Arthroscopic Evaluation of Cyclops Lesions and Clinical Outcomes Following Remnant-Preserved ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Two Truncated Remnant Preservation Techniques.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-025-01378-6
Sun-Ho Lee, Keun-Churl Chun, Jong-Seok Baik, Kwang-Il Koh, Sung-Hoon Kim, Churl Hong Chun
{"title":"Arthroscopic Evaluation of Cyclops Lesions and Clinical Outcomes Following Remnant-Preserved ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Two Truncated Remnant Preservation Techniques.","authors":"Sun-Ho Lee, Keun-Churl Chun, Jong-Seok Baik, Kwang-Il Koh, Sung-Hoon Kim, Churl Hong Chun","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01378-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes between two types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a truncated remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 58 cases of ACL reconstruction using a truncated remnant preservation technique performed by a single surgeon from March 2019 to December 2022. Second-look arthroscopy was performed in each group, and pathologic evaluation was performed focusing on cyclops lesions. The cases were divided into two groups according to the type of remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction group (<i>n</i> = 16) and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction group (<i>n</i> = 42). We evaluated the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes in the two groups using follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in patient characteristics was observed between the two groups. The clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft significantly reduces cyclops lesion occurrence compared to the tie technique, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This technique is particularly beneficial in cases with sufficient remnant tissue and minimizes complications associated with cyclops lesions, such as extension loss and the need for secondary surgical interventions. Therefore, we recommend re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 5","pages":"681-688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01378-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes between two types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a truncated remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 58 cases of ACL reconstruction using a truncated remnant preservation technique performed by a single surgeon from March 2019 to December 2022. Second-look arthroscopy was performed in each group, and pathologic evaluation was performed focusing on cyclops lesions. The cases were divided into two groups according to the type of remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction group (n = 16) and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction group (n = 42). We evaluated the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes in the two groups using follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy.

Results: No difference in patient characteristics was observed between the two groups. The clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion: Re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft significantly reduces cyclops lesion occurrence compared to the tie technique, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This technique is particularly beneficial in cases with sufficient remnant tissue and minimizes complications associated with cyclops lesions, such as extension loss and the need for secondary surgical interventions. Therefore, we recommend re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

关节镜下评估残馀ACL重建后独眼病变和临床结果:两种截短残馀保存技术的比较研究。
前言:本研究旨在比较两种前交叉韧带(ACL)截短重建技术:同种异体移植前交叉韧带重建和同种异体移植前交叉韧带重建后残余前交叉韧带再张紧的发病率和临床结果。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析了2019年3月至2022年12月由一名外科医生使用截短残肢保存技术进行的58例ACL重建。各组均行第二次关节镜检查,并以独眼病变为重点进行病理评估。根据残余技术类型分为同种异体ACL重建系扎组(n = 16)和同种异体ACL重建残余ACL再张紧组(n = 42)。我们通过随访磁共振成像和二次关节镜检查来评估两组患者独眼病变的发生率和临床结果。结果:两组患者特征无明显差异。两组临床结果无明显差异。结论:与结扎技术相比,同种异体前交叉韧带再张紧术显著减少了单眼病变的发生,同时保持了相当的临床效果。该技术在有足够残余组织的情况下特别有益,并最大限度地减少与独眼病变相关的并发症,如延伸丢失和需要二次手术干预。因此,我们建议用同种异体ACL移植重建残余ACL再张紧术。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信