The multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework "MARIE" for new clinical status.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2492478
Akina Takami, Naotaka Sakashita, Tatsuhiro Uenishi, Ayako Shoji, Ataru Igarashi
{"title":"The multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework \"MARIE\" for new clinical status.","authors":"Akina Takami, Naotaka Sakashita, Tatsuhiro Uenishi, Ayako Shoji, Ataru Igarashi","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2492478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjustment of drug prices after the change of their clinical status in the current drug pricing system in Japan functions as an appropriate allocation mechanism for drug expenditures under the universal health insurance system. However, the failure to incorporate a drug's value when determining its price decreases pharmaceutical companies' motivation to develop and launch novel drugs in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we applied the value-based pricing framework MARIE to drugs with new clinical status. We estimated drug prices at the time of approval for the initial indication and new clinical status, with a total of 32 drugs by using MARIE. To estimate maximum number of patients for the new clinical status, we referred to the market expansion rate and calculated it backwards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result, the median change of MARIE-estimated price under new clinical status against those under initial indication was -50.24% (range, -80.36% to 16.39%). For the initial indication, the median ratio of the drug price estimated with MARIE to the initial list price was 122.12% (range, 15.57% to 2237.38%); the median ratio of actual to estimated drug price were similar to those in our previous study (125.65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We proposed the versatile, practical, convenient, multiple criteria, qualitative VBP framework MARIE for the new clinical status. Under the MARIE system, price would only be changed when the \"box\" (category of the maximum number of patients) in the conversion table of the maximum number of the patients changes as the environment changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"606-614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2492478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adjustment of drug prices after the change of their clinical status in the current drug pricing system in Japan functions as an appropriate allocation mechanism for drug expenditures under the universal health insurance system. However, the failure to incorporate a drug's value when determining its price decreases pharmaceutical companies' motivation to develop and launch novel drugs in Japan.

Methods: In this study, we applied the value-based pricing framework MARIE to drugs with new clinical status. We estimated drug prices at the time of approval for the initial indication and new clinical status, with a total of 32 drugs by using MARIE. To estimate maximum number of patients for the new clinical status, we referred to the market expansion rate and calculated it backwards.

Results: As a result, the median change of MARIE-estimated price under new clinical status against those under initial indication was -50.24% (range, -80.36% to 16.39%). For the initial indication, the median ratio of the drug price estimated with MARIE to the initial list price was 122.12% (range, 15.57% to 2237.38%); the median ratio of actual to estimated drug price were similar to those in our previous study (125.65%).

Conclusions: We proposed the versatile, practical, convenient, multiple criteria, qualitative VBP framework MARIE for the new clinical status. Under the MARIE system, price would only be changed when the "box" (category of the maximum number of patients) in the conversion table of the maximum number of the patients changes as the environment changes.

针对新临床状态的多重标准定性价值定价框架“MARIE”。
背景:日本现行药品定价体系中药品临床地位改变后的药品价格调整,是全民医保制度下药品支出的合理分配机制。然而,在确定药物价格时没有考虑到药物的价值会降低制药公司在日本开发和推出新药的动力。方法:在本研究中,我们将基于价值的定价框架MARIE应用于具有新临床地位的药物。我们使用MARIE估计了初始适应症和新临床状态获批时的药品价格,共有32种药物。为了估计新的临床状态的最大患者数量,我们参考了市场扩张率并进行了反向计算。结果:与初始适应症相比,新临床状态下marie估计价格的中位数变化为-50.24%(范围为-80.36%至16.39%)。对于初始适应症,MARIE估计的药品价格与初始目录价格之比中位数为122.12%(范围为15.57%至2237.38%);实际药品价格与预估药品价格之比中位数与本研究相近(125.65%)。结论:我们提出了多功能、实用、方便、多标准、定性的VBP框架MARIE,以适应新的临床状况。在MARIE制度下,只有当最大患者数换算表中的“框”(最大患者数类别)随着环境变化而变化时,价格才会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信