Hian Kim Erica Ngiam, Wenxian Png, Eric Wei Liang Cher, Jack Kian Ch'ng, Allen Wei Jiat Wong, Yee Onn Kok, Jiajun Feng
{"title":"Pilot Study: Innovative Minimally Invasive Tarsal Tunnel Release for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients Minimizing Drawbacks.","authors":"Hian Kim Erica Ngiam, Wenxian Png, Eric Wei Liang Cher, Jack Kian Ch'ng, Allen Wei Jiat Wong, Yee Onn Kok, Jiajun Feng","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers are challenging to manage due to the multifactorial nature of the disease, with diabetic neuropathy being a primary contributing factor. Tarsal tunnel release has shown promise in restoring sensation, reducing ulcer recurrence through improved sensation, and enhancing microcirculation to promote ulcer healing. However, existing open and endoscopic techniques have notable limitations. This study introduces a novel minimally invasive tarsal tunnel release technique designed to address these shortcomings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Sengkang General Hospital, a tertiary care center. The control group comprised 22 consecutive patients who underwent open tarsal tunnel release, whereas the treatment group included 34 consecutive patients treated with the novel minimally invasive approach. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving sensation (100% versus 95.5%) and 2-point discrimination (88.2% versus 86.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.19, <i>P</i> = 0.83, respectively). However, the treatment group exhibited significantly shorter wound lengths (2.3 ± 0.26 versus 5.8 ± 0.72 cm; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and a faster wound healing duration (15 ± 5 versus 24 ± 17 d; <i>P</i> = 0.0052). Additionally, the treatment group experienced no major wound complications compared with a 13.6% complication rate in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This minimally invasive novel technique demonstrates similar efficacy in improving sensation while addressing the limitations of existing open and endoscopic methods. It offers significant advantages in terms of reduced wound size, faster healing, and lower complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot ulcers are challenging to manage due to the multifactorial nature of the disease, with diabetic neuropathy being a primary contributing factor. Tarsal tunnel release has shown promise in restoring sensation, reducing ulcer recurrence through improved sensation, and enhancing microcirculation to promote ulcer healing. However, existing open and endoscopic techniques have notable limitations. This study introduces a novel minimally invasive tarsal tunnel release technique designed to address these shortcomings.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Sengkang General Hospital, a tertiary care center. The control group comprised 22 consecutive patients who underwent open tarsal tunnel release, whereas the treatment group included 34 consecutive patients treated with the novel minimally invasive approach. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months.
Results: Both groups demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving sensation (100% versus 95.5%) and 2-point discrimination (88.2% versus 86.4%; P = 0.19, P = 0.83, respectively). However, the treatment group exhibited significantly shorter wound lengths (2.3 ± 0.26 versus 5.8 ± 0.72 cm; P < 0.0001) and a faster wound healing duration (15 ± 5 versus 24 ± 17 d; P = 0.0052). Additionally, the treatment group experienced no major wound complications compared with a 13.6% complication rate in the control group (P = 0.029).
Conclusions: This minimally invasive novel technique demonstrates similar efficacy in improving sensation while addressing the limitations of existing open and endoscopic methods. It offers significant advantages in terms of reduced wound size, faster healing, and lower complication rates.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.