.10%, 44.30%, 47.03%, and 37.36% lower for <i>T. aestivum</i>, respectively. These results highlight that the FvCB model yields significantly different <i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub> and <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub> values when fitting <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> versus <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves for these two C<sub>3</sub> plants. In contrast, the novel model demonstrated superior fitting capabilities for both <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> and <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions, achieving high determination coefficients (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>≥ 0.989). Key parameters such as the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>A</i> <sub>max</sub>) and the CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point (<i>Γ</i>) in the presence of <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub>, showed no significant differences across oxygen concentrations. However, the apparent photorespiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>pa0</sub>) and photorespiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>p0</sub>) derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves consistently exceeded those from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves for both plant species. Furthermore, <i>R</i> <sub>pa0</sub> values derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves closely matched observed values, suggesting that <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves more accurately reflect the physiological state of plants, particularly for estimating photorespiratory rates. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate CO<sub>2</sub>-response curves to investigate plant photosynthesis and photorespiration under diverse environmental conditions, thereby ensuring a more accurate understanding of plant responses to changing environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12632,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Plant Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"1575217"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1575217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate determination of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding how plants respond to environmental changes. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry (FvCB) model and introduced a novel model to fit photosynthetic rates against ambient CO2 concentration (An-Ca) and intercellular CO2 concentration (An-Ci) curves for Lolium perenne and Triticum aestivum under 2% and 21% O2 conditions. We observed significant discrepancies in the FvCB model's fitting capacity for An-Ca and An-Ca curves across different oxygen regimes, particularly in estimates of key parameters such as the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax), the day respiratory rate (Rday), and the maximum electron transport rate for carbon assimilation (JA-max). Notably, under 2% and 21% O2 conditions, the values of Vcmax and Rday derived from An-Ca curves using the FvCB model were 46.98%, 44.37%, 46.63%, and 37.66% lower than those from An-Ci curves for L. perenne, and 47.10%, 44.30%, 47.03%, and 37.36% lower for T. aestivum, respectively. These results highlight that the FvCB model yields significantly different Vcmax and Rday values when fitting An-Ca versus An-Ci curves for these two C3 plants. In contrast, the novel model demonstrated superior fitting capabilities for both An-Ca and An-Ci curves under 2% and 21% O2 conditions, achieving high determination coefficients (R2≥ 0.989). Key parameters such as the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Amax) and the CO2 compensation point (Γ) in the presence of Rday, showed no significant differences across oxygen concentrations. However, the apparent photorespiratory rate (Rpa0) and photorespiratory rate (Rp0) derived from An-Ci curves consistently exceeded those from An-Ca curves for both plant species. Furthermore, Rpa0 values derived from An-Ca curves closely matched observed values, suggesting that An-Ca curves more accurately reflect the physiological state of plants, particularly for estimating photorespiratory rates. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate CO2-response curves to investigate plant photosynthesis and photorespiration under diverse environmental conditions, thereby ensuring a more accurate understanding of plant responses to changing environments.
期刊介绍:
In an ever changing world, plant science is of the utmost importance for securing the future well-being of humankind. Plants provide oxygen, food, feed, fibers, and building materials. In addition, they are a diverse source of industrial and pharmaceutical chemicals. Plants are centrally important to the health of ecosystems, and their understanding is critical for learning how to manage and maintain a sustainable biosphere. Plant science is extremely interdisciplinary, reaching from agricultural science to paleobotany, and molecular physiology to ecology. It uses the latest developments in computer science, optics, molecular biology and genomics to address challenges in model systems, agricultural crops, and ecosystems. Plant science research inquires into the form, function, development, diversity, reproduction, evolution and uses of both higher and lower plants and their interactions with other organisms throughout the biosphere. Frontiers in Plant Science welcomes outstanding contributions in any field of plant science from basic to applied research, from organismal to molecular studies, from single plant analysis to studies of populations and whole ecosystems, and from molecular to biophysical to computational approaches.
Frontiers in Plant Science publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Plant Science. The mission of Frontiers in Plant Science is to bring all relevant Plant Science areas together on a single platform.