Proton Therapy Patient Selection Methods and the Impact of COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional International Survey.

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lucy Wood, Eileen Giles, Lisa Cunningham, Hien Le, Nicole Zientara, Michala Short
{"title":"Proton Therapy Patient Selection Methods and the Impact of COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional International Survey.","authors":"Lucy Wood, Eileen Giles, Lisa Cunningham, Hien Le, Nicole Zientara, Michala Short","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 outbreak has had far-reaching impacts on cancer services worldwide. It has yet to be described how the pandemic has impacted patient selection methods for proton therapy (PT) specifically. This survey aimed to investigate the current international methods implemented for PT patient selection and to determine whether COVID-19 has impacted PT practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 44-question survey was conducted from 29th January 2024 to 18th March 2024 using the Qualtrics platform. PT centres in 21 countries were invited to respond to the survey regarding patient selection methods used currently and prior to the pandemic, as well as impacts of COVID-19 on patient selection and service provision. The survey was disseminated with assistance from The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine centres completed the survey: four in Europe, three in the United States of America (USA), and two in Asia. Diagnosis or indications lists, clinical trials group assignment, dose distribution, dose metrics, and expert recommendations were the most reported patient selection approaches within the last five years. Only one centre in the USA reported changes to patient selection approaches during the height of the pandemic, mainly ceasing use of clinical trial group assignment. Six of the nine centres continued to treat patients infected with COVID-19. Five respondents indicated various suspensions or delays for certain treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings show most respondents did not alter their patient selection approaches during the pandemic. These findings, however, cannot be generalised to all PT centres due to the small sample size of respondents.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 outbreak has had far-reaching impacts on cancer services worldwide. It has yet to be described how the pandemic has impacted patient selection methods for proton therapy (PT) specifically. This survey aimed to investigate the current international methods implemented for PT patient selection and to determine whether COVID-19 has impacted PT practice.

Methods: A 44-question survey was conducted from 29th January 2024 to 18th March 2024 using the Qualtrics platform. PT centres in 21 countries were invited to respond to the survey regarding patient selection methods used currently and prior to the pandemic, as well as impacts of COVID-19 on patient selection and service provision. The survey was disseminated with assistance from The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group.

Results: Nine centres completed the survey: four in Europe, three in the United States of America (USA), and two in Asia. Diagnosis or indications lists, clinical trials group assignment, dose distribution, dose metrics, and expert recommendations were the most reported patient selection approaches within the last five years. Only one centre in the USA reported changes to patient selection approaches during the height of the pandemic, mainly ceasing use of clinical trial group assignment. Six of the nine centres continued to treat patients infected with COVID-19. Five respondents indicated various suspensions or delays for certain treatment groups.

Conclusions: The findings show most respondents did not alter their patient selection approaches during the pandemic. These findings, however, cannot be generalised to all PT centres due to the small sample size of respondents.

质子治疗患者选择方法和COVID-19的影响:一项横断面国际调查。
新冠肺炎疫情对全球癌症服务产生了深远影响。目前尚未描述大流行如何具体影响质子治疗(PT)的患者选择方法。本调查旨在调查目前国际上实施的PT患者选择方法,并确定COVID-19是否影响了PT实践。方法:于2024年1月29日至2024年3月18日使用qualics平台进行44个问题的调查。邀请21个国家的PT中心就当前和大流行之前使用的患者选择方法以及COVID-19对患者选择和服务提供的影响进行调查。这项调查是在粒子治疗合作小组的协助下传播的。结果:九个中心完成了调查:四个在欧洲,三个在美利坚合众国(美国),两个在亚洲。诊断或适应症列表、临床试验组分配、剂量分布、剂量计量和专家建议是过去五年中报告最多的患者选择方法。在大流行高峰期,美国只有一个中心报告了患者选择方法的变化,主要是停止使用临床试验组分配。9个中心中有6个继续治疗感染COVID-19的患者。五个答复者表示某些治疗组的各种暂停或延迟。结论:调查结果显示,大多数答复者在大流行期间没有改变其患者选择方法。然而,由于受访者的样本量小,这些发现不能推广到所有PT中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信