Foot Flexibility and Alignment Are Weakly Correlated with Multisegment Foot Kinematics During the Landing Task.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Yuya Ezawa, Yuta Koshino, Masanori Yamanaka, Takumi Okunuki, Mina Samukawa, Takeo Maruyama, Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"Foot Flexibility and Alignment Are Weakly Correlated with Multisegment Foot Kinematics During the Landing Task.","authors":"Yuya Ezawa, Yuta Koshino, Masanori Yamanaka, Takumi Okunuki, Mina Samukawa, Takeo Maruyama, Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"10.7547/23-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flat feet show increased foot motion during dynamic tasks. Although the increased motion is one of the risk factors for sports-related injuries, few studies have investigated how foot flexibility affects foot kinematics during landing. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between foot alignment, foot flexibility, and multisegment foot kinematics during a double-leg landing task in healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (50% female) participated in this study. Their mean ± SD age was 22.0 ± 1.3 years; height, 166.1 ± 8.9 cm; and mass, 57.5 ± 8.8 kg. Foot alignment and flexibility were assessed using normalized navicular height truncated (NNHt) and the navicular drop (ND) test, respectively. A multisegment foot model was used to record shank, rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot motion during drop landing from a height of 30 cm. Peak angle and range of motion were measured for each segment from the initial contact to 200 msec after landing. The relationships between NNHt, ND, and foot kinematics were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NNHt was significantly correlated with peak rearfoot eversion angle (r = -0.353). The ND test values were significantly correlated with midfoot dorsiflexion and forefoot inversion excursion (r = 0.364 and 0.356, respectively). No significant correlation was found for the other kinematic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Foot alignment and flexibility should be evaluated separately because these foot measurements were correlated with different foot motions. However, it may be difficult to predict foot motion during the landing task by evaluating foot alignment and flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flat feet show increased foot motion during dynamic tasks. Although the increased motion is one of the risk factors for sports-related injuries, few studies have investigated how foot flexibility affects foot kinematics during landing. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between foot alignment, foot flexibility, and multisegment foot kinematics during a double-leg landing task in healthy participants.

Methods: Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (50% female) participated in this study. Their mean ± SD age was 22.0 ± 1.3 years; height, 166.1 ± 8.9 cm; and mass, 57.5 ± 8.8 kg. Foot alignment and flexibility were assessed using normalized navicular height truncated (NNHt) and the navicular drop (ND) test, respectively. A multisegment foot model was used to record shank, rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot motion during drop landing from a height of 30 cm. Peak angle and range of motion were measured for each segment from the initial contact to 200 msec after landing. The relationships between NNHt, ND, and foot kinematics were explored.

Results: The NNHt was significantly correlated with peak rearfoot eversion angle (r = -0.353). The ND test values were significantly correlated with midfoot dorsiflexion and forefoot inversion excursion (r = 0.364 and 0.356, respectively). No significant correlation was found for the other kinematic outcomes.

Conclusions: Foot alignment and flexibility should be evaluated separately because these foot measurements were correlated with different foot motions. However, it may be difficult to predict foot motion during the landing task by evaluating foot alignment and flexibility.

足部柔韧性和对准与多段足部运动学在着陆过程中呈弱相关。
背景:扁平足在动态任务中表现为足部运动增加。虽然增加的运动是运动相关损伤的危险因素之一,但很少有研究调查足部柔韧性如何影响足部在着陆过程中的运动学。本研究旨在探讨健康参与者在双腿着地任务中足部对齐、足部柔韧性和多节段足部运动学之间的关系。方法:38名健康志愿者(50%为女性)参加了本研究。平均±SD年龄为22.0±1.3岁;高度:166.1±8.9 cm;质量为57.5±8.8 kg。分别使用标准化舟骨高度截断(NNHt)和舟骨落差(ND)测试评估足部对齐和灵活性。采用多节段足部模型,记录从30 cm高度落体时小腿、后脚、中脚和前脚的运动。从初始接触到着陆后200毫秒,测量了每个节段的峰值角度和运动范围。探讨了NNHt、ND和足部运动学之间的关系。结果:NNHt与后足外翻角峰呈显著相关(r = -0.353)。ND测试值与中足背屈和前足倒立偏移呈显著相关(r分别为0.364和0.356)。其他运动学结果没有发现明显的相关性。结论:由于足部测量与不同的足部运动相关,因此应单独评估足部对齐和灵活性。然而,通过评估足部对齐和灵活性来预测足部在着陆任务中的运动可能是困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信