Short-term outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients undergoing carotid stent placement or carotid endarterectomy in the United States.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Research Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1080/01616412.2025.2496929
Adnan I Qureshi, Hatem Tolba, Mohammed Sulaiman Khan, Camilo R Gomez, Chun Shing Kwok
{"title":"Short-term outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients undergoing carotid stent placement or carotid endarterectomy in the United States.","authors":"Adnan I Qureshi, Hatem Tolba, Mohammed Sulaiman Khan, Camilo R Gomez, Chun Shing Kwok","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2496929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were excluded from the trials evaluating carotid artery stent placement (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We identified the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and how it might be associated with outcomes in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2021 with stenosis of ICA who underwent CAS or CEA. We compared the end points of intra- and post-procedural cerebral infarction, hemorrhage, discharge home and death based on the presence or absence of AF. We also compared the outcomes in AF patients who had CAS with those who had CEA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Atrial fibrillation was present in 3,785 (18.3%) of 20,645 patients who underwent either CAS or CEA between 2016 and 2021, while 16,860 did not have atrial fibrillation. The proportion of patients who developed acute myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, or required blood transfusion was higher in patients with atrial fibrillation among both CAS- and CEA-treated patients. There was no difference in odds of post-procedural stroke and/or death in patients with atrial fibrillation (compared with those without atrial fibrillation) who were treated with CAS (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.60, <i>p</i> = 0.98) and those treated with CEA (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.69-1.73, <i>p</i> = 0.72 in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for potential confounders. The length of stay and hospitalization cost were significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation. There was no difference in post-procedural stroke and/or death (10.7% versus 8.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.41) and discharge home (32.4% versus 26.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.13) in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent CEA compared to those who underwent CAS in propensity-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One in five patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis who undergo CAS or CEA have AF. We did not identify higher risk of post-procedural stroke and/or death irrespective of the procedure, but resource utilization was higher in AF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"658-665"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2496929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were excluded from the trials evaluating carotid artery stent placement (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We identified the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and how it might be associated with outcomes in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.

Methods: We analyzed the data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2021 with stenosis of ICA who underwent CAS or CEA. We compared the end points of intra- and post-procedural cerebral infarction, hemorrhage, discharge home and death based on the presence or absence of AF. We also compared the outcomes in AF patients who had CAS with those who had CEA.

Results: Atrial fibrillation was present in 3,785 (18.3%) of 20,645 patients who underwent either CAS or CEA between 2016 and 2021, while 16,860 did not have atrial fibrillation. The proportion of patients who developed acute myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, or required blood transfusion was higher in patients with atrial fibrillation among both CAS- and CEA-treated patients. There was no difference in odds of post-procedural stroke and/or death in patients with atrial fibrillation (compared with those without atrial fibrillation) who were treated with CAS (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.60, p = 0.98) and those treated with CEA (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.69-1.73, p = 0.72 in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for potential confounders. The length of stay and hospitalization cost were significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation. There was no difference in post-procedural stroke and/or death (10.7% versus 8.7%, p = 0.41) and discharge home (32.4% versus 26.8%, p = 0.13) in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent CEA compared to those who underwent CAS in propensity-matched analysis.

Conclusion: One in five patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis who undergo CAS or CEA have AF. We did not identify higher risk of post-procedural stroke and/or death irrespective of the procedure, but resource utilization was higher in AF patients.

房颤患者在美国接受颈动脉支架置入或颈动脉内膜切除术的短期预后
背景:心房颤动(AF)患者被排除在评估颈动脉支架置入(CAS)或颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的试验之外。我们确定了房颤的患病率及其与症状性颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄患者预后的关系。方法:我们分析了2016年至2021年接受CAS或CEA治疗的ICA狭窄的全国住院患者样本的数据。我们比较了房颤存在与否的术中、术后脑梗死、出血、出院和死亡的终点。我们还比较了房颤合并CAS患者和CEA患者的结局。结果:2016年至2021年期间,20,645例接受CAS或CEA治疗的患者中有3,785例(18.3%)存在房颤,而16,860例无房颤。在CAS和cea治疗的心房颤动患者中,发生急性心肌梗死、呼吸衰竭、急性肾损伤或需要输血的患者比例更高。在调整潜在混杂因素后的多因素分析中,经CAS治疗的房颤患者(与无房颤患者相比)术后卒中和/或死亡的几率(比值比[or] 0.99, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.62-1.60, p = 0.98)与经CEA治疗的房颤患者(比值比[or] 1.09, 95% CI 0.69-1.73, p = 0.72)无差异。房颤患者的住院时间和住院费用明显高于房颤患者。在倾向匹配分析中,接受CEA的心房颤动患者与接受CAS的心房颤动患者在手术后卒中和/或死亡(10.7%对8.7%,p = 0.41)和出院(32.4%对26.8%,p = 0.13)方面没有差异。结论:五分之一的症状性ICA狭窄患者接受CAS或CEA后发生房颤。我们没有发现手术后卒中和/或死亡的风险更高,但房颤患者的资源利用率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信