Postural control adaptations to different visual conditions in dancers and non-dancers with chronic ankle instability.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1553847
Eun Ji Hong, Jiho Kang, Hyung Gyu Jeon, Sae Yong Lee, Kyeongtak Song
{"title":"Postural control adaptations to different visual conditions in dancers and non-dancers with chronic ankle instability.","authors":"Eun Ji Hong, Jiho Kang, Hyung Gyu Jeon, Sae Yong Lee, Kyeongtak Song","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1553847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Even though dancers have good postural control ability, ankle sprain is the most common injury among dancers, developing into chronic ankle instability (CAI). While dancers rely on visual cues during stage and practice, it is unknown how dancers with CAI perform balance in different visual conditions. This study compares (1) static postural control between eyes open and closed, (2) visual reliance, and (3) dynamic postural control among dancers with CAI, uninjured dancers, non-dancers with CAI, and uninjured non-dancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten dancers with CAI, 10 uninjured dancers, 10 non-dancers with CAI, and 10 uninjured non-dancers. Participants performed single-leg standing with eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. COP area, velocity in mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP), and resultant velocity were calculated. Visual reliance (% modulation) was calculated using the percent change in COP values between EO and EC conditions. Participants performed a drop vertical jump and maintained balance to assess the dynamic postural stability index. A two-way analysis of variance (group and CAI status) and Bonferroni <i>post hoc</i> test were used to compare static balance, visual reliance, and dynamic balance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A main effect of CAI status was observed in COP area (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and COP AP velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.013) during static balance in the EO condition. We also observed CAI status main effect in COP area (<i>p</i> = 0.014), COP AP velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.010), and COP resultant velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.034), and a group main effect in COP ML velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.034) in EC condition. We found interactions between group and CAI status in the visual reliance of COP resultant velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.048), as well as significant group (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and CAI status effect (<i>p</i> = 0.006). However, there were no significant differences in dynamic postural control (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAI patients demonstrated postural control deficits in static balance under both eyes open and closed conditions compared to uninjured controls. However, dancers exhibited higher visual reliance than non-dancers, and CAI showed greater visual dependence than uninjured controls. This finding shows dancers use visual information differently, resulting in higher balance abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1553847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1553847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Even though dancers have good postural control ability, ankle sprain is the most common injury among dancers, developing into chronic ankle instability (CAI). While dancers rely on visual cues during stage and practice, it is unknown how dancers with CAI perform balance in different visual conditions. This study compares (1) static postural control between eyes open and closed, (2) visual reliance, and (3) dynamic postural control among dancers with CAI, uninjured dancers, non-dancers with CAI, and uninjured non-dancers.

Methods: Ten dancers with CAI, 10 uninjured dancers, 10 non-dancers with CAI, and 10 uninjured non-dancers. Participants performed single-leg standing with eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. COP area, velocity in mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP), and resultant velocity were calculated. Visual reliance (% modulation) was calculated using the percent change in COP values between EO and EC conditions. Participants performed a drop vertical jump and maintained balance to assess the dynamic postural stability index. A two-way analysis of variance (group and CAI status) and Bonferroni post hoc test were used to compare static balance, visual reliance, and dynamic balance.

Results: A main effect of CAI status was observed in COP area (p = 0.014) and COP AP velocity (p = 0.013) during static balance in the EO condition. We also observed CAI status main effect in COP area (p = 0.014), COP AP velocity (p = 0.010), and COP resultant velocity (p = 0.034), and a group main effect in COP ML velocity (p = 0.034) in EC condition. We found interactions between group and CAI status in the visual reliance of COP resultant velocity (p = 0.048), as well as significant group (p < 0.001) and CAI status effect (p = 0.006). However, there were no significant differences in dynamic postural control (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: CAI patients demonstrated postural control deficits in static balance under both eyes open and closed conditions compared to uninjured controls. However, dancers exhibited higher visual reliance than non-dancers, and CAI showed greater visual dependence than uninjured controls. This finding shows dancers use visual information differently, resulting in higher balance abilities.

慢性踝关节不稳的舞者和非舞者对不同视觉条件的姿势控制适应。
目的:尽管舞者具有良好的姿势控制能力,但踝关节扭伤是舞者中最常见的损伤,并发展为慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)。虽然舞者在舞台和练习中依赖视觉线索,但CAI舞者如何在不同的视觉条件下保持平衡尚不清楚。本研究比较了(1)有CAI的舞者、未受伤的舞者、未受伤的舞者和未受伤的非舞者的静态姿势控制,(2)视觉依赖,以及(3)动态姿势控制。方法:舞蹈家10例,舞蹈家10例,舞蹈家10例,舞蹈家10例,舞蹈家10例,舞蹈家10例。参与者在睁着眼睛(EO)和闭着眼睛(EC)的情况下进行单腿站立。计算COP面积、中外侧(ML)和正侧(AP)速度及合成速度。视觉依赖度(调制百分比)是通过在EO和EC条件下COP值的变化百分比来计算的。参与者进行垂直跳跃和保持平衡来评估动态姿势稳定性指数。采用双向方差分析(分组和CAI状态)和Bonferroni事后检验比较静态平衡、视觉依赖和动态平衡。结果:在静平衡状态下,CAI状态对COP面积(p = 0.014)和COP AP速度(p = 0.013)有主要影响。我们还观察到CAI状态对COP区域(p = 0.014)、COP AP速度(p = 0.010)和COP合成速度(p = 0.034)的主作用,以及EC状态下COP ML速度的组主作用(p = 0.034)。我们发现,在COP合成速度的视觉依赖方面,组与CAI状态之间存在交互作用(p = 0.048),组与CAI状态之间存在显著交互作用(p = 0.006)。但两组在动态姿势控制方面差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:与未受伤的对照组相比,CAI患者在双眼睁开和闭上状态下均表现出静态平衡姿势控制缺陷。然而,舞者比非舞者表现出更高的视觉依赖性,CAI比未受伤的对照组表现出更大的视觉依赖性。这一发现表明舞者使用视觉信息的方式不同,从而导致更高的平衡能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信