Opioid use disorder Cascade of care: defining a taxonomy for measurement.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Brandy F Henry, Noa Krawczyk, Ashly E Jordan, Chinazo O Cunningham, Pat Lincourt, Shazia Hussain, Charissa Fotinos, Arthur Robin Williams
{"title":"Opioid use disorder Cascade of care: defining a taxonomy for measurement.","authors":"Brandy F Henry, Noa Krawczyk, Ashly E Jordan, Chinazo O Cunningham, Pat Lincourt, Shazia Hussain, Charissa Fotinos, Arthur Robin Williams","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2025.2494106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The opioid use disorder Cascade of care (OUD Cascade) is a public health framework used by federal/state/other agencies and researchers to facilitate monitoring and evaluating responses to the opioid epidemic, including surveillance and performance evaluation. As the use of the framework proliferates, there is an urgent need to standardize stage definitions to accurately monitor and improve patient outcomes and to align interpretation of findings across settings.<i>Objectives:</i> Define a taxonomy to uniformly apply the OUD Cascade to improve delivery of OUD services and better compare patient outcomes across settings and populations.<i>Methods:</i> We conducted a narrative review and synthesis focused on research and guidelines defining and measuring four key OUD Cascade stages: OUD identification, service engagement, medication initiation, and retention. Included articles come from peer-reviewed literature and define and/or operationalize OUD Cascade stages and associated measures across six characteristics based on an adaptation of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist including: 1) settings, 2) specific population, 3) perspective, 4) time horizon, 5) assumptions, and 6) analytic method.<i>Results:</i> Our review (<i>n</i> = 27 articles) and synthesis provide an overview of how OUD Cascade definitions and framework designs have been variously applied. We found considerable heterogeneity in study approaches for all four OUD Cascade stages. We define a taxonomy to guide future research emphasizing standardized definitions to harmonize efforts across settings. In particular, we emphasize the need for clarity in defining criteria for sample construction (i.e. Identification), clear distinctions between receipt of care services generally (i.e. Engagement) from MOUD Initiation specifically, and Retention definitions that use a 30+ day gap in treatment to define discontinuation.<i>Conclusion:</i> Establishing a shared taxonomy for key terms specifying OUD Cascade stages will help the field advance, compare approaches and results across settings, and improve population-level patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2494106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The opioid use disorder Cascade of care (OUD Cascade) is a public health framework used by federal/state/other agencies and researchers to facilitate monitoring and evaluating responses to the opioid epidemic, including surveillance and performance evaluation. As the use of the framework proliferates, there is an urgent need to standardize stage definitions to accurately monitor and improve patient outcomes and to align interpretation of findings across settings.Objectives: Define a taxonomy to uniformly apply the OUD Cascade to improve delivery of OUD services and better compare patient outcomes across settings and populations.Methods: We conducted a narrative review and synthesis focused on research and guidelines defining and measuring four key OUD Cascade stages: OUD identification, service engagement, medication initiation, and retention. Included articles come from peer-reviewed literature and define and/or operationalize OUD Cascade stages and associated measures across six characteristics based on an adaptation of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist including: 1) settings, 2) specific population, 3) perspective, 4) time horizon, 5) assumptions, and 6) analytic method.Results: Our review (n = 27 articles) and synthesis provide an overview of how OUD Cascade definitions and framework designs have been variously applied. We found considerable heterogeneity in study approaches for all four OUD Cascade stages. We define a taxonomy to guide future research emphasizing standardized definitions to harmonize efforts across settings. In particular, we emphasize the need for clarity in defining criteria for sample construction (i.e. Identification), clear distinctions between receipt of care services generally (i.e. Engagement) from MOUD Initiation specifically, and Retention definitions that use a 30+ day gap in treatment to define discontinuation.Conclusion: Establishing a shared taxonomy for key terms specifying OUD Cascade stages will help the field advance, compare approaches and results across settings, and improve population-level patient outcomes.

阿片类药物使用障碍级联护理:定义测量分类。
背景:阿片类药物使用障碍级联护理(OUD Cascade)是一个公共卫生框架,由联邦/州/其他机构和研究人员使用,以促进对阿片类药物流行的监测和评估,包括监测和绩效评估。随着该框架的使用激增,迫切需要标准化分期定义,以准确监测和改善患者的预后,并使不同情况下的结果解释保持一致。目的:定义一种分类,统一应用OUD级联,以改善OUD服务的提供,并更好地比较不同环境和人群的患者结果。方法:我们对定义和测量四个关键OUD级联阶段的研究和指南进行了叙述性的回顾和综合:OUD识别、服务参与、药物开始和保留。纳入的文章来自同行评审的文献,并根据综合卫生经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)清单的改编,定义和/或实施了OUD级联阶段和相关措施,这些特征包括:1)环境,2)特定人群,3)视角,4)时间范围,5)假设和6)分析方法。结果:我们的综述(n = 27篇文章)和综合综述了OUD级联定义和框架设计是如何被不同地应用的。我们发现所有四个OUD级联阶段的研究方法存在相当大的异质性。我们定义了一个分类法来指导未来的研究,强调标准化的定义,以协调跨设置的努力。特别是,我们强调需要明确定义样本构建(即识别)的标准,明确区分从mod启动的一般接受护理服务(即参与)和使用治疗间隔30天以上来定义终止的保留定义。结论:为指定OUD级联阶段的关键术语建立共享分类法将有助于该领域的发展,比较不同设置的方法和结果,并改善人群水平的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信