Xin Peng, Huizi Zhao, Chufeng Lv, Ping Gao, Yi Ren, Jing Cheng, Juan Zhou
{"title":"Breast cancer wound imaging: evaluation of the cross-localisation method.","authors":"Xin Peng, Huizi Zhao, Chufeng Lv, Ping Gao, Yi Ren, Jing Cheng, Juan Zhou","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2021.0297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Wound image acquisition has been widely used in wound care; however, there are few reports on scientifically accurate technology in wound image acquisition for wound evaluation. This study compared the effectiveness of a cross-localisation method with a direct photographic method for image acquisition of breast cancer wounds.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The wounds of eligible patients were assessed by direct measurement, direct photography, and by a cross-localisation method using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) with 13 items. After four months, the wound images were re-evaluated and re-recorded for consistency assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental cohort comprised 150 patients. The consistency of the total BWAT score between the direct photograph acquisition and direct measurement methods was poor (Kappa=0.375). Only wound size, induration and exudate type presented general consistency. There was a good consistency between the cross-localisation image method and the direct measurement method (Kappa=0.786). The wound size, depth, oedema, induration and granulation tissue demonstrated complete consistency between the direct measurement and cross-localisation methods (Kappa=1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wound imaging using direct photography does not present the wound characteristics with complete clarity; however cross-localisation with an objective reference showed optimal performance in this study. The cross-localisation method can provide more specific and accurate wound evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup4","pages":"S17-S21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.0297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Wound image acquisition has been widely used in wound care; however, there are few reports on scientifically accurate technology in wound image acquisition for wound evaluation. This study compared the effectiveness of a cross-localisation method with a direct photographic method for image acquisition of breast cancer wounds.
Method: The wounds of eligible patients were assessed by direct measurement, direct photography, and by a cross-localisation method using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) with 13 items. After four months, the wound images were re-evaluated and re-recorded for consistency assessment.
Results: The experimental cohort comprised 150 patients. The consistency of the total BWAT score between the direct photograph acquisition and direct measurement methods was poor (Kappa=0.375). Only wound size, induration and exudate type presented general consistency. There was a good consistency between the cross-localisation image method and the direct measurement method (Kappa=0.786). The wound size, depth, oedema, induration and granulation tissue demonstrated complete consistency between the direct measurement and cross-localisation methods (Kappa=1.000).
Conclusion: Wound imaging using direct photography does not present the wound characteristics with complete clarity; however cross-localisation with an objective reference showed optimal performance in this study. The cross-localisation method can provide more specific and accurate wound evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.