{"title":"Relationship Between Oral Health Status and Cachexia in Patient With Dysphagia.","authors":"Takako Nagai, Hidetaka Wakabayashi, Shingo Kakehi, Eri Isono, Yukiko Otsuka, Junki Ninomiya, Shinta Nishioka, Ryo Momosaki","doi":"10.1111/joor.14019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the association between oral health status and cachexia among the patients with dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The registry data of the Japanese Sarcopenic Dysphagia Database were used. Oral health screening was performed with the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG) or the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT). ROAG score ≥ 13 or OHAT score ≥ 3 was defined as poor oral health status. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) was evaluated with the Barthel index (BI) and swallowing function was evaluated with the Food Intake Level Scale (FILS). The relationship between oral status and the presence of cachexia and other evaluation criteria was evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 401 older patients with dysphagia (mean age 81 years; 49% women, and 209 cases (52%) had poor oral health. In univariate analysis, poor oral health had significantly more malnutrition and cachexia (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively) and significantly lower BI and FILS (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that oral care status was detected as a factor affecting the presence of cachexia (odds ratio: 1.881, 95% confidence interval, 1.156 to 3.060, p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of cachexia is higher in the case of poor oral health status. Rehabilitation, nutritional support and oral health care may contribute to the management of cachexia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.14019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to clarify the association between oral health status and cachexia among the patients with dysphagia.
Material and methods: The registry data of the Japanese Sarcopenic Dysphagia Database were used. Oral health screening was performed with the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG) or the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT). ROAG score ≥ 13 or OHAT score ≥ 3 was defined as poor oral health status. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) was evaluated with the Barthel index (BI) and swallowing function was evaluated with the Food Intake Level Scale (FILS). The relationship between oral status and the presence of cachexia and other evaluation criteria was evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: The study included 401 older patients with dysphagia (mean age 81 years; 49% women, and 209 cases (52%) had poor oral health. In univariate analysis, poor oral health had significantly more malnutrition and cachexia (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively) and significantly lower BI and FILS (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that oral care status was detected as a factor affecting the presence of cachexia (odds ratio: 1.881, 95% confidence interval, 1.156 to 3.060, p = 0.011).
Conclusion: The risk of cachexia is higher in the case of poor oral health status. Rehabilitation, nutritional support and oral health care may contribute to the management of cachexia.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.