Evaluating Cost-Effective Strategies for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Diagnosis: A Risk-Based Alternative to the American Urological Association Guidelines.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Krishay Sridalla, Hiten D Patel, Dustin D French, Joshua J Meeks, Lili Zhao, Yuying Xing, David J Bentrem
{"title":"Evaluating Cost-Effective Strategies for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Diagnosis: A Risk-Based Alternative to the American Urological Association Guidelines.","authors":"Krishay Sridalla, Hiten D Patel, Dustin D French, Joshua J Meeks, Lili Zhao, Yuying Xing, David J Bentrem","doi":"10.1002/jso.28148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend evaluating asymptomatic microhematuria (MH) at ≥ 3 red blood cells per high powered field (RBCs/hpf), resulting in significant costs with limited bladder cancer detections. This study evaluates alternative diagnostic strategies to improve the cost-effectiveness of asymptomatic MH evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cost-effectiveness analysis compared three alternative strategies: Strategy 1 (cystoscopy at ≥ 26 RBCs/hpf) was compared to a 3 RBCs/hpf threshold, while Strategy 2 (cystoscopy and renal ultrasound at ≥ 3 RBCs/hpf) and Strategy 3 (cystoscopy and renal ultrasound at ≥ 26 RBCs/hpf) were compared to the AUA guidelines. Total costs, cost per patient evaluated, costs per cancer detected, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strategy 3 minimized costs without significantly reducing early cancer detection rates. It was cost-effective for females (ICER = $120,649) and the total sample (ICER = $50,648) but not specifically for males (ICER = $23,326). Strategies 1 and 2 yielded lower cost savings and were less efficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategy 3-performing cystoscopy and renal ultrasound for higher-risk patients ( ≥ 26 RBCs/hpf)-offers a more cost-effective approach than the AUA guidelines, particularly for women. Future studies should incorporate additional patient variables and diagnostic test characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend evaluating asymptomatic microhematuria (MH) at ≥ 3 red blood cells per high powered field (RBCs/hpf), resulting in significant costs with limited bladder cancer detections. This study evaluates alternative diagnostic strategies to improve the cost-effectiveness of asymptomatic MH evaluation.

Methods: The cost-effectiveness analysis compared three alternative strategies: Strategy 1 (cystoscopy at ≥ 26 RBCs/hpf) was compared to a 3 RBCs/hpf threshold, while Strategy 2 (cystoscopy and renal ultrasound at ≥ 3 RBCs/hpf) and Strategy 3 (cystoscopy and renal ultrasound at ≥ 26 RBCs/hpf) were compared to the AUA guidelines. Total costs, cost per patient evaluated, costs per cancer detected, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated.

Results: Strategy 3 minimized costs without significantly reducing early cancer detection rates. It was cost-effective for females (ICER = $120,649) and the total sample (ICER = $50,648) but not specifically for males (ICER = $23,326). Strategies 1 and 2 yielded lower cost savings and were less efficient.

Conclusions: Strategy 3-performing cystoscopy and renal ultrasound for higher-risk patients ( ≥ 26 RBCs/hpf)-offers a more cost-effective approach than the AUA guidelines, particularly for women. Future studies should incorporate additional patient variables and diagnostic test characteristics.

评估无症状微血尿诊断的成本效益策略:美国泌尿协会指南的基于风险的替代方案。
背景和目的:美国泌尿学会(AUA)指南推荐在每高倍视野(rbc /hpf)≥3个红细胞时评估无症状微血尿(MH),这会导致膀胱癌检测有限的重大成本。本研究评估替代诊断策略,以提高无症状MH评估的成本效益。方法:成本-效果分析比较了三种替代策略:将策略1(膀胱镜检查≥26红细胞/hpf)与3红细胞/hpf阈值进行比较,而将策略2(膀胱镜检查和肾超声检查≥3红细胞/hpf)和策略3(膀胱镜检查和肾超声检查≥26红细胞/hpf)与AUA指南进行比较。计算总成本、每位患者评估成本、每个癌症检测成本和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)。结果:策略3在不显著降低早期癌症检出率的情况下最小化了成本。对于女性(ICER = 120,649美元)和总样本(ICER = 50,648美元)来说,这是具有成本效益的,但对于男性(ICER = 23,326美元)来说,这不是特别有效的。策略1和策略2节省的成本较低,效率较低。结论:策略3:对高危患者(≥26红细胞/hpf)进行膀胱镜检查和肾脏超声检查比AUA指南更具成本效益,特别是对女性。未来的研究应纳入更多的患者变量和诊断测试特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信