Predictors of secondary revascularization after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and role of dual antiplatelet therapy.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Iftikhar Ali Ch, Khurram Nasir, Azhar Chaudhry, Pei-Tzu Wu, Muhammad Siddique, Raja Ullah, Mashal Tahirkheli, Abdul Qadar, Hunter Weitzel, Rahat Jamal, Naeem Tahirkheli
{"title":"Predictors of secondary revascularization after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and role of dual antiplatelet therapy.","authors":"Iftikhar Ali Ch, Khurram Nasir, Azhar Chaudhry, Pei-Tzu Wu, Muhammad Siddique, Raja Ullah, Mashal Tahirkheli, Abdul Qadar, Hunter Weitzel, Rahat Jamal, Naeem Tahirkheli","doi":"10.1186/s13019-025-03434-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in surgical techniques, interventional procedures, novel pharmacotherapies, and other contemporary treatments, patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) remain at risk for graft failure and progression of native vessel disease progression. Consequently, secondary revascularization is often required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study evaluating the incidence, trends, and predictors of revascularization after CABG surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,476 patients followed in this post-CABG study, 1458 patients received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to 1005 patients received aspirin monotherapy (AMT). The overall incidence of revascularization was significantly higher in the DAPT group (14.54%, 212 out of 1458) compared to the AMT group (7.07%, 71 out of 1005), with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.24 (95% CI: 1.69-2.97, p < 0.001). 770 patients who received DAPT for six months or more after surgery were compared in sub-analysis and were noted to have significantly higher incidence of revascularization compared to AMT (22.08% vs. 6.96%; OR = 3.157, 95% CI: 2.734-4.940; p < 0.001). The binary regression model revealed that younger patients ( hazard ratio (HR) = 0.964, 95% CI: 0.95-0.97; p < 0.001), diabetics (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.12-2.00, p = 0.007), patients who had fewer internal mammary artery grafts (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.81, p = 0.003), and patients receiving DAPT of any duration after CABG (HR = 3.47, 95% CI: 2.55-4.72, p < 0.001) were more likely to receive revascularization after CABG. The model, comprising these four predictors, was able to explain 12.8% of the variance in post-CABG revascularization (Nagelkerke R² = 0.128; p < 0.001). The survival rates were 96.5% for the DAPT group and 92.0% for AMT (odds ratio (OR) = 0.421, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.269-0.658; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diabetes mellitus, younger age, fewer Internal mammary artery grafts, and the use of DAPT after CABG were strong predictors of the need for secondary revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03434-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite advancements in surgical techniques, interventional procedures, novel pharmacotherapies, and other contemporary treatments, patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) remain at risk for graft failure and progression of native vessel disease progression. Consequently, secondary revascularization is often required.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational study evaluating the incidence, trends, and predictors of revascularization after CABG surgery.

Results: Of 2,476 patients followed in this post-CABG study, 1458 patients received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to 1005 patients received aspirin monotherapy (AMT). The overall incidence of revascularization was significantly higher in the DAPT group (14.54%, 212 out of 1458) compared to the AMT group (7.07%, 71 out of 1005), with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.24 (95% CI: 1.69-2.97, p < 0.001). 770 patients who received DAPT for six months or more after surgery were compared in sub-analysis and were noted to have significantly higher incidence of revascularization compared to AMT (22.08% vs. 6.96%; OR = 3.157, 95% CI: 2.734-4.940; p < 0.001). The binary regression model revealed that younger patients ( hazard ratio (HR) = 0.964, 95% CI: 0.95-0.97; p < 0.001), diabetics (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.12-2.00, p = 0.007), patients who had fewer internal mammary artery grafts (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.81, p = 0.003), and patients receiving DAPT of any duration after CABG (HR = 3.47, 95% CI: 2.55-4.72, p < 0.001) were more likely to receive revascularization after CABG. The model, comprising these four predictors, was able to explain 12.8% of the variance in post-CABG revascularization (Nagelkerke R² = 0.128; p < 0.001). The survival rates were 96.5% for the DAPT group and 92.0% for AMT (odds ratio (OR) = 0.421, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.269-0.658; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus, younger age, fewer Internal mammary artery grafts, and the use of DAPT after CABG were strong predictors of the need for secondary revascularization.

冠状动脉搭桥术后继发性血运重建的预测因素及双重抗血小板治疗的作用。
背景:尽管外科技术、介入手术、新型药物治疗和其他当代治疗方法取得了进步,冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)后患者仍然存在移植物衰竭和原生血管疾病进展的风险。因此,经常需要二次血运重建术。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,评估CABG手术后血运重建的发生率、趋势和预测因素。结果:在这项cabg后随访的2476例患者中,1458例患者接受了双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT),而1005例患者接受了阿司匹林单药治疗(AMT)。与AMT组(7.07%,71 / 1005)相比,DAPT组血运重建术的总发生率(14.54%,212 / 1458)显著高于AMT组(7.07%,71 / 1005),优势比(OR)为2.24 (95% CI: 1.69-2.97, p)结论:糖尿病、年龄较小、较少的乳腺内动脉移植术以及CABG后DAPT的使用是需要二次血运重建术的有力预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信