Measuring Human Pavlovian Reward Conditioning and Memory Retention After Consolidation.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Yanfang Xia, Huaiyu Liu, Oliver K Kälin, Samuel Gerster, Dominik R Bach
{"title":"Measuring Human Pavlovian Reward Conditioning and Memory Retention After Consolidation.","authors":"Yanfang Xia, Huaiyu Liu, Oliver K Kälin, Samuel Gerster, Dominik R Bach","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While a body of literature has addressed the quantification of aversive Pavlovian conditioning in humans, Pavlovian reward conditioning with primary reinforcers and its recall after overnight consolidation remain understudied. In particular, few studies have directly compared different conditioned response types and their retrodictive validity. Here, we sought to fill this gap by investigating heart period responses (HPR), skin conductance responses (SCR), pupil size responses (PSR), and respiration amplitude responses (RAR). We conducted two independent experiments (N<sub>1</sub> = 37, N<sub>2</sub> = 34) with a learning phase and a recall phase 7 days later. A visual conditioned stimulus (CS+) predicted fruit juice reward (unconditioned stimulus, US), while a second CS- predicted US absence. In experiment 1, model-based analysis of HPR distinguished CS+/CS-, both during learning (Hedge's g = 0.56) and recall (g = 0.40). Furthermore, model-based analysis of PSR distinguished CS+/CS- in early trials during recall (g = 0.69). As an out-of-sample generalization test, experiment 2 confirmed the result for HPR during learning (g = 0.78) and recall (g = 0.55), as well as for PSR during recall (g = 0.41). In contrast, peak-scoring analysis of PSR yielded low retrodictive validity. We conclude that in our Pavlovian reward conditioning paradigm, HPR is a valid measure of reward learning, while both HPR and PSR validly index the retention of reward memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 4","pages":"e70058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While a body of literature has addressed the quantification of aversive Pavlovian conditioning in humans, Pavlovian reward conditioning with primary reinforcers and its recall after overnight consolidation remain understudied. In particular, few studies have directly compared different conditioned response types and their retrodictive validity. Here, we sought to fill this gap by investigating heart period responses (HPR), skin conductance responses (SCR), pupil size responses (PSR), and respiration amplitude responses (RAR). We conducted two independent experiments (N1 = 37, N2 = 34) with a learning phase and a recall phase 7 days later. A visual conditioned stimulus (CS+) predicted fruit juice reward (unconditioned stimulus, US), while a second CS- predicted US absence. In experiment 1, model-based analysis of HPR distinguished CS+/CS-, both during learning (Hedge's g = 0.56) and recall (g = 0.40). Furthermore, model-based analysis of PSR distinguished CS+/CS- in early trials during recall (g = 0.69). As an out-of-sample generalization test, experiment 2 confirmed the result for HPR during learning (g = 0.78) and recall (g = 0.55), as well as for PSR during recall (g = 0.41). In contrast, peak-scoring analysis of PSR yielded low retrodictive validity. We conclude that in our Pavlovian reward conditioning paradigm, HPR is a valid measure of reward learning, while both HPR and PSR validly index the retention of reward memory.

测量人类巴甫洛夫奖励条件反射和巩固后的记忆保留。
虽然已有大量文献对人类厌恶的巴甫洛夫条件反射进行了量化研究,但对具有初级强化物的巴甫洛夫奖励条件反射及其在一夜巩固后的回忆的研究仍然不足。特别是,很少有研究直接比较不同的条件反应类型及其追溯效度。在这里,我们试图通过研究心期反应(HPR)、皮肤电导反应(SCR)、瞳孔大小反应(PSR)和呼吸幅度反应(RAR)来填补这一空白。我们进行了两个独立的实验(N1 = 37, N2 = 34), 7天后进行学习阶段和回忆阶段。一个视觉条件刺激(CS+)预测果汁奖励(非条件刺激,US),而第二个CS-预测US缺失。在实验1中,基于模型的HPR分析区分了学习(Hedge’s g = 0.56)和回忆(g = 0.40)时的CS+/CS-。此外,基于模型的PSR分析在回忆的早期试验中区分了CS+/CS- (g = 0.69)。作为样本外泛化检验,实验2证实了学习过程中的HPR (g = 0.78)和回忆过程中的PSR (g = 0.55)以及回忆过程中的PSR (g = 0.41)的结果。相比之下,PSR的峰值评分分析产生了低的追溯效度。我们得出结论,在我们的巴甫洛夫奖励条件反射范式中,HPR是奖励学习的有效衡量标准,而HPR和PSR都有效地反映了奖励记忆的保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信