Pilot Study: Innovative Minimally Invasive Tarsal Tunnel Release for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients Minimizing Drawbacks.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006719
Hian Kim Erica Ngiam, Wenxian Png, Eric Wei Liang Cher, Jack Kian Ch'ng, Allen Wei Jiat Wong, Yee Onn Kok, Jiajun Feng
{"title":"Pilot Study: Innovative Minimally Invasive Tarsal Tunnel Release for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients Minimizing Drawbacks.","authors":"Hian Kim Erica Ngiam, Wenxian Png, Eric Wei Liang Cher, Jack Kian Ch'ng, Allen Wei Jiat Wong, Yee Onn Kok, Jiajun Feng","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers are challenging to manage due to the multifactorial nature of the disease, with diabetic neuropathy being a primary contributing factor. Tarsal tunnel release has shown promise in restoring sensation, reducing ulcer recurrence through improved sensation, and enhancing microcirculation to promote ulcer healing. However, existing open and endoscopic techniques have notable limitations. This study introduces a novel minimally invasive tarsal tunnel release technique designed to address these shortcomings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Sengkang General Hospital, a tertiary care center. The control group comprised 22 consecutive patients who underwent open tarsal tunnel release, whereas the treatment group included 34 consecutive patients treated with the novel minimally invasive approach. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving sensation (100% versus 95.5%) and 2-point discrimination (88.2% versus 86.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.19, <i>P</i> = 0.83, respectively). However, the treatment group exhibited significantly shorter wound lengths (2.3 ± 0.26 versus 5.8 ± 0.72 cm; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and a faster wound healing duration (15 ± 5 versus 24 ± 17 d; <i>P</i> = 0.0052). Additionally, the treatment group experienced no major wound complications compared with a 13.6% complication rate in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This minimally invasive novel technique demonstrates similar efficacy in improving sensation while addressing the limitations of existing open and endoscopic methods. It offers significant advantages in terms of reduced wound size, faster healing, and lower complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers are challenging to manage due to the multifactorial nature of the disease, with diabetic neuropathy being a primary contributing factor. Tarsal tunnel release has shown promise in restoring sensation, reducing ulcer recurrence through improved sensation, and enhancing microcirculation to promote ulcer healing. However, existing open and endoscopic techniques have notable limitations. This study introduces a novel minimally invasive tarsal tunnel release technique designed to address these shortcomings.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Sengkang General Hospital, a tertiary care center. The control group comprised 22 consecutive patients who underwent open tarsal tunnel release, whereas the treatment group included 34 consecutive patients treated with the novel minimally invasive approach. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months.

Results: Both groups demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving sensation (100% versus 95.5%) and 2-point discrimination (88.2% versus 86.4%; P = 0.19, P = 0.83, respectively). However, the treatment group exhibited significantly shorter wound lengths (2.3 ± 0.26 versus 5.8 ± 0.72 cm; P < 0.0001) and a faster wound healing duration (15 ± 5 versus 24 ± 17 d; P = 0.0052). Additionally, the treatment group experienced no major wound complications compared with a 13.6% complication rate in the control group (P = 0.029).

Conclusions: This minimally invasive novel technique demonstrates similar efficacy in improving sensation while addressing the limitations of existing open and endoscopic methods. It offers significant advantages in terms of reduced wound size, faster healing, and lower complication rates.

试点研究:创新微创跗骨隧道松解术治疗糖尿病足溃疡患者,最大限度地减少缺陷。
背景:由于糖尿病足溃疡的多因素性质,糖尿病性神经病变是主要的促成因素,因此治疗糖尿病足溃疡具有挑战性。跗骨隧道释放在恢复感觉、通过改善感觉减少溃疡复发、增强微循环促进溃疡愈合方面显示出希望。然而,现有的开放和内窥镜技术有明显的局限性。本研究介绍了一种新颖的微创跗骨隧道松解技术,旨在解决这些缺点。方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法,在三甲医院圣康总医院进行。对照组包括22例连续接受开放跗骨隧道松解术的患者,而治疗组包括34例连续接受新型微创入路治疗的患者。所有患者均随访至少3个月。结果:两组在改善感觉(100%对95.5%)和2点辨别(88.2%对86.4%;P = 0.19, P = 0.83)。然而,治疗组创面长度明显较短(2.3±0.26 vs 5.8±0.72 cm);P < 0.0001)和更快的伤口愈合时间(15±5比24±17 d;P = 0.0052)。治疗组无重大创面并发症,对照组并发症发生率为13.6% (P = 0.029)。结论:这种微创新技术在改善感觉方面表现出类似的效果,同时解决了现有开放和内窥镜方法的局限性。它在减少伤口大小、更快愈合和降低并发症发生率方面具有显著的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信