[How could the spine MR investigations without correct indications be reduced?]

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alexandra Viczei, István Lapis, Erika Técsi, György Szeifert
{"title":"[How could the spine MR investigations without correct indications be reduced?]","authors":"Alexandra Viczei, István Lapis, Erika Técsi, György Szeifert","doi":"10.1556/650.2025.33287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction: Spinal pain and radiculopathies are often caused by degenerative changes, which are common indications for spinal MR imaging. The detection of disc degeneration, disc protrusion/herniation, spinal canal stenosis and small joint arthrosis, as well as pathological processes affecting the vertebrae and spinal space may require MR examination. Objective: Certain conditions clearly justify the imaging of the spine by MR, for which it is recommended to refer patients based on specific criteria systems. Method: In our hospital, 2105 such examinations were performed in 2023, which were evaluated individually by reviewing the referral criteria and the results. Results: In our hospital, referrals for spinal MR examinations were given by specialists in various fields. In 87% of cases, no neurological cause was proven, and the imaging studies did not show any clinically relevant abnormalities requiring surgical intervention. As a result, our waiting list stretched for several months due to the many “unnecessary” examinations, and in many cases the “14-day rule” for cancer patients was also violated. Discussion, conclusion: Physicians should be encouraged to follow the rules laid down by the profession, by applying these, waiting lists and the costs of care can be reduced, and it would be easier to ensure timely care for truly urgent patients. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(18): 710–716.</p>","PeriodicalId":19911,"journal":{"name":"Orvosi hetilap","volume":"166 18","pages":"710-716"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orvosi hetilap","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2025.33287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal pain and radiculopathies are often caused by degenerative changes, which are common indications for spinal MR imaging. The detection of disc degeneration, disc protrusion/herniation, spinal canal stenosis and small joint arthrosis, as well as pathological processes affecting the vertebrae and spinal space may require MR examination. Objective: Certain conditions clearly justify the imaging of the spine by MR, for which it is recommended to refer patients based on specific criteria systems. Method: In our hospital, 2105 such examinations were performed in 2023, which were evaluated individually by reviewing the referral criteria and the results. Results: In our hospital, referrals for spinal MR examinations were given by specialists in various fields. In 87% of cases, no neurological cause was proven, and the imaging studies did not show any clinically relevant abnormalities requiring surgical intervention. As a result, our waiting list stretched for several months due to the many “unnecessary” examinations, and in many cases the “14-day rule” for cancer patients was also violated. Discussion, conclusion: Physicians should be encouraged to follow the rules laid down by the profession, by applying these, waiting lists and the costs of care can be reduced, and it would be easier to ensure timely care for truly urgent patients. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(18): 710–716.

没有正确指征的脊柱MR检查如何减少?]
脊柱疼痛和神经根病通常由退行性改变引起,这是脊柱MR成像的常见适应症。发现椎间盘退变、椎间盘突出/突出、椎管狭窄和小关节,以及影响椎体和脊柱间隙的病理过程可能需要MR检查。目的:某些情况清楚地证明了脊柱磁共振成像的合理性,因此建议根据特定的标准系统转诊患者。方法:2023年我院共进行此类检查2105例,通过复核转诊标准和检查结果,分别进行评价。结果:本院有各专科医师转诊脊柱MR检查。在87%的病例中,没有证实神经系统原因,影像学研究未显示任何需要手术干预的临床相关异常。结果,由于许多“不必要的”检查,我们的等待名单延长了几个月,而且在许多情况下,癌症患者的“14天规则”也被违反了。讨论,结论:应鼓励医生遵守专业制定的规则,通过应用这些规则,可以减少等待名单和护理成本,并更容易确保及时照顾真正紧急的病人。Orv Hetil. 2025;166(18): 710 - 716。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orvosi hetilap
Orvosi hetilap MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original and review papers in the fields of experimental and clinical medicine. It covers epidemiology, diagnostics, therapy and the prevention of human diseases as well as papers of medical history. Orvosi Hetilap is the oldest, still in-print, Hungarian publication and also the one-and-only weekly published scientific journal in Hungary. The strategy of the journal is based on the Curatorium of the Lajos Markusovszky Foundation and on the National and International Editorial Board. The 150 year-old journal is part of the Hungarian Cultural Heritage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信