Can flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) minimize postoperative double J stent placement? Results from a propensity score-matched analysis of 540 patients of the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology and global FANS collaborative study group.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Daniele Castellani, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Khi Yung Fong, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Chin Tiong Heng, Mohamed Elshazly, Karl Tan, Thomas R W Herrmann, Olivier Traxer, Vineet Gauhar
{"title":"Can flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) minimize postoperative double J stent placement? Results from a propensity score-matched analysis of 540 patients of the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology and global FANS collaborative study group.","authors":"Daniele Castellani, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Khi Yung Fong, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Chin Tiong Heng, Mohamed Elshazly, Karl Tan, Thomas R W Herrmann, Olivier Traxer, Vineet Gauhar","doi":"10.4111/icu.20250071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath can obviate insertion of double J stent and establish the safety of overnight ureteric catheter placement as alternative following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five hundred forty adults were prospectively enrolled across 25 centers (from April 2023 to January 2024). Patients were divided into group 1 (overnight ureteric catheter), and group 2 (double J stent). Surgeons could choose either modality as per their discretion. One-to-one propensity score-matching for age, sex, pre-stenting, Hounsfield units, stone volume and location was performed. Thirty-day computed tomography scan was done to estimate stone-free status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Group 1 had significantly shorter lasing, ureteroscopy, surgical time. Median day 1 loin pain score was similar (1 [1, 2] in both groups). Median postoperative stay was shorter in group 1 (0 days [0, 1] vs. 1 day [0, 2], p<0.001). One patient in group 2 required a blood transfusion. Incidence of fever was similar (5.0% vs. 0.8%). Loin/abdominal pain requiring medication occurred in one patient in group 2. Stent-related symptoms occurred in 2 patients in group 1. Three patients (2.5%) in group 1 and 2 patients (1.7%) in group 2 required readmission. Thirty-day stone-free status was higher in group 1 patients (79.2% vs. 56.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In selected patients after thorough inspection to ensure no injury or residual fragments remain, placing an overnight ureteric catheter can be a safe alternative to a double J stent.</p>","PeriodicalId":14522,"journal":{"name":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","volume":"66 3","pages":"236-244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20250071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath can obviate insertion of double J stent and establish the safety of overnight ureteric catheter placement as alternative following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones.

Materials and methods: Five hundred forty adults were prospectively enrolled across 25 centers (from April 2023 to January 2024). Patients were divided into group 1 (overnight ureteric catheter), and group 2 (double J stent). Surgeons could choose either modality as per their discretion. One-to-one propensity score-matching for age, sex, pre-stenting, Hounsfield units, stone volume and location was performed. Thirty-day computed tomography scan was done to estimate stone-free status.

Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Group 1 had significantly shorter lasing, ureteroscopy, surgical time. Median day 1 loin pain score was similar (1 [1, 2] in both groups). Median postoperative stay was shorter in group 1 (0 days [0, 1] vs. 1 day [0, 2], p<0.001). One patient in group 2 required a blood transfusion. Incidence of fever was similar (5.0% vs. 0.8%). Loin/abdominal pain requiring medication occurred in one patient in group 2. Stent-related symptoms occurred in 2 patients in group 1. Three patients (2.5%) in group 1 and 2 patients (1.7%) in group 2 required readmission. Thirty-day stone-free status was higher in group 1 patients (79.2% vs. 56.7%).

Conclusions: In selected patients after thorough inspection to ensure no injury or residual fragments remain, placing an overnight ureteric catheter can be a safe alternative to a double J stent.

柔性输尿管镜使用柔性和可导航的吸力输尿管通路鞘(FANS-UAS)能减少术后双J型支架放置吗?结果来自欧洲泌尿外科协会泌尿科和全球FANS合作研究组的540例患者的倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:评价灵活可导航的输尿管吸入鞘是否可以避免双J型支架的置入,并建立输尿管留置过夜导尿管作为肾结石软性输尿管镜术后替代方案的安全性。材料和方法:在25个研究中心(2023年4月至2024年1月)前瞻性纳入540名成人。患者分为输尿管置管组1和双J型支架组2。外科医生可以根据自己的判断选择任何一种方式。对年龄、性别、支架植入前、霍斯菲尔德单位、结石体积和位置进行一对一的倾向评分匹配。进行了30天的计算机断层扫描来评估结石的清除情况。结果:配对后,每组纳入120例患者。1组激光照射、输尿管镜检查、手术时间明显缩短。两组第1天腰痛评分中位数相似(1[1,2])。第1组的术后中位住院时间较短(0天[0,1]vs. 1天[0,2])。结论:在经过彻底检查确保无损伤或碎片残留的患者中,放置输尿管导管过夜可以作为双J支架的安全替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative and Clinical Urology (Investig Clin Urol, ICUrology) is an international, peer-reviewed, platinum open access journal published bimonthly. ICUrology aims to provide outstanding scientific and clinical research articles, that will advance knowledge and understanding of urological diseases and current therapeutic treatments. ICUrology publishes Original Articles, Rapid Communications, Review Articles, Special Articles, Innovations in Urology, Editorials, and Letters to the Editor, with a focus on the following areas of expertise: • Precision Medicine in Urology • Urological Oncology • Robotics/Laparoscopy • Endourology/Urolithiasis • Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction • Female Urology • Sexual Dysfunction/Infertility • Infection/Inflammation • Reconstruction/Transplantation • Geriatric Urology • Pediatric Urology • Basic/Translational Research One of the notable features of ICUrology is the application of multimedia platforms facilitating easy-to-access online video clips of newly developed surgical techniques from the journal''s website, by a QR (quick response) code located in the article, or via YouTube. ICUrology provides current and highly relevant knowledge to a broad audience at the cutting edge of urological research and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信