Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Impact of Yearly Caseload in the Quality Registry of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG).

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Artur Besch, Jörg Heckenkamp, Farzin Adili, Markus Steinbauer, Livia Cotta, Christian-Alexander Behrendt
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Impact of Yearly Caseload in the Quality Registry of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG).","authors":"Artur Besch, Jörg Heckenkamp, Farzin Adili, Markus Steinbauer, Livia Cotta, Christian-Alexander Behrendt","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While the impact of yearly caseload on short term outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is still under debate, current data from the most decentralised healthcare system in Europe may offer valuable insights into an area that has changed considerably due to the widespread use of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study of multicentric quality registry data from Germany on EVAR for intact and ruptured AAA between January 2017 and December 2023. The impact of yearly caseload and risk factors on in hospital mortality, complication rates, and failure to rescue after intact AAA repair was determined using multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 641 individuals (n = 2 576 females [13.1%]; median age 74 years, interquartile range [IQR] 68, 80) who underwent EVAR for intact (n = 18 763) or ruptured (n = 878) AAA were included at 194 centres. Among these, 44.3% of males were selected for treatment with maximum diameter < 55 mm (31.8% of females < 50 mm). After a median length of hospital stay of 6 days (IQR 5, 8) and 10 days (IQR 6, 17) for intact and ruptured cases, 1.0% and 19.7% died, respectively. The rate of any post-interventional complication was 8.2% and 31.4%, respectively. An endoleak was apparent in the completion angiography in 17.6% of intact cases (14.5% type II) and 18.2% of ruptured cases (11.0% type II). The median yearly EVAR caseload per centre was 34.7 (IQR 22.1, 58.4), and 25.1% of patients were treated at centres above the 75th percentile. An American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 4, juxtarenal aneurysm extent, severe heart failure, female sex, larger aneurysm diameter, older age, and history of cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and stroke were associated with in hospital death after intact AAA repair, but not yearly caseload or severe chronic kidney failure. Sensitivity analyses including different outcomes were confirmative, except for a statistically significant impact of yearly caseload on the composite endpoint of any post-interventional complication (p = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large registry analysis was unable to confirm an impact of caseload on short term results after EVAR for intact AAA. Future studies should address long term outcomes after EVAR as well as the underlying reasons for the considerably large proportion of small AAA treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.05.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While the impact of yearly caseload on short term outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is still under debate, current data from the most decentralised healthcare system in Europe may offer valuable insights into an area that has changed considerably due to the widespread use of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of multicentric quality registry data from Germany on EVAR for intact and ruptured AAA between January 2017 and December 2023. The impact of yearly caseload and risk factors on in hospital mortality, complication rates, and failure to rescue after intact AAA repair was determined using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 19 641 individuals (n = 2 576 females [13.1%]; median age 74 years, interquartile range [IQR] 68, 80) who underwent EVAR for intact (n = 18 763) or ruptured (n = 878) AAA were included at 194 centres. Among these, 44.3% of males were selected for treatment with maximum diameter < 55 mm (31.8% of females < 50 mm). After a median length of hospital stay of 6 days (IQR 5, 8) and 10 days (IQR 6, 17) for intact and ruptured cases, 1.0% and 19.7% died, respectively. The rate of any post-interventional complication was 8.2% and 31.4%, respectively. An endoleak was apparent in the completion angiography in 17.6% of intact cases (14.5% type II) and 18.2% of ruptured cases (11.0% type II). The median yearly EVAR caseload per centre was 34.7 (IQR 22.1, 58.4), and 25.1% of patients were treated at centres above the 75th percentile. An American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 4, juxtarenal aneurysm extent, severe heart failure, female sex, larger aneurysm diameter, older age, and history of cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and stroke were associated with in hospital death after intact AAA repair, but not yearly caseload or severe chronic kidney failure. Sensitivity analyses including different outcomes were confirmative, except for a statistically significant impact of yearly caseload on the composite endpoint of any post-interventional complication (p = .008).

Conclusion: This large registry analysis was unable to confirm an impact of caseload on short term results after EVAR for intact AAA. Future studies should address long term outcomes after EVAR as well as the underlying reasons for the considerably large proportion of small AAA treatment.

在德国血管外科和血管医学学会(DGG)的质量登记中,腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗和每年病例量的影响。
目的:虽然每年的病例量对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复后短期结果的影响仍在争论中,但目前来自欧洲最分散的医疗保健系统的数据可能为由于血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的广泛使用而发生很大变化的领域提供有价值的见解。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,收集了2017年1月至2023年12月来自德国的多中心质量登记数据,涉及完整和破裂AAA的EVAR。使用多变量logistic回归模型确定年度病例量和危险因素对医院死亡率、并发症发生率和完整AAA修复后抢救失败的影响。结果:共有19 641只(雌性2 576只,占13.1%);中位年龄74岁,四分位间距[IQR] 68,80), 194个中心的完整AAA (n = 18763)或破裂AAA (n = 878)行EVAR。结论:这项大型登记分析无法证实病例量对完整AAA EVAR后短期结果的影响。未来的研究应解决EVAR后的长期结果以及相当大比例的小AAA治疗的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信