{"title":"A Retrospective Analysis: CCTA <i>vs.</i> TTE in Diagnosing Coronary Artery Fistula.","authors":"XiaoLi Hu, Jian Shen, ChunLi He, YueMei Li, Shen Gui, YuKun Cao, Ping Han, Jun Xu","doi":"10.2174/0115734056333289250311184106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study aimed to compare and analyze the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for coronary artery fistula (CAF) and evaluate the effectiveness of these two imaging modalities. Methods We retrospectively collected and analyzed imaging data from 200 patients diagnosed with CAF through surgery or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). These patients underwent CCTA and TTE examinations in our hospital. Finally, the course, origin, number, size, and location of the CAF in all patients were assessed. The diagnostic results of CCTA were compared with those of TTE, using DSA and/or surgical diagnosis as the reference standard. Results Among the 200 patients with CAF, CCTA correctly diagnosed 156 cases, but missed 44 cases, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 78.0% (156/200). In contrast, TTE accurately diagnosed 55 cases, but missed 145 cases, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 27.5% (55/200). The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA was significantly higher than that of TTE in detecting CAF (P < 0.001). Conclusion CCTA demonstrated significantly greater diagnostic value than TTE, demonstrating to be the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing CAF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056333289250311184106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to compare and analyze the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for coronary artery fistula (CAF) and evaluate the effectiveness of these two imaging modalities. Methods We retrospectively collected and analyzed imaging data from 200 patients diagnosed with CAF through surgery or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). These patients underwent CCTA and TTE examinations in our hospital. Finally, the course, origin, number, size, and location of the CAF in all patients were assessed. The diagnostic results of CCTA were compared with those of TTE, using DSA and/or surgical diagnosis as the reference standard. Results Among the 200 patients with CAF, CCTA correctly diagnosed 156 cases, but missed 44 cases, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 78.0% (156/200). In contrast, TTE accurately diagnosed 55 cases, but missed 145 cases, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 27.5% (55/200). The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA was significantly higher than that of TTE in detecting CAF (P < 0.001). Conclusion CCTA demonstrated significantly greater diagnostic value than TTE, demonstrating to be the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing CAF.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.