A Pilot Study of Microcolumn Skin Grafting in Full-thickness Burns.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Martin R Buta, Matthew Supple, Sean Hickey, Jonathan S Friedstat, John T Schulz, Edward A Bittner, Joshua Tam, Jeremy Goverman
{"title":"A Pilot Study of Microcolumn Skin Grafting in Full-thickness Burns.","authors":"Martin R Buta, Matthew Supple, Sean Hickey, Jonathan S Friedstat, John T Schulz, Edward A Bittner, Joshua Tam, Jeremy Goverman","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of treating third-degree, full-thickness burn wounds with both split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) and micro skin tissue columns (MSTC). Donor sites for both grafting techniques were also assessed. Patients aged ≥18 years with ≤60% total body surface area (TBSA) third-degree, full-thickness burns were enrolled. One 2.5 x 2.5 cm2 wound area was treated in each subject, with the remaining portion of the wound used as an internal control. The target wound was treated with MSTCs + STSG while the control site was treated with STSG. Patients were followed for up to nine months after wound closure. Primary endpoints included re-epithelialization rate (RER), scarring (Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale), and donor site pain (visual analogue scale). Ten patients were enrolled. Overall, MSTC donor sites were less painful, epithelialized faster, and resulted in improved POSAS and VSS scores than STSG donor sites. For all endpoints, there were no differences in the recipient wounds grafted with or without MSTCs. Intraoperative MSTC grafting is feasible and results in minimal donor site morbidity. This pilot study was unable to demonstrate enhanced wound healing or reduced scar formation when MSTCs were applied simultaneously with STSGs to burn wounds. Larger clinical studies are needed to assess the utility of MSTCs in conjunction with STSGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of treating third-degree, full-thickness burn wounds with both split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) and micro skin tissue columns (MSTC). Donor sites for both grafting techniques were also assessed. Patients aged ≥18 years with ≤60% total body surface area (TBSA) third-degree, full-thickness burns were enrolled. One 2.5 x 2.5 cm2 wound area was treated in each subject, with the remaining portion of the wound used as an internal control. The target wound was treated with MSTCs + STSG while the control site was treated with STSG. Patients were followed for up to nine months after wound closure. Primary endpoints included re-epithelialization rate (RER), scarring (Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale), and donor site pain (visual analogue scale). Ten patients were enrolled. Overall, MSTC donor sites were less painful, epithelialized faster, and resulted in improved POSAS and VSS scores than STSG donor sites. For all endpoints, there were no differences in the recipient wounds grafted with or without MSTCs. Intraoperative MSTC grafting is feasible and results in minimal donor site morbidity. This pilot study was unable to demonstrate enhanced wound healing or reduced scar formation when MSTCs were applied simultaneously with STSGs to burn wounds. Larger clinical studies are needed to assess the utility of MSTCs in conjunction with STSGs.

全层烧伤微柱植皮的初步研究。
本初步研究评估了劈裂厚度皮肤移植(STSGs)和微皮肤组织柱(MSTC)治疗三度全层烧伤创面的可行性。对两种移植技术的供体部位也进行了评估。年龄≥18岁,三度全层烧伤(TBSA)≤60%的患者入组。每个受试者处理一个2.5 x 2.5 cm2的伤口面积,伤口的剩余部分作为内部对照。靶创面采用MSTCs + STSG治疗,对照创面采用STSG治疗。在伤口愈合后对患者进行了长达9个月的随访。主要终点包括再上皮化率(RER)、疤痕(温哥华疤痕量表、患者和观察者疤痕评估量表)和供体部位疼痛(视觉模拟量表)。10名患者入组。总的来说,与STSG供体部位相比,MSTC供体部位疼痛更少,上皮化更快,POSAS和VSS评分也有所提高。对于所有终点,移植或不移植MSTCs的受者伤口没有差异。术中MSTC移植是可行的,且供体部位发病率最小。当MSTCs与STSGs同时应用于烧伤创面时,这项初步研究无法证明MSTCs能促进伤口愈合或减少疤痕形成。需要更大规模的临床研究来评估MSTCs与STSGs联合使用的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信