Discounting seems the most toxic dimension of invalidation in fibromyalgia: a cross-sectional analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Heidi Willemse, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Rinie Geenen
{"title":"Discounting seems the most toxic dimension of invalidation in fibromyalgia: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Heidi Willemse, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Rinie Geenen","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05850-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invalidation, both discounting (overt negative social responses) and lack of understanding (absence of positive social responses), is a common problem in fibromyalgia. The 'Fibromyalgia Imbalance of Threat and Soothing Systems' (FITSS) model indicates that different neuropsychological processes may underlie these two components of invalidation. Guided by this model, the aim of the current study was to clarify the differentiation between these two components of invalidation by examining their association with fibromyalgia severity, anxiety, and depression. This cross-sectional study included the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I), the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), and the Hospital and Depression Scale (HADS). Demographics of the 280 respondents with fibromyalgia were: mean age 42.6 ± 11.8 yrs., 95% female, mean FIQ score 59.1 ± 15,5, possible or probable cases of anxiety and depression, 49% and 42%, respectively. Regression analyses revealed that discounting was associated with severity of fibromyalgia (t = 4.10, β = 0.34, p <.001), anxiety (t = 3.50, β = 0.29, p <.001) and depression (t = 3.64, β = 0.30, p <.001) symptoms. Neither lack of understanding (-1.62 ≤ t ≤.10, -0.13 ≤ β ≤ 0.01, p ≥ 0.11) nor the interaction of discounting and lack of understanding (-0.19 ≤ t ≤ 1.10, -0.01 ≤ β ≤ 0.07, p ≥ 0.27) was related to any of the outcome variables. The total model accounted for 8.8%, 5.3%, and 8.3% (adjusted R<sup>2</sup>) of variance in fibromyalgia severity, anxiety, and depression, respectively. In relation to both mental and physical health, discounting seems the most toxic dimension of invalidation in fibromyalgia. This suggests that overt negative responses should get attention in its management, especially in more severe fibromyalgia. Both people with fibromyalgia and people in their environment have a role in reducing invalidation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 5","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05850-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Invalidation, both discounting (overt negative social responses) and lack of understanding (absence of positive social responses), is a common problem in fibromyalgia. The 'Fibromyalgia Imbalance of Threat and Soothing Systems' (FITSS) model indicates that different neuropsychological processes may underlie these two components of invalidation. Guided by this model, the aim of the current study was to clarify the differentiation between these two components of invalidation by examining their association with fibromyalgia severity, anxiety, and depression. This cross-sectional study included the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I), the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), and the Hospital and Depression Scale (HADS). Demographics of the 280 respondents with fibromyalgia were: mean age 42.6 ± 11.8 yrs., 95% female, mean FIQ score 59.1 ± 15,5, possible or probable cases of anxiety and depression, 49% and 42%, respectively. Regression analyses revealed that discounting was associated with severity of fibromyalgia (t = 4.10, β = 0.34, p <.001), anxiety (t = 3.50, β = 0.29, p <.001) and depression (t = 3.64, β = 0.30, p <.001) symptoms. Neither lack of understanding (-1.62 ≤ t ≤.10, -0.13 ≤ β ≤ 0.01, p ≥ 0.11) nor the interaction of discounting and lack of understanding (-0.19 ≤ t ≤ 1.10, -0.01 ≤ β ≤ 0.07, p ≥ 0.27) was related to any of the outcome variables. The total model accounted for 8.8%, 5.3%, and 8.3% (adjusted R2) of variance in fibromyalgia severity, anxiety, and depression, respectively. In relation to both mental and physical health, discounting seems the most toxic dimension of invalidation in fibromyalgia. This suggests that overt negative responses should get attention in its management, especially in more severe fibromyalgia. Both people with fibromyalgia and people in their environment have a role in reducing invalidation.

折扣似乎是纤维肌痛无效的最有害的方面:横断面分析。
无效感,包括轻视(明显的消极社会反应)和缺乏理解(缺乏积极的社会反应),是纤维肌痛的常见问题。“纤维肌痛威胁和舒缓系统失衡”(FITSS)模型表明,不同的神经心理过程可能是导致这两种失效的原因。在该模型的指导下,本研究的目的是通过检查这两种无效成分与纤维肌痛严重程度、焦虑和抑郁的关系来阐明它们之间的区别。本横断面研究包括疾病无效量表(3*I)、纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)和医院与抑郁量表(HADS)。280名纤维肌痛患者的人口统计数据为:平均年龄42.6±11.8岁。95%为女性,平均FIQ评分59.1±15.5,可能或可能出现焦虑和抑郁的患者分别占49%和42%。回归分析显示,折扣分别与纤维肌痛严重程度、焦虑和抑郁的方差相关(t = 4.10, β = 0.34, p 2)。在精神和身体健康方面,折扣似乎是纤维肌痛无效的最有害的方面。这表明在治疗中应注意明显的负面反应,特别是在更严重的纤维肌痛中。纤维肌痛患者和他们周围的人都有减少失效的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信