Microkeratome-assisted vs femtosecond laser-assisted superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Mrinalini Singh, Amrita Joshi, Sarvadarshi Shukla, Alok Sati, Anju Pannu, Sonali V Kumar, Jaya Kaushik
{"title":"Microkeratome-assisted vs femtosecond laser-assisted superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Mrinalini Singh, Amrita Joshi, Sarvadarshi Shukla, Alok Sati, Anju Pannu, Sonali V Kumar, Jaya Kaushik","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1454_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to compare the outcomes between microkeratome-assisted superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty (MK-SALK) and femtosecond laser-assisted superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty (FL-SALK) for superficial corneal opacities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five eyes with superficial corneal opacities were prospectively randomized into the MK-SALK control arm and an FL-SALK study arm. Follow-up examinations were set at day 1, day 7, day 30, and at the third and sixth month after the surgery. The primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), whereas secondary outcome measures were contrast sensitivity, corneal aberrations, K-readings, corneal thickness, and complications after the surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two eyes completed the six-month follow-up interval. An insignificant difference in BCVA was observed at day 30 [control arm (n = 36); 0.80 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR), study arm (n = 36); 0.78 ± 0.12 log MAR, P = 0.63], at third month [control arm; 0.65 ± 0.28 log MAR, study arm; 0.66 ± 0.10 log MAR, P = 0.93], and sixth month [control arm; 0.61 ± 0.28 log MAR, study arm; 0.62 ± 0.10 log MAR, P = 0.84] following surgery. In addition, an insignificant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of contrast sensitivity, corneal aberration, mean keratometric value, mean central corneal thickness, and complications following surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MK-SALK is non-inferior to FL-SALK for the treatment of superficial corneal opacities. By demonstrating comparable outcomes, our study alleviates apprehension and doubts about choosing between the techniques and allows the surgeon to make a choice based on his expertise and resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1454_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to compare the outcomes between microkeratome-assisted superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty (MK-SALK) and femtosecond laser-assisted superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty (FL-SALK) for superficial corneal opacities.

Methods: Seventy-five eyes with superficial corneal opacities were prospectively randomized into the MK-SALK control arm and an FL-SALK study arm. Follow-up examinations were set at day 1, day 7, day 30, and at the third and sixth month after the surgery. The primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), whereas secondary outcome measures were contrast sensitivity, corneal aberrations, K-readings, corneal thickness, and complications after the surgery.

Results: Seventy-two eyes completed the six-month follow-up interval. An insignificant difference in BCVA was observed at day 30 [control arm (n = 36); 0.80 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR), study arm (n = 36); 0.78 ± 0.12 log MAR, P = 0.63], at third month [control arm; 0.65 ± 0.28 log MAR, study arm; 0.66 ± 0.10 log MAR, P = 0.93], and sixth month [control arm; 0.61 ± 0.28 log MAR, study arm; 0.62 ± 0.10 log MAR, P = 0.84] following surgery. In addition, an insignificant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of contrast sensitivity, corneal aberration, mean keratometric value, mean central corneal thickness, and complications following surgery.

Conclusions: MK-SALK is non-inferior to FL-SALK for the treatment of superficial corneal opacities. By demonstrating comparable outcomes, our study alleviates apprehension and doubts about choosing between the techniques and allows the surgeon to make a choice based on his expertise and resources.

微角膜辅助与飞秒激光辅助浅前板层角膜移植术:一项随机对照试验。
目的:比较微角膜角膜辅助浅前板层角膜移植术(MK-SALK)与飞秒激光辅助浅前板层角膜移植术(FL-SALK)治疗浅表性角膜混浊的疗效。方法:将75只角膜浅表性混浊的眼睛随机分为MK-SALK对照组和FL-SALK研究组。随访检查分别于术后第1天、第7天、第30天、第3个月和第6个月进行。主要指标是最佳矫正视力(BCVA),而次要指标是对比敏感度、角膜像差、k读数、角膜厚度和术后并发症。结果:72只眼完成了6个月的随访。在第30天,BCVA的差异不显著[对照组(n = 36)];最小分辨角(log MAR)的0.80±0.27对数,研究组(n = 36);0.78±0.12 log MAR, P = 0.63],第3个月[对照组;0.65±0.28 log MAR,研究组;0.66±0.10 log MAR, P = 0.93],第6个月[对照组;0.61±0.28 log MAR,研究组;0.62±0.10 log MAR, P = 0.84]。此外,两组在对比敏感度、角膜像差、平均角膜度数、平均角膜中央厚度、术后并发症方面差异无统计学意义。结论:MK-SALK治疗角膜浅表性混浊的效果不逊于FL-SALK。通过展示可比较的结果,我们的研究减轻了对技术选择的忧虑和疑虑,并允许外科医生根据他的专业知识和资源做出选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信