Respiratory Therapy with Digital Inhalers: Insights from Multimodal Experimental and In Vitro Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
David Ney Gonzalez, Martijn Grinovero, Luca Ponti, Cristina Cova, Valeria Sesana, Marco Franza, Mauro Citterio, Yannick Baschung
{"title":"Respiratory Therapy with Digital Inhalers: Insights from Multimodal Experimental and <i>In Vitro</i> Analysis.","authors":"David Ney Gonzalez, Martijn Grinovero, Luca Ponti, Cristina Cova, Valeria Sesana, Marco Franza, Mauro Citterio, Yannick Baschung","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2024.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The RS01X is a digital dry powder inhaler (DPI) that records inhalation parameters such as technique or adherence. This offers patients and health care providers a way to have a feedback on inhalation treatments. This study used real-life data gained from 28 healthy volunteers for adherence assessment, technique evaluation, and <i>in vitro</i> testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study enrolled 28 healthy volunteers. Participants were shown how to use an inhaler and provided with empty capsules. The inhalers record several inhalation parameters such as peak inspiratory flow (PIF), volume, duration, and orientation. Half of the participants were selected to be in an \"intervention\" group with access to their inhalation data as well as feedback to improve their inhalation. The other half were a \"control\" group without access to their data nor any feedback. The data were then used for <i>in vitro</i> testing. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 28 participants were enrolled, and inhalation data were available for 13 interventions and 15 controls. Average adherence was 82.0% and 69.5% for intervention and control, respectively. The technique of inhalation was 65.58% good, 19.89% fair, and 14.53% poor for the intervention group and 36.73% good, 26.99% fair, and 36.28% poor for the control group. The variability of PIF was 9% for intervention and 30% for control. <i>In vitro</i> simulations showed the importance of proper angle orientation in inhalation, which was supported by <i>in vivo</i> data. The fine particle fraction of active pharmaceutical ingredients was similar to the inhalation profile of the intervention in comparison with a theoretical perfect inhalation. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study results showed clear improvement in inhalation technique and adherence for patients using digital DPI. In addition, <i>in vitro</i> testing provided concrete data illustrating the measurable advancements digitalization offers in enhancing patient adherence and inhalation technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The RS01X is a digital dry powder inhaler (DPI) that records inhalation parameters such as technique or adherence. This offers patients and health care providers a way to have a feedback on inhalation treatments. This study used real-life data gained from 28 healthy volunteers for adherence assessment, technique evaluation, and in vitro testing. Methods: The study enrolled 28 healthy volunteers. Participants were shown how to use an inhaler and provided with empty capsules. The inhalers record several inhalation parameters such as peak inspiratory flow (PIF), volume, duration, and orientation. Half of the participants were selected to be in an "intervention" group with access to their inhalation data as well as feedback to improve their inhalation. The other half were a "control" group without access to their data nor any feedback. The data were then used for in vitro testing. Results: Overall, 28 participants were enrolled, and inhalation data were available for 13 interventions and 15 controls. Average adherence was 82.0% and 69.5% for intervention and control, respectively. The technique of inhalation was 65.58% good, 19.89% fair, and 14.53% poor for the intervention group and 36.73% good, 26.99% fair, and 36.28% poor for the control group. The variability of PIF was 9% for intervention and 30% for control. In vitro simulations showed the importance of proper angle orientation in inhalation, which was supported by in vivo data. The fine particle fraction of active pharmaceutical ingredients was similar to the inhalation profile of the intervention in comparison with a theoretical perfect inhalation. Conclusion: This study results showed clear improvement in inhalation technique and adherence for patients using digital DPI. In addition, in vitro testing provided concrete data illustrating the measurable advancements digitalization offers in enhancing patient adherence and inhalation technique.

数字吸入器呼吸治疗:来自多模态实验和体外分析的见解。
背景:RS01X是一种数字干粉吸入器(DPI),记录吸入参数,如技术或粘附性。这为患者和医疗保健提供者提供了一种对吸入治疗进行反馈的方法。本研究使用来自28名健康志愿者的真实数据进行依从性评估、技术评估和体外测试。方法:本研究招募了28名健康志愿者。向参与者展示了如何使用吸入器,并提供了空胶囊。吸入器记录几个吸入参数,如吸气峰值流量(PIF)、体积、持续时间和方向。一半的参与者被选为“干预”组,可以获得他们的吸入数据以及反馈以改善他们的吸入。另一半是“对照组”,没有访问他们的数据,也没有任何反馈。这些数据随后被用于体外测试。结果:总的来说,28名参与者入组,13项干预措施和15项对照组的吸入数据可用。干预组和对照组的平均依从性分别为82.0%和69.5%。干预组吸入技术好65.58%,一般19.89%,差14.53%;对照组吸入技术好36.73%,一般26.99%,差36.28%。干预组PIF变异性为9%,对照组为30%。体外模拟表明,适当的角度取向在吸入中的重要性,这得到了体内数据的支持。活性药物成分的细颗粒部分与理论完美吸入相比,与干预的吸入轮廓相似。结论:本研究结果显示使用数字DPI的患者在吸入技术和依从性方面有明显改善。此外,体外测试提供了具体的数据,说明了数字化在增强患者依从性和吸入技术方面所带来的可衡量的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信